Literature DB >> 26160122

Modeling the binding affinity of structurally diverse industrial chemicals to carbon using the artificial intelligence approaches.

Shikha Gupta1, Nikita Basant2, Premanjali Rai1, Kunwar P Singh3.   

Abstract

Binding affinity of chemical to carbon is an important characteristic as it finds vast industrial applications. Experimental determination of the adsorption capacity of diverse chemicals onto carbon is both time and resource intensive, and development of computational approaches has widely been advocated. In this study, artificial intelligence (AI)-based ten different qualitative and quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models (MLPN, RBFN, PNN/GRNN, CCN, SVM, GEP, GMDH, SDT, DTF, DTB) were established for the prediction of the adsorption capacity of structurally diverse chemicals to activated carbon following the OECD guidelines. Structural diversity of the chemicals and nonlinear dependence in the data were evaluated using the Tanimoto similarity index and Brock-Dechert-Scheinkman statistics. The generalization and prediction abilities of the constructed models were established through rigorous internal and external validation procedures performed employing a wide series of statistical checks. In complete dataset, the qualitative models rendered classification accuracies between 97.04 and 99.93%, while the quantitative models yielded correlation (R(2)) values of 0.877-0.977 between the measured and the predicted endpoint values. The quantitative prediction accuracies for the higher molecular weight (MW) compounds (class 4) were relatively better than those for the low MW compounds. Both in the qualitative and quantitative models, the Polarizability was the most influential descriptor. Structural alerts responsible for the extreme adsorption behavior of the compounds were identified. Higher number of carbon and presence of higher halogens in a molecule rendered higher binding affinity. Proposed QSPR models performed well and outperformed the previous reports. A relatively better performance of the ensemble learning models (DTF, DTB) may be attributed to the strengths of the bagging and boosting algorithms which enhance the predictive accuracies. The proposed AI models can be useful tools in screening the chemicals for their binding affinities toward carbon for their safe management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption; Artificial intelligence; Binding affinity; Carbon; Industrial chemicals; QSPR models

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26160122     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4965-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  23 in total

1.  Quantum-Chemical Descriptors in QSAR/QSPR Studies.

Authors:  Mati Karelson; Victor S. Lobanov; Alan R. Katritzky
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1996-05-09       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Computational science. Materials scientists look to a data-intensive future.

Authors:  Robert F Service
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for prediction of sensory irritants (logRD50) of volatile organic chemicals.

Authors:  Feng Luan; Weiping Ma; Xiaoyun Zhang; Haixia Zhang; Mancan Liu; Zhide Hu; B T Fan
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 4.  The expanding role of predictive toxicology: an update on the (Q)SAR models for mutagens and carcinogens.

Authors:  Romualdo Benigni; Tatiana I Netzeva; Emilio Benfenati; Cecilia Bossa; Rainer Franke; Christoph Helma; Etje Hulzebos; Carol Marchant; Ann Richard; Yin-Tak Woo; Chihae Yang
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  A simple QSPR model for the prediction of the adsorbability of organic compounds onto activated carbon cloth.

Authors:  J Xu; L Zhu; D Fang; L Liu; Z Bai; L Wang; W Xu
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens.

Authors:  L M Shi; H Fang; W Tong; J Wu; R Perkins; R M Blair; W S Branham; S L Dial; C L Moland; D M Sheehan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

7.  Predicting carcinogenicity of diverse chemicals using probabilistic neural network modeling approaches.

Authors:  Kunwar P Singh; Shikha Gupta; Premanjali Rai
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Photolysis of mono- through deca-chlorinated biphenyls by ultraviolet irradiation in n-hexane and quantitative structure-property relationship analysis.

Authors:  Xue Li; Lei Fang; Jun Huang; Gang Yu
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.565

9.  QSTR modeling for qualitative and quantitative toxicity predictions of diverse chemical pesticides in honey bee for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Kunwar P Singh; Shikha Gupta; Nikita Basant; Dinesh Mohan
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Predicting acute aquatic toxicity of structurally diverse chemicals in fish using artificial intelligence approaches.

Authors:  Kunwar P Singh; Shikha Gupta; Premanjali Rai
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.