Literature DB >> 26158904

Can highly sensitive antimüllerian hormone testing predict failed response to ovarian stimulation?

Heather R Burks1, Lauren Ross1, Neisha Opper2, Erika Paulson1, Frank Z Stanczyk3, Karine Chung4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a newer commercially available antimüllerian hormone (AMH) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (picoAMH ELISA, AnshLabs) with a lower threshold of detection is predictive of successful ovarian stimulation in a population of women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR).
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
SETTING: University-based IVF program. PATIENT(S): Cases were patients whose first IVF cycle was cancelled for lack of ovarian response (<3 follicles; n = 24). Controls were patients with DOR (early follicular FSH of ≥10 IU/L), whose first cycle resulted in aspiration of at least 3 oocytes (n = 24). INTERVENTION(S): Frozen serum samples collected during routine clinical care between 2008 and 2012 before starting IVF were analyzed for AMH using the picoAMH ELISA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Serum AMH levels in patients who successfully reached oocyte retrieval compared with patients with a failed controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycle. Receiver operator curve analysis was used to identify a predictive threshold AMH value. RESULT(S): No demographic differences were found between groups. The successful group had a higher antral follicle count (8.5 vs. 6) and higher AMH levels (847 vs. 406 pg/mL). The AMH level correlated with the antral follicle count (R = 0.61). The AMH level of >500 pg/mL had 83.3% sensitivity and 70.8% specificity to detect patients who proceeded to successful oocyte retrieval. Below AMH levels of 100 pg/mL, no patients achieved oocyte retrieval. CONCLUSION(S): Due to a lower threshold of detection, picoAMH may be able to predict successful ovarian stimulation among women with DOR using a threshold of 500 pg/mL, with good sensitivity and specificity.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ovarian reserve; antimullerian hormone; in vitro fertilization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26158904     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  Demographic, lifestyle, and other factors in relation to antimüllerian hormone levels in mostly late premenopausal women.

Authors:  Seungyoun Jung; Naomi Allen; Alan A Arslan; Laura Baglietto; Louise A Brinton; Brian L Egleston; Roni Falk; Renée T Fortner; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Annika Idahl; Rudolph Kaaks; Eva Lundin; Melissa Merritt; Charlotte Onland-Moret; Sabina Rinaldi; María-José Sánchez; Sabina Sieri; Helena Schock; Xiao-Ou Shu; Patrick M Sluss; Paul N Staats; Ruth C Travis; Anne Tjønneland; Antonia Trichopoulou; Shelley Tworoger; Kala Visvanathan; Vittorio Krogh; Elisabete Weiderpass; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Wei Zheng; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Anti-Müllerian hormone and risk of ovarian cancer in nine cohorts.

Authors:  Seungyoun Jung; Naomi Allen; Alan A Arslan; Laura Baglietto; Aurelio Barricarte; Louise A Brinton; Brian L Egleston; Roni T Falk; Renée T Fortner; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Yutang Gao; Annika Idahl; Rudolph Kaaks; Vittorio Krogh; Melissa A Merritt; Eva Lundin; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Sabina Rinaldi; Helena Schock; Xiao-Ou Shu; Patrick M Sluss; Paul N Staats; Carlotta Sacerdote; Ruth C Travis; Anne Tjønneland; Antonia Trichopoulou; Shelley S Tworoger; Kala Visvanathan; Elisabete Weiderpass; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  An in silico model using prognostic genetic factors for ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review.

Authors:  B S Eisele; G C Villalba Silva; C Bessow; R Donato; V K Genro; J S Cunha-Filho
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Very Low Levels of Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone as a Possible Marker for Follicle Growth in Patients with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Under Hormone Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Yukiyo Kasahara; Satoko Osuka; Natsuki Nakanishi; Tomohiko Murase; Tomoko Nakamura; Maki Goto; Tomomi Kotani; Akira Iwase; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Prediction of metaphase II oocytes according to different serum Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in antagonist ICSI cycles.

Authors:  Joyce B da Silva; Tatiana R Panaino; Maria A Tamm; Paloma Lira; Patricia C F Arêas; Ana C A Mancebo; Marcelo M de Souza; Roberto A Antunes; Maria do Carmo B de Souza
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Anti-Mullerian hormone and endometrial cancer: a multi-cohort study.

Authors:  Renée T Fortner; Helena Schock; Seungyoun Jung; Naomi E Allen; Alan A Arslan; Louise A Brinton; Brian L Egleston; Roni T Falk; Marc J Gunter; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Annika Idahl; Theron S Johnson; Rudolf Kaaks; Vittorio Krogh; Eva Lundin; Melissa A Merritt; Carmen Navarro; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Domenico Palli; Xiao-Ou Shu; Patrick M Sluss; Paul N Staats; Antonia Trichopoulou; Elisabete Weiderpass; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Wei Zheng; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Age-specific anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels poorly affects cumulative live birth rate after intra-uterine insemination.

Authors:  Jessika Moreau; Nicolas Gatimel; Cynthia Simon; Clémentine Cohade; Florence Lesourd; Jean Parinaud; Roger Léandri
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.