Literature DB >> 28921520

Anti-Müllerian hormone and risk of ovarian cancer in nine cohorts.

Seungyoun Jung1, Naomi Allen2, Alan A Arslan3,4, Laura Baglietto5,6, Aurelio Barricarte7,8,9, Louise A Brinton10, Brian L Egleston11, Roni T Falk10, Renée T Fortner12, Kathy J Helzlsouer13,14, Yutang Gao15, Annika Idahl16, Rudolph Kaaks12, Vittorio Krogh17, Melissa A Merritt18, Eva Lundin19, N Charlotte Onland-Moret20, Sabina Rinaldi21, Helena Schock12, Xiao-Ou Shu22, Patrick M Sluss23, Paul N Staats24, Carlotta Sacerdote25, Ruth C Travis26, Anne Tjønneland27, Antonia Trichopoulou28,29, Shelley S Tworoger30,31, Kala Visvanathan14, Elisabete Weiderpass32,33,34,35, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte4, Joanne F Dorgan1.   

Abstract

Animal and experimental data suggest that anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) serves as a marker of ovarian reserve and inhibits the growth of ovarian tumors. However, few epidemiologic studies have examined the association between AMH and ovarian cancer risk. We conducted a nested case-control study of 302 ovarian cancer cases and 336 matched controls from nine cohorts. Prediagnostic blood samples of premenopausal women were assayed for AMH using a picoAMH enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression. AMH concentration was not associated with overall ovarian cancer risk. The multivariable-adjusted OR (95% CI), comparing the highest to the lowest quartile of AMH, was 0.99 (0.59-1.67) (Ptrend : 0.91). The association did not differ by age at blood draw or oral contraceptive use (all Pheterogeneity : ≥0.26). There also was no evidence for heterogeneity of risk for tumors defined by histologic developmental pathway, stage, and grade, and by age at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis (all Pheterogeneity : ≥0.39). In conclusion, this analysis of mostly late premenopausal women from nine cohorts does not support the hypothesized inverse association between prediagnostic circulating levels of AMH and risk of ovarian cancer.
© 2017 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-Müllerian hormone; epidemiology; ovarian cancer; ovarian function

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28921520      PMCID: PMC5749630          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  40 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian surface epithelium: biology, endocrinology, and pathology.

Authors:  N Auersperg; A S Wong; K C Choi; S K Kang; P C Leung
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Hormone dependency of breast tumours developing in the Guernsey Cohort study.

Authors:  I S Fentiman; A Hanby; D S Allen; T Key; E N Meilahn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Circulating levels of sex steroid hormones and risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Annekatrin Lukanova; Eva Lundin; Arslan Akhmedkhanov; Andrea Micheli; Sabina Rinaldi; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Per Lenner; Paola Muti; Carine Biessy; Vittorio Krogh; Franco Berrino; Göran Hallmans; Elio Riboli; Rudolf Kaaks; Paolo Toniolo
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Müllerian inhibiting substance type II receptor (MISIIR): a novel, tissue-specific target expressed by gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Giovanni Aletti; Kriste A Lewis; Gary L Keeney; Bijoy M Thomas; Isabelle Navarro-Teulon; William A Cliby
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Prediagnostic circulating follicle stimulating hormone concentrations and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Meghan A McSorley; Anthony J Alberg; Diane S Allen; Naomi E Allen; Louise A Brinton; Joanne F Dorgan; Rudolf Kaaks; Sabina Rinaldi; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Cardiovascular disease and diabetes in the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study Cohort - evaluation of risk factors and their interactions.

Authors:  Göran Hallmans; Asa Agren; Gerd Johansson; Anders Johansson; Birgitta Stegmayr; Jan-Håkan Jansson; Bernt Lindahl; Olle Rolandsson; Stefan Söderberg; Mats Nilsson; Ingegerd Johansson; Lars Weinehall
Journal:  Scand J Public Health Suppl       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Recombinant human Mullerian inhibiting substance inhibits long-term growth of MIS type II receptor-directed transgenic mouse ovarian cancers in vivo.

Authors:  Rafael Pieretti-Vanmarcke; Patricia K Donahoe; Paul Szotek; Thomas Manganaro; Mary K Lorenzen; James Lorenzen; Denise C Connolly; Elkan F Halpern; David T MacLaughlin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  A single-centre evaluation of two new anti-Mullerian hormone assays and comparison with the current clinical standard assay.

Authors:  Paul Welsh; Karen Smith; Scott M Nelson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The expression of Müllerian inhibiting substance/anti-Müllerian hormone type II receptor protein and mRNA in benign, borderline and malignant ovarian neoplasia.

Authors:  Jae Yen Song; Keun Young Chen; Sue Yeon Kim; Mee Ran Kim; Ki Sung Ryu; Jung Ho Cha; Chang Suk Kang; David T MacLaughlin; Jang Heub Kim
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.650

10.  Dietary cadmium exposure and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in a prospective cohort of Swedish women.

Authors:  B Julin; A Wolk; A Akesson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association of Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone, and Inhibin B with Risk of Ovarian Cancer in the Janus Serum Bank.

Authors:  Sarah R Irvin; Elisabete Weiderpass; Frank Z Stanczyk; Louise A Brinton; Britton Trabert; Hilde Langseth; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.254

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.