Literature DB >> 26158547

Radiation holidays stimulate tumor immunity.

Laura Surace1, Matthias Guckenberger2, Maries van den Broek1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26158547      PMCID: PMC4599217          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
Radiotherapy is a standard treatment for cancer and is used since a long time as a stand-alone therapy or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies including immunotherapy. Its acts through induction of irreversible DNA damage to which tumor cells are more susceptible because of frequent mutations in DNA repair pathways. Fractioned radiotherapy, given as daily low doses during multiple weeks, was established as standard protocol in the clinics because it allows recovery of normal tissues. Recently, new technologies were developed that more precisely target radiation to the tumor enabling the delivery of high doses in fewer fractions (hypofractionated or stereotactic radiotherapy) [1]. Recent data suggest that radiotherapy promotes an inflammatory response in the tumor, which supports tumor-specific immunity and actually, efficacy in pre-clinical models seems to depend on concomitant immune stimulation [2-4]. Inflammation is a useful response to disturbance including infection and tissue damage and is instrumental in clearing pathogens and necrotic cells as well as in tissue repair. Moreover, inflammation provides essential innate stimuli to the subsequent activation of protective adaptive immunity. Because inflammation is a potent and destructive response, it must be tightly regulated and resolve as soon as the trigger is eliminated. Acute inflammation is a relatively short and self-limiting process that culminates in the recruitment and activation of immune cells to the site of action through the production of growth factors, cytokines and chemokines. When the trigger is gone, the production of anti-inflammatory cells and factors terminates this process. In case of a persisting stimulus, which can be an infectious agent, cancer or chronic disturbance, the inflammatory reaction is not resolved but becomes chronic. In order to limit excessive tissue damage, the nature of the inflammatory responses changes under chronic conditions and displays features of simultaneous tissue destruction and repair, angiogenesis and immunosuppression. Chronic inflammation was correlated with cancer in 1858 by Virchow and is now considered an established hallmark for cancer [5]. Paradoxically, Coley reported in 1893 injection of heat-killed bacteria (Coley's toxin) resulted in tumor regression. This apparent contradiction may be explained by the nature of the inflammation: Chronic inflammation is tumor-promoting, whereas acute inflammation supports protective anti-tumor immunity [6]. Along this line, we showed in mice with established, syngeneic tumors that a single dose of 20 Gy controls tumor progression and promotes a local, transient activation of complement, a potent pro-inflammatory pathway. This resulted in local production of anaphylatoxins (C3a and C5a) that proved crucial to the stimulation of tumor-specific immunity and therapeutic efficacy [3]. When we treated mice with established tumors with fractions of 1.5 or 7 Gy delivered on 5 consecutive days tumor progression was inhibited as well, but neither increased infiltration by leukocytes, specifically CD8+ T cells, nor protective effector function of such T cells was observed in chronically irradiated tumors [3]. In addition, our data show that each dose induces complement activation, which results in a state of chronic activation if radiation is given over a prolonged time on consecutive days. The lack of increased infiltration by leukocytes and specifically of CD8+ T cells on the one hand and increased infiltration by regulatory T cells on the other hand after 5 irradiations can be explained by radiosensitivity of effector T cells that were recruited after the first dose and by immunosuppressive chronic inflammation resulting from multiple irradiations. These observations explain the apparently conflicting data by Elvington showing that inhibition of C3 activation improves the efficacy of fractionated radiotherapy [7]. Taken together, we propose that daily radiotherapy results in a chronic inflammatory phenotype that does not promote immune effector but rather regulatory T cells, whereas a single dose and presumably also to repeated doses given with yet to be determined interval results in repeated peaks of immune stimulating, acute inflammation. Although many aspects are still unknown and require further investigation, we speculate that irradiation with few radiotherapy fractions of higher dose and with a break between the fractions may result in superior therapeutic responses compared to daily treatments (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Avoiding chronic inflammation through the use of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy with radiation holidays

(A) Standard hyper-fractionated radiotherapy is given as daily fractions of 1.5-2 Gy during a prolonged period. This protocol results in chronic inflammation, which is immunosuppressive, supports angiogenesis and is a hallmark of progressive cancer. (B) We propose to give hypo-fractionated radiotherapy as isolated high-dose fractions with radiation holidays between the treatments. This protocol results in repeated peaks of acute inflammation, which stimulate protective immunity.

Avoiding chronic inflammation through the use of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy with radiation holidays

(A) Standard hyper-fractionated radiotherapy is given as daily fractions of 1.5-2 Gy during a prolonged period. This protocol results in chronic inflammation, which is immunosuppressive, supports angiogenesis and is a hallmark of progressive cancer. (B) We propose to give hypo-fractionated radiotherapy as isolated high-dose fractions with radiation holidays between the treatments. This protocol results in repeated peaks of acute inflammation, which stimulate protective immunity.
  7 in total

1.  Complement-dependent modulation of antitumor immunity following radiation therapy.

Authors:  Michelle Elvington; Melissa Scheiber; Xiaofeng Yang; Katherine Lyons; Dustin Jacqmin; Casey Wadsworth; David Marshall; Kenneth Vanek; Stephen Tomlinson
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole breast radiotherapy for breast cancer (TARGIT-A trial): an international, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Jayant S Vaidya; David J Joseph; Jeffrey S Tobias; Max Bulsara; Frederik Wenz; Christobel Saunders; Michael Alvarado; Henrik L Flyger; Samuele Massarut; Wolfgang Eiermann; Mohammed Keshtgar; John Dewar; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Marc Sütterlin; Laura Esserman; Helle M R Holtveg; Mario Roncadin; Steffi Pigorsch; Marinos Metaxas; Mary Falzon; April Matthews; Tammy Corica; Norman R Williams; Michael Baum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Radiotherapy promotes tumor-specific effector CD8+ T cells via dendritic cell activation.

Authors:  Anurag Gupta; Hans Christian Probst; Van Vuong; Alexandro Landshammer; Sabine Muth; Hideo Yagita; Reto Schwendener; Martin Pruschy; Alexander Knuth; Maries van den Broek
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Complement is a central mediator of radiotherapy-induced tumor-specific immunity and clinical response.

Authors:  Laura Surace; Veronika Lysenko; Andrea Orlando Fontana; Virginia Cecconi; Hans Janssen; Antonela Bicvic; Michal Okoniewski; Martin Pruschy; Reinhard Dummer; Jacques Neefjes; Alexander Knuth; Anurag Gupta; Maries van den Broek
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 5.  Neutralizing tumor-promoting chronic inflammation: a magic bullet?

Authors:  Lisa M Coussens; Laurence Zitvogel; A Karolina Palucka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Radiotherapy of human sarcoma promotes an intratumoral immune effector signature.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Beata Bode; Gabriela Studer; Holger Moch; Michal Okoniewski; Alexander Knuth; Lotta von Boehmer; Maries van den Broek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Impacts of Ionizing Radiation on the Different Compartments of the Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Natacha Leroi; François Lallemand; Philippe Coucke; Agnès Noel; Philippe Martinive
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Radiation Exposure-Induced Changes in the Immune Cells and Immune Factors of Mice With or Without Primary Lung Tumor.

Authors:  Shuxian Pan; Jingjie Wang; Anqing Wu; Ziyang Guo; Ziyang Wang; Lijun Zheng; Yingchu Dai; Lin Zhu; Jing Nie; Tom K Hei; Guangming Zhou; Youchen Li; Bingyan Li; Wentao Hu
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.658

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.