Literature DB >> 20570343

Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole breast radiotherapy for breast cancer (TARGIT-A trial): an international, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial.

Jayant S Vaidya1, David J Joseph, Jeffrey S Tobias, Max Bulsara, Frederik Wenz, Christobel Saunders, Michael Alvarado, Henrik L Flyger, Samuele Massarut, Wolfgang Eiermann, Mohammed Keshtgar, John Dewar, Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher, Marc Sütterlin, Laura Esserman, Helle M R Holtveg, Mario Roncadin, Steffi Pigorsch, Marinos Metaxas, Mary Falzon, April Matthews, Tammy Corica, Norman R Williams, Michael Baum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After breast-conserving surgery, 90% of local recurrences occur within the index quadrant despite the presence of multicentric cancers elsewhere in the breast. Thus, restriction of radiation therapy to the tumour bed during surgery might be adequate for selected patients. We compared targeted intraoperative radiotherapy with the conventional policy of whole breast external beam radiotherapy.
METHODS: Having safely piloted the new technique of single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy with Intrabeam, we launched the TARGIT-A trial on March 24, 2000. In this prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial, women aged 45 years or older with invasive ductal breast carcinoma undergoing breast-conserving surgery were enrolled from 28 centres in nine countries. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive targeted intraoperative radiotherapy or whole breast external beam radiotherapy, with blocks stratified by centre and by timing of delivery of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy. Neither patients nor investigators or their teams were masked to treatment assignment. Postoperative discovery of predefined factors (eg, lobular carcinoma) could trigger addition of external beam radiotherapy to targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (in an expected 15% of patients). The primary outcome was local recurrence in the conserved breast. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an absolute difference of 2.5% in the primary endpoint. All randomised patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00983684.
FINDINGS: 1113 patients were randomly allocated to targeted intraoperative radiotherapy and 1119 were allocated to external beam radiotherapy. Of 996 patients who received the allocated treatment in the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy group, 854 (86%) received targeted intraoperative radiotherapy only and 142 (14%) received targeted intraoperative radiotherapy plus external beam radiotherapy. 1025 (92%) patients in the external beam radiotherapy group received the allocated treatment. At 4 years, there were six local recurrences in the intraoperative radiotherapy group and five in the external beam radiotherapy group. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of local recurrence in the conserved breast at 4 years was 1.20% (95% CI 0.53-2.71) in the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy and 0.95% (0.39-2.31) in the external beam radiotherapy group (difference between groups 0.25%, -1.04 to 1.54; p=0.41). The frequency of any complications and major toxicity was similar in the two groups (for major toxicity, targeted intraoperative radiotherapy, 37 [3.3%] of 1113 vs external beam radiotherapy, 44 [3.9%] of 1119; p=0.44). Radiotherapy toxicity (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3) was lower in the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy group (six patients [0.5%]) than in the external beam radiotherapy group (23 patients [2.1%]; p=0.002).
INTERPRETATION: For selected patients with early breast cancer, a single dose of radiotherapy delivered at the time of surgery by use of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy should be considered as an alternative to external beam radiotherapy delivered over several weeks. FUNDING: University College London Hospitals (UCLH)/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, UCLH Charities, National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, Ninewells Cancer Campaign, National Health and Medical Research Council, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20570343     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60837-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  199 in total

Review 1.  Gold nanoparticles as novel agents for cancer therapy.

Authors:  S Jain; D G Hirst; J M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  AGO Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Update 2011.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssen; Anton Scharl; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Ultra-targeted APBI using TARGIT--a cautionary note.

Authors:  Rajiv Sarin
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Ionizing radiations increase the activity of the cell surface glycohydrolases and the plasma membrane ceramide content.

Authors:  Massimo Aureli; Rosaria Bassi; Alessandro Prinetti; Elena Chiricozzi; Brigida Pappalardi; Vanna Chigorno; Nadia Di Muzio; Nicoletta Loberto; Sandro Sonnino
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 5.  Partial breast irradiation techniques in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Agata Kacprowska; Jacek Jassem
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-10-14

6.  Racial disparities in travel time to radiotherapy facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Shannon Graham; Randall Young; Brian Lewis; Barry Flanagan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Intraoperative radiotherapy and cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Five consecutive case reports of locally advanced rectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Y L B Klaver; V E P P Lemmens; S W Nienhuijs; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; H J T Rutten; I H J T de Hingh
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Patterns of use and short-term complications of breast brachytherapy in the national medicare population from 2008-2009.

Authors:  Carolyn J Presley; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Kenneth B Roberts; James B Yu; Brigid Killelea; Beth-Ann Lesnikoski; Jessica B Long; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  RTOG 95-17, a Phase II trial to evaluate brachytherapy as the sole method of radiation therapy for Stage I and II breast carcinoma--year-5 toxicity and cosmesis.

Authors:  Rachel Rabinovitch; Kathryn Winter; Robert Kuske; John Bolton; Doug Arthur; Troy Scroggins; Frank Vicini; Beryl McCormick; Julia White
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Breast cancer: Actual methods of treatment and future trends.

Authors:  Paweł Murawa; Dawid Murawa; Beata Adamczyk; Karol Połom
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.