Literature DB >> 26158113

Comparison of retinal image evaluation techniques in novice clinicians.

Christopher M Putnam1, Alex Permann1, Carl J Bassi1.   

Abstract

Retinal fundus evaluation is learned through experience and training. This study aimed to determine the image presentation characteristics and the accompanying evaluation techniques, which led to the most accurate and efficient retinal pathology detection method. Phase I included 25 novice clinicians asked to evaluate 14 different pathologies using spatial versus temporal image presentations. Phase II included 25 different novice clinicians asked to evaluate five different simulated pathologies at three different pixel sizes presented in both spatial and temporal image presentations. Accuracy and speed of recognition were evaluated between the spatial and temporal presentations of the same simulated pathology. In phase l, subjects were significantly faster at simulated pathology detection using a temporal presentation with a 95% accuracy rate versus a spatial presentation with a 79% accuracy rate. In phase II, subjects demonstrated significant differences in speed of detection using the temporal technique at all 3 pixel number sizes with the greatest difference in detection times shown at the smallest retinal defects. Accuracy and speed of recognition in simulated pathology assessment were improved in a temporal presentation and the greatest improvements were demonstrated at the smallest pixel numbers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  retina pathology; spatial image evaluation; temporal image evaluation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26158113      PMCID: PMC4478767          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.2.025502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  15 in total

Review 1.  Review of the use of digital imaging in retinopathy of prematurity screening.

Authors:  Erin M Salcone; Suzanne Johnston; Deborah VanderVeen
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.975

2.  Automated alternation flicker for the detection of optic disc haemorrhages.

Authors:  Zeba A Syed; Nathan M Radcliffe; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Scott D Smith; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Diagnosis of early glaucoma with flicker comparisons of serial disc photographs.

Authors:  A Heijl; B Bengtsson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Optic disc evaluation in optic neuropathies: the optic disc assessment project.

Authors:  Evelyn C O'Neill; Helen V Danesh-Meyer; George X Y Kong; Alex W Hewitt; Michael A Coote; David A Mackey; Jonathan G Crowston
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Comparing the detection and agreement of parapapillary atrophy progression using digital optic disk photographs and alternation flicker.

Authors:  Brian L VanderBeek; Scott D Smith; Nathan M Radcliffe
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Flicker comparison of fundus photographs. A technical note.

Authors:  B Bengtsson; C E Krakau
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1979-06

7.  Estimated retinal ganglion cell counts in glaucomatous eyes with localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects.

Authors:  Andrew J Tatham; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Giant choroidal nevus clinical features and natural course in 322 cases.

Authors:  Helen K Li; Carol L Shields; Arman Mashayekhi; Jessica D Randolph; Tehara Bailey; Jake Burnbaum; Jerry A Shields
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Concordance of flicker comparison versus side-by-side comparison in glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael Cymbor; Lindsey Lear; Matthew Mastrine
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2009-08

10.  Association of blood and ocular perfusion pressure with structural glaucomatous progression by flicker chronoscopy.

Authors:  Margaret M McGlynn; Joshua R Ehrlich; Elizabeth D Marlow; Ru-Ik Chee; Fabiana Q Silva; Sarah H Van Tassel; Nathan M Radcliffe
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.