Anuja Roy1, Jonathan K Kish2, Lisa Bloudek3, David S Siegel4, Sundar Jagannath5, Denise Globe6, Emil T Kuriakose7, Kristen Migliaccio-Walle8. 1. Associate Director, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ. 2. Manager, Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Xcenda, Palm Harbor, FL. 3. Assistant Director, Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Xcenda, Palm Harbor, FL. 4. Chief of the Myeloma Division, Hackensack University Medical Center, NJ. 5. Director of the Multiple Myeloma Program and Professor of Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York. 6. Executive Director, US Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ. 7. Medical Director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ. 8. Director, Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Xcenda, Palm Harbor, FL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a progressive cancer for which there is no cure. Despite treatment, almost all patients eventually experience periods of disease relapse and remission. With the increasing use of novel therapies, including bortezomib, lenalidomide, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and panobinostat, benchmarks for assessing the value of these therapies in treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are needed for physicians and payers alike. OBJECTIVES: To develop a model framework and to calculate an annual estimate of the total costs per patient for the treatment of patients with RRMM using 7 common treatment regimens, including bortezomib plus dexamethasone; panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; lenalidomide plus dexamethasone; lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; carfilzomib; carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone; and pomalidomide plus dexamethasone. METHODS: The expenditures for drugs and their administration, for prophylaxis and adverse event monitoring, and for the treatment of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were included in the calculations of the total pharmacy and medical costs. The drug costs were based on published pricing and labeled dosing schedules; the adverse event prophylaxis and monitoring costs were obtained from peer-reviewed publications; and the adverse event incidence rates were obtained from each regimen's prescribing information and from clinical trials. All the costs were summed over the duration of therapy for which the drugs were administered and were calculated separately for commercial and Medicare plans. The duration of therapy for each regimen was the time for which a patient had to be receiving the regimen to obtain 12 months of progression-free survival based on the duration-of-therapy to progression-free survival ratio observed from published clinical trials and/or the drug's labeling. RESULTS: The pharmacy costs were highest for pomalidomide plus dexamethasone, whereas the medical costs were highest for the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. The total cost associated with available treatments for RRMM was highest for regimens that included lenalidomide (approximate range, $126,000-$256,000). Only bortezomib plus dexamethasone and the combination of panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone had total costs that were lower than $125,000 per patient. CONCLUSION: This study represents the first model developed to comprehensively estimate the costs of managing RRMM with all currently approved and guideline-recommended regimens in the United States. As such, it provides the framework and basis for further budget impact analyses and for cost-effectiveness comparisons with these regimens.
BACKGROUND:Multiple myeloma is a progressive cancer for which there is no cure. Despite treatment, almost all patients eventually experience periods of disease relapse and remission. With the increasing use of novel therapies, including bortezomib, lenalidomide, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and panobinostat, benchmarks for assessing the value of these therapies in treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are needed for physicians and payers alike. OBJECTIVES: To develop a model framework and to calculate an annual estimate of the total costs per patient for the treatment of patients with RRMM using 7 common treatment regimens, including bortezomib plus dexamethasone; panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; lenalidomide plus dexamethasone; lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; carfilzomib; carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone; and pomalidomide plus dexamethasone. METHODS: The expenditures for drugs and their administration, for prophylaxis and adverse event monitoring, and for the treatment of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were included in the calculations of the total pharmacy and medical costs. The drug costs were based on published pricing and labeled dosing schedules; the adverse event prophylaxis and monitoring costs were obtained from peer-reviewed publications; and the adverse event incidence rates were obtained from each regimen's prescribing information and from clinical trials. All the costs were summed over the duration of therapy for which the drugs were administered and were calculated separately for commercial and Medicare plans. The duration of therapy for each regimen was the time for which a patient had to be receiving the regimen to obtain 12 months of progression-free survival based on the duration-of-therapy to progression-free survival ratio observed from published clinical trials and/or the drug's labeling. RESULTS: The pharmacy costs were highest for pomalidomide plus dexamethasone, whereas the medical costs were highest for the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. The total cost associated with available treatments for RRMM was highest for regimens that included lenalidomide (approximate range, $126,000-$256,000). Only bortezomib plus dexamethasone and the combination of panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone had total costs that were lower than $125,000 per patient. CONCLUSION: This study represents the first model developed to comprehensively estimate the costs of managing RRMM with all currently approved and guideline-recommended regimens in the United States. As such, it provides the framework and basis for further budget impact analyses and for cost-effectiveness comparisons with these regimens.
Authors: Maria-Victoria Mateos; Paul G Richardson; Rudolf Schlag; Nuriet K Khuageva; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Ofer Shpilberg; Martin Kropff; Ivan Spicka; Maria T Petrucci; Antonio Palumbo; Olga S Samoilova; Anna Dmoszynska; Kudrat M Abdulkadyrov; Rik Schots; Bin Jiang; Dixie L Esseltine; Kevin Liu; Andrew Cakana; Helgi van de Velde; Jesús F San Miguel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maria T Petrucci; Pilar Giraldo; Paolo Corradini; Adriana Teixeira; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Igor W Blau; Johannes Drach; Ralf Angermund; Nathalie Allietta; Esther Broer; Vivien Mitchell; Joan Bladé Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Ruben Niesvizky; Paul G Richardson; S Vincent Rajkumar; Morton Coleman; Laura Rosiñol; Pieter Sonneveld; Michael W Schuster; David Irwin; Edward A Stadtmauer; Thierry Facon; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Anthony L Boral; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Kenneth C Anderson; Joan Bladé Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: M A Dimopoulos; C Chen; A Spencer; R Niesvizky; M Attal; E A Stadtmauer; M T Petrucci; Z Yu; M Olesnyckyj; J B Zeldis; R D Knight; D M Weber Journal: Leukemia Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Wanling Xie; Sundar Jagannath; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Sagar Lonial; Noopur S Raje; Melissa Alsina; Irene M Ghobrial; Robert L Schlossman; Nikhil C Munshi; Amitabha Mazumder; David H Vesole; Jonathan L Kaufman; Kathleen Colson; Mary McKenney; Laura E Lunde; John Feather; Michelle E Maglio; Diane Warren; Dixil Francis; Teru Hideshima; Robert Knight; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Constantine S Mitsiades; Edie Weller; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Blood Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: S K Kumar; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; M A Gertz; F K Buadi; S Pandey; P Kapoor; D Dingli; S R Hayman; N Leung; J Lust; A McCurdy; S J Russell; S R Zeldenrust; R A Kyle; S V Rajkumar Journal: Leukemia Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: R Chakraborty; E Muchtar; S K Kumar; F K Buadi; D Dingli; A Dispenzieri; S R Hayman; W J Hogan; P Kapoor; M Q Lacy; N Leung; R Warsame; T Kourelis; W Gonsalves; M A Gertz Journal: Leukemia Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Abdulaali R Almutairi; Nimer S Alkhatib; Mok Oh; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Hani M Babiker; Lee D Cranmer; Ali McBride; Ivo Abraham Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Alicia K Morgans; Thomas Hutson; Alice Kai Dan Guan; David Garcia; Anna Zhou; Edward Drea; Nicholas J Vogelzang Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Anuja Roy; Jonathan K Kish; Lisa Bloudek; David S Siegel; Sundar Jagannath; Denise Globe; Emil T Kuriakose; Kristen Migliaccio-Walle Journal: Am Health Drug Benefits Date: 2015-06
Authors: Hedwig M Blommestein; Margreet G Franken; Chrissy H Y van Beurden-Tan; Nicole M A Blijlevens; Peter C Huijgens; Pieter Sonneveld; Carin A Uyl-de Groot; Sonja Zweegman Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: Kaustuv Bhattacharya; John P Bentley; Sujith Ramachandran; Yunhee Chang; Benjamin F Banahan; Ruchit Shah; Nickhill Bhakta; Yi Yang Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-07-01