| Literature DB >> 26157225 |
Takeshi Imura1, Yuki Nagasawa1, Tetsuji Inagawa2, Naoki Imada1, Hiroaki Izumi3, Katsuya Emoto2, Itaru Tani2, Hiroyuki Yamasaki2, Yuichiro Ota2, Shuichi Oki2, Tadanori Maeda3, Osamu Araki2.
Abstract
[Purpose] The efficacy of diffusion tensor imaging in the prediction of motor outcomes and activities of daily living function remains unclear. We evaluated the most appropriate diffusion tensor parameters and methodology to determine whether the region of interest- or tractography-based method was more useful for predicting motor outcomes and activities of daily living function in stroke patients. <br> [Subjects and Methods] Diffusion tensor imaging data within 10 days after stroke onset were collected and analyzed for 25 patients. The corticospinal tract was analyzed. Fractional anisotropy, number of fibers, and apparent diffusion coefficient were used as diffusion tensor parameters. Motor outcomes and activities of daily living function were evaluated on the same day as diffusion tensor imaging and at 1 month post-onset. <br> [Results] The fractional anisotropy value of the affected corticospinal tract significantly correlated with the motor outcome and activities of daily living function within 10 days post-onset and at 1 month post-onset. Tthere were no significant correlations between other diffusion tensor parameters and motor outcomes or activities of daily living function. <br> [Conclusion] The fractional anisotropy value of the affected corticospinal tract obtained using the tractography-based method was useful for predicting motor outcomes and activities of daily living function in stroke patients.Entities:
Keywords: Activities of daily living function; Diffusion tensor tractography; Stroke
Year: 2015 PMID: 26157225 PMCID: PMC4483403 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.1383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Fig. 1.Location of the ROIs in the corticospinal tract in a normal healthy subject. The first ROI is set at the cerebral peduncle and the second ROI is set at the precentral gyrus.
Correlation between the FA value of the affected CST and clinical outcome within 10 days postonset
| Motor outcome | rs | |
|---|---|---|
| MI-UE | 0.57 | * |
| MI-LE | 0.66 | * |
| BR-UE | 0.66 | * |
| BR-F | 0.50 | * |
| BR-LE | 0.66 | * |
| ADL function | rs | |
| BI | 0.69 | * |
| BI-gait | 0.60 | * |
| FIM | 0.66 | * |
| FIM-M | 0.65 | * |
| FIM-gait | 0.48 | * |
MI: motricity index; UE: upper extremity; LE: lower extremity; BR: brunnstrom stage; F: finger; ADL: activities of daily living; BI: barthel index; FIM: functional independence measure; FIM-M: motor items of functional independence measure *: p < 0.05
Correlation between the FA value of the affected CST and clinical outcome at 1 month postonset
| Motor outcome | rs | |
|---|---|---|
| MI-UE | 0.65 | * |
| MI-LE | 0.60 | * |
| BR-UE | 0.61 | * |
| BR-F | 0.60 | * |
| BR-LE | 0.69 | * |
| ADL function | rs | |
| BI | 0.72 | * |
| BI-gait | 0.65 | * |
| FIM | 0.71 | * |
| FIM-M | 0.68 | * |
| FIM-gait | 0.67 | * |
MI: motricity index; UE: upper extremity; LE: lower extremity; BR: brunnstrom stage; F: finger; ADL: activities of daily living; BI: barthel index; FIM: functional independence measure; FIM-M: motor items of functional independence measure *: p < 0.05