Literature DB >> 23652266

Decreased corticospinal tract fractional anisotropy predicts long-term motor outcome after stroke.

Josep Puig1, Gerard Blasco, Josep Daunis-I-Estadella, Götz Thomalla, Mar Castellanos, Jaume Figueras, Sebastián Remollo, Cecile van Eendenburg, Javier Sánchez-González, Joaquín Serena, Salvador Pedraza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Nearly 50% of patients have residual motor deficits after stroke, and long-term motor outcome is difficult to predict. We assessed the predictive value of axonal damage to the corticospinal tract indexed by diffusion tensor imaging fractional anisotropy for long-term motor outcome.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with middle cerebral artery stroke underwent multimodal MRI, including diffusion tensor imaging ≤12 hours, 3 days, and 30 days after onset. Clinical severity, infarct volume, location of corticospinal tract damage on diffusion tensor tractography, and ratios of fractional anisotropy (rFA) between affected and unaffected sides of the corticospinal tract at the pons were evaluated. Severity of motor deficit at 2 years was categorized using the Motricity Index as no deficit (Motricity Index, 100), slight-moderate deficit (Motricity Index, 99-50), or severe deficit (Motricity Index, <50).
RESULTS: We evaluated 70 patients (28 women; 72±12 years). rFA values at day 30 correlated with the degree of motor deficit at 2 years (P<0.001). rFA at day 30 was the only independent predictor of long-term motor outcome (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.03; P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the cutoffs rFA<0.982 for predicting slight-moderate deficit and rFA<0.689 for severe deficit were 94.4%, 84.6%, 73.9%, and 97.1%, respectively, and 100%, 83.3%, 81.3%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: rFA at day 30 is an independent predictor of long-term motor outcome after stroke.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebral ischemia; diffusion tensor imaging; fractional anisotropy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23652266     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  51 in total

Review 1.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic biomarker for motor recovery and rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Josep Puig; Gerard Blasco; Gottfried Schlaug; Cathy M Stinear; Pepus Daunis-I-Estadella; Carles Biarnes; Jaume Figueras; Joaquín Serena; Maria Hernández-Pérez; Angel Alberich-Bayarri; Mar Castellanos; David S Liebeskind; Andrew M Demchuk; Bijoy K Menon; Götz Thomalla; Kambiz Nael; Max Wintermark; Salvador Pedraza
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Proprioception and motor performance after stroke: An examination of diffusion properties in sensory and motor pathways.

Authors:  Sonja E Findlater; Erin L Mazerolle; G Bruce Pike; Sean P Dukelow
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Structural connectome disruption at baseline predicts 6-months post-stroke outcome.

Authors:  Amy Kuceyeski; Babak B Navi; Hooman Kamel; Ashish Raj; Norman Relkin; Joan Toglia; Costantino Iadecola; Michael O'Dell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Age is negatively associated with upper limb recovery after conventional but not robotic rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a secondary analysis of a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesca Cecchi; Marco Germanotta; Claudio Macchi; Angelo Montesano; Silvia Galeri; Manuela Diverio; Catiuscia Falsini; Monica Martini; Rita Mosca; Emanuele Langone; Dionysia Papadopoulou; Maria Chiara Carrozza; Irene Aprile
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  A comparison of seven different DTI-derived estimates of corticospinal tract structural characteristics in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Bokkyu Kim; Beth E Fisher; Nicolas Schweighofer; Richard M Leahy; Justin P Haldar; Soyoung Choi; Dorsa B Kay; James Gordon; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Predicting future brain tissue loss from white matter connectivity disruption in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Amy Kuceyeski; Hooman Kamel; Babak B Navi; Ashish Raj; Costantino Iadecola
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Advances in stroke: Imaging 2013.

Authors:  Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Chelsea S Kidwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  The Serum BDNF Level Offers Minimum Predictive Value for Motor Function Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Wenshu Luo; Tao Liu; Shanshan Li; Hongmei Wen; Fenghua Zhou; Ross Zafonte; Xun Luo; Minghzu Xu; Randie Black-Schaffer; Lisa J Wood; Yulong Wang; Qing Mei Wang
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.829

10.  Progressive recruitment of contralesional cortico-reticulospinal pathways drives motor impairment post stroke.

Authors:  Jacob G McPherson; Albert Chen; Michael D Ellis; Jun Yao; C J Heckman; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.