[Purpose] This study attempted to assess the impact of pain on the life of breast cancer survivors using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). [Subjects and Methods] A cross-sectional study was conducted. Participants comprised 30 women, aged 30-80 years, who had received treatment for breast cancer (surgery and complementary treatment) at least 12 months prior to the study and had reported chronic pain related to the treatment procedures. [Results] The highest scores were found for "mood" (median: 5.00 points; first quartile: 1.00 points; third quartile: 7.25 points), "normal work" (median: 5.00 points; first quartile: 0.00 points; third quartile: 8.00 points), and "sleep" (median: 4.50 points, first quartile: 0.00 points, third quartile: 8.00 points). [Conclusion] Pain exerts a negative impact primarily on mood, normal work, and sleep among breast cancer survivors.
[Purpose] This study attempted to assess the impact of pain on the life of breast cancer survivors using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). [Subjects and Methods] A cross-sectional study was conducted. Participants comprised 30 women, aged 30-80 years, who had received treatment for breast cancer (surgery and complementary treatment) at least 12 months prior to the study and had reported chronic pain related to the treatment procedures. [Results] The highest scores were found for "mood" (median: 5.00 points; first quartile: 1.00 points; third quartile: 7.25 points), "normal work" (median: 5.00 points; first quartile: 0.00 points; third quartile: 8.00 points), and "sleep" (median: 4.50 points, first quartile: 0.00 points, third quartile: 8.00 points). [Conclusion]Pain exerts a negative impact primarily on mood, normal work, and sleep among breast cancer survivors.
Women with breast cancer—who have undergone standard medical treatment, i.e., surgery,
chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy—commonly experience pain as a consequence of these
interventions1). The anterior and/or
lateral region of the thorax, axilla, and upper limbs are the anatomic sites most often
affected by pain in such cases2). This pain
is generally chronic, lasting more than three months, and requires the attention of
different healthcare professionals, including a physiotherapist3).For the assessment of pain experienced by breast cancer survivors, recent studies have
employed algometry4), the Numerical Rating
Scale5), Visual Analog Scale3), Catastrophizing Scale6) and McGill Pain Questionnaire7). However, pain is a complex, multidimensional phenomenon, especially
for this group of patients. Its interpretation involves different clinical aspects,
including a psychophysical approach that addresses functional, qualitative, subjective,
emotional, motivational, and cultural components8,
9).Information gleaned through studies categorize pain experienced by breast cancer survivors
can help healthcare professionals customize clinical approach and interventions, catering to
patients’ specific needs. Ferreira et al.10) found that most patients experienced constant daily pain that began
soon after the surgical procedure. Fabro et al.11) found that pain was more frequently experienced by young women
subjected to axillary lymph node dissection. According to De Oliveira et al.7), a large proportion of breast cancer
survivors categorize their pain as “tenderness,” “aching,” “shooting,” and
“tiring-exhausting.” Considering its multidimensional nature, other relevant aspects of pain
still need to be characterized in this population of patients.By investigating the impact of pain among breast cancer survivors and their lives using the
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), this study can help physiotherapists design pain management
strategies to address common signs and symptoms.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The present study’s procedures were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the
Nursing School of Ribeirão Preto (University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil) under
process number 162/2007. The study objective and procedures were explained to patients;
those agreeing to participate signed a statement of informed consent.Thirty women enrolled at the Breast Cancer Teaching, Research and Rehabilitation Center of
the Nursing School of Ribeirão Preto were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Inclusion
criteria were: being 30–80 years of age, having received treatment for breast cancer
(surgery and complementary treatment) at least 12 months before the study, and having
reported chronic treatment-related pain. The exclusion criteria were receiving surgical or
complementary (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) treatment during the study period, recurrence
and/or metastasis, and a diagnosis of neurological disorder, osteoarticular disorder, and/or
fibromyalgia. All recruited women met the eligibility criteria and were selected.The BPI was administered to evaluate pain and its impact on patients’ lives. This
questionnaire was developed by Cleeland and Ryan12) and has been validated for use on the Brazilian population13). The BPI is divided into a sensory
dimension and a reactive dimension (interference of pain in the patient’s life). The
reactive dimension consists of the following items: “general activities,” “mood,” “walking
ability,” “normal work,” “relationships with others,” “sleep,” and “enjoyment of life.” The
interference of pain is scored on an 11-point scale, where 0 represents “the absence of pain
or interference” and 10 represents “as bad as it can be.” Only the reactive dimension was
employed, as the purpose was to evaluate the impact of pain on the daily lives of breast
cancer survivors. A physiotherapist who was familiar with the BPI administered the
questionnaire in an interview format without time constraints in a private, well-lit,
climate-controlled room.For data analyses, simple descriptive statistical analysis were performed. The Shapiro-Wilk
test determined non-normal data distribution. Thus, the data were expressed in terms of
minimum, maximum, median, first quartile, and third quartile. The SPSS version 17.0
(Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.
RESULTS
The participants’ mean age was 55.69±11.46 years (range: 32.18–79.30 years). Twenty-four of
the 30 participants had received chemotherapy and 23 had received radiotherapy. Fifteen
participants had undergone mastectomy and 15, lumpectomy. Fifteen had surgery on the right
side, fourteen had surgery on the left side, and one had bilateral surgery. Moreover, all
except one had undergone axillary node clearance. The mean time since the procedure was
4.08±4.31 years.Table 1 displays the breast cancer survivors’ scores for items on the BPI. The highest
median values were found for “mood,” “normal work,” and “sleep.”
Table 1.
Central tendency and dispersion values for the breast cancer survivors’ responses
to the Brief Pain Inventory items
Items
MinV
MaxV
FQt
TQt
Md
General activities
0.00
10.00
0.00
4.25
0.50
Mood
0.00
10.00
1.00
7.25
5.00
Walking ability
0.00
10.00
0.00
4.25
0.00
Normal work
0.00
10.00
0.00
8.00
5.00
Relationships with others
0.00
10.00
0.00
5.00
0.00
Sleep
0.00
10.00
0.00
8.00
4.50
Enjoyment of life
0.00
10.00
0.00
6.50
3.00
MinV: minimum value; MaxV: maximum value; FQt: first quartile; TQt: third quartile;
Md: median
MinV: minimum value; MaxV: maximum value; FQt: first quartile; TQt: third quartile;
Md: median
DISCUSSION
In the present study, “mood,” “normal work,” and “sleep,” items of the BPI were aspects of
the breast cancer survivors’ lives that were most impacted by pain. The importance of this
study lies in the need to understand how pain affects breast cancerpatients so that
therapeutic approaches, based on the actual needs of women, can be established.Recent clinical trials conducted with breast cancer survivors have mainly investigated the
effect of physiotherapeutic programs on pain intensity and the pressure pain threshold.
Cantarero-Villanueva et al.3) found a
greater reduction in pain intensity in the neck, shoulders, and axillae following an aquatic
physical therapy program in comparison with standard care. Fernández-Lao et al.4) reported that a multidimensional program
involving strengthening exercises and massage as the major components was more effective in
terms of improving neck and shoulder pain and reducing widespread pressure hyperalgesia in
comparison to standard treatments. Silva et al.14) found that transcutaneous electrical neural stimulation promote
electrical modification in the parietal region and a decrease in pain in patients with
intercostobrachial pain after breast cancer surgery. Therefore, future studies should
consider the use of the BPI to allow better identification of the effects of
physiotherapeutic treatment regarding other dimensions of pain among cancerpatients.These findings underscore the importance of considering those aspects of living that are
compromised by pain when evaluating and developing treatment plans. Moreover,
Galiano-Castillo et al.15) reported that
depressed mood is associated with the level of physical activity, perceived shoulder pain,
fatigue, and muscle strain in breast cancer survivors. Ha and Choi16) found that proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation
exercises helped lower depression and anxiety rates in breast cancer survivors.
Castro-Sánchez et al.17) found that manual
therapy effectively improved sleep quality in individuals with fibromyalgia syndrome.
Similarly, Eadie et al.18) found that a
physiotherapy program led to improved sleep quality in individuals with chronic low back
pain. Thus, based on these studies, physical therapy interventions can act on the
relationship between pain, mood, and sleep.Regarding the influence of pain on work, we emphasize the importance of the
physiotherapist’s role. According to Phillips et al.19), a physiotherapeutic program for improving the physical health
status of patients with pain significantly helps reduce work-related problems and costs.
Thus, any physiotherapeutic approach first requires a complete patient history that
identifies labor activities and activities of daily living to establish effective
interventions that promote physical autonomy. This can result in improved functioning and
rehabilitation.Recent studies have employed the BPI in other groups of patients with cancer. An
investigation involving colorectal cancer survivors yielded similar results, with a moderate
influence of pain on mood, normal work, and sleep20). Scarpi et al.21)
used the BPI to assess pain in patients with bone metastases and found that pain
considerably interfered with walking ability. In the present study, pain did not interfere
with walking among breast cancer survivors as much as it did in previous studies, probably
because breast cancer is related to trunk and upper limb impairments. Therefore, each type
of cancer involves different areas and aspects of pain that in turn influence various
aspects of life.The present study’s limitations should be considered. A convenience sample was used. No
measurement of pain was conducted prior to breast cancer treatment. Further, the study only
focused on the characterization of pain and no comparisons were made with a control group,
nor were other statistical approaches used.In conclusion, pain exerts a negative impact mainly on mood, normal work, and sleep among
breast cancer survivors.
Authors: Christine Miaskowski; Steven M Paul; Bruce Cooper; Claudia West; Jon D Levine; Charles Elboim; Deborah Hamolsky; Gary Abrams; Judith Luce; Anand Dhruva; Dale J Langford; John D Merriman; Kord Kober; Christina Baggott; Heather Leutwyler; Bradley E Aouizerat Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Adelaida M Castro-Sánchez; María E Aguilar-Ferrándiz; Guillermo A Matarán-Peñarrocha; María Del Mar Sánchez-Joya; Manuel Arroyo-Morales; César Fernández-de-las-Peñas Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Orlando Carlos G Colhado; Hilze B O Moura-Siqueira; Débora Fernanda A Pedrosa; Simone Saltareli; Talita de Cássia Raminelli da Silva; Priscilla Hortense; Fátima A E Faleiros Sousa Journal: Pain Med Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Gildasio S De Oliveira; Ray Chang; Seema A Khan; Nora M Hansen; Jamil H Khan; Robert J McCarthy; Apkar V Apkarian Journal: Breast J Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Deborah J Bowen; Eileen H Shinn; Sophie Gregrowski; Gretchen Kimmick; Laura S Dominici; Elizabeth S Frank; Karen Lisa Smith; Gabrielle Rocque; Kathryn J Ruddy; Teri Pollastro; Michelle Melisko; Tarah J Ballinger; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Antonio C Wolff Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Raymond C Tait; Kim Zoberi; McKenzie Ferguson; Kimberly Levenhagen; Rebecca A Luebbert; Kevin Rowland; Gretchen B Salsich; Christopher Herndon Journal: J Pain Date: 2018-06-30 Impact factor: 5.820