P van Muijen1, S F A Duijts2, D A Kornet-van der Aa3, A J van der Beek4, J R Anema4. 1. p.vanmuijen@vumc.nl. 2. Department of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, PO Box 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, PO Box 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, PO Box 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Research Center for Insurance Medicine, AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessing work disability in cancer survivors is a complex decision-making process. In the Netherlands, physicians employed by the Dutch Social Security Agency (SSA) play a key role in assessing work disability of cancer survivors on long-term sick leave. AIMS: To investigate the aspects physicians consider in assessing work disability in cancer survivors, their experiences related to the use of guidelines and their needs related to the use of a prediction rule that aims to support work disability assessments. METHODS: A qualitative study involving three consecutive focus group interviews, using a predetermined topic list. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and independently analysed using standard procedures of thematic analysis. RESULTS: The 29 participating physicians reported feeling responsible primarily for making correct assessments of cancer survivors' work disability, in which they predominantly investigate medical factors. Secondarily, non-medical factors related to the person, their work and/or their social environment were considered. Adherence to guidelines aiming to support physicians making such assessments was variable. CONCLUSIONS: In assessing work disability among cancer survivors on long-term sick leave, physicians considered medical and non-medical factors. The relevance of non-medical factors became more prominent in cases where medical issues were less obvious. There seems to be a need to enhance adherence to guidelines in order to support the work disability assessment of cancer survivors. The development of an implementation strategy for a prediction rule to support the work disability assessment of cancer survivors should be considered.
BACKGROUND: Assessing work disability in cancer survivors is a complex decision-making process. In the Netherlands, physicians employed by the Dutch Social Security Agency (SSA) play a key role in assessing work disability of cancer survivors on long-term sick leave. AIMS: To investigate the aspects physicians consider in assessing work disability in cancer survivors, their experiences related to the use of guidelines and their needs related to the use of a prediction rule that aims to support work disability assessments. METHODS: A qualitative study involving three consecutive focus group interviews, using a predetermined topic list. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and independently analysed using standard procedures of thematic analysis. RESULTS: The 29 participating physicians reported feeling responsible primarily for making correct assessments of cancer survivors' work disability, in which they predominantly investigate medical factors. Secondarily, non-medical factors related to the person, their work and/or their social environment were considered. Adherence to guidelines aiming to support physicians making such assessments was variable. CONCLUSIONS: In assessing work disability among cancer survivors on long-term sick leave, physicians considered medical and non-medical factors. The relevance of non-medical factors became more prominent in cases where medical issues were less obvious. There seems to be a need to enhance adherence to guidelines in order to support the work disability assessment of cancer survivors. The development of an implementation strategy for a prediction rule to support the work disability assessment of cancer survivors should be considered.
Authors: Jack B Fu; Melissa P Osborn; Julie K Silver; Benedict S Konzen; An Ngo-Huang; Rajesh Yadav; Eduardo Bruera Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Sylvia P Snoeck-Krygsman; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Birgit H P M Donker-Cools; Carel T J Hulshof; Lyanne P Jansen; René J Kox; Jan L Hoving Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Rimke Bijker; Saskia F A Duijts; Sherzel N Smith; Renée de Wildt-Liesveld; Johannes R Anema; Barbara J Regeer Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2018-09
Authors: René J Kox; Jan L Hoving; Jos H Verbeek; Maria J E Schouten; Carel T J Hulshof; Haije Wind; Monique H W Frings-Dresen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mariska de Wit; Haije Wind; Carel T J Hulshof; Angela G E M de Boer Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2019-05-18 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Christine Bennink; Marjolein van der Klift; Hans Scheurer; Pieter Sonneveld; Saskia F A Duijts Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 2.328