Literature DB >> 26156824

Adolescent and Adult Clients in Prenatal Case Management: Differences in Problems and Interventions Used.

L Michele Issel1, Kelsey Gilmet2, Izumi Chihara2, Jamie Slaughter-Acey3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize differences between pregnant adolescents and adults in the types of problems addressed by case managers, and to assess subsequent differences in the types of interventions used with both groups.
METHODS: Data stem from 3947 client encounters, provided by 223 case managers in 92 Medicaid-reimbursed prenatal case management programs; the clients were confirmed to be either adolescents (<20 years of age) or adults. Case managers provided information on each client encounter that occurred during 10 workdays over a 20 workday period using the Case Management Intervention Record , a data collection tool. The Chi square test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the types and number of problems, the types of intervention received, and the mean number of intervention minutes between adolescents and adults.
RESULTS: Adolescents experienced an average of 3.9 problems whereas adults experienced an average of 3.2 problems (p < 0.001). Compared to adults, adolescents were significantly more likely to experience problems in the areas of pregnancy health, family, education/job, transportation, and housing. With respect to breadth of interventions, adolescent clients were significantly more likely to receive support, clinical acts, and to be given tangible items compared to adult clients. On average, case managers spent significantly more time per encounter with adolescents than with adults overall (mean 56.6 vs. 50.3 min), and on educating, assessing, coaching, and monitoring.
CONCLUSION: Age related differences have both programmatic and provider implications. The intervention typology can be used to evaluate PCM programs serving high risk population.

Keywords:  Adolescent; Case management; Home visiting; Interventions; Prenatal; Problems

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156824     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-015-1789-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  32 in total

1.  Administrative characteristics of comprehensive prenatal case management programs.

Authors:  L Michele Issel; Ruth A Anderson; Debra J Kane
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.462

2.  Adolescent pregnancy: current trends and issues.

Authors:  Jonathan D Klein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Factors which influence use of prenatal care in low-income racial-ethnic women in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  R E Zambrana; C Dunkel-Schetter; S Scrimshaw
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1991-10

4.  Factors associated with adolescents' risk for late entry into prenatal care.

Authors:  C M Wiemann; A B Berenson; L G Pino; S L McCombs
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

5.  Measuring comprehensive case management interventions. Development of a tool.

Authors:  L M Issel
Journal:  Nurs Case Manag       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

6.  Women's perceptions of outcomes of prenatal case management.

Authors:  L M Issel
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  Measuring dosage: a key factor when assessing the relationship between prenatal case management and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Jaime C Slaughter; L Michele Issel; Arden S Handler; Deborah Rosenberg; Debra J Kane; Leslie T Stayner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-10

8.  Impact of a social support program on teenage prenatal care use and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  M M Rogers; M D Peoples-Sheps; C Suchindran
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Variations in pregnancy outcomes by race among 10-14-year-old mothers in the United States.

Authors:  N L Leland; D J Petersen; M Braddock; G R Alexander
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Dosage effect of prenatal home visiting on pregnancy outcomes in at-risk, first-time mothers.

Authors:  Neera K Goyal; Eric S Hall; Jareen K Meinzen-Derr; Robert S Kahn; Jodie A Short; Judith B Van Ginkel; Robert T Ammerman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  1 in total

1.  Birth-Related Outcomes for Second Children Following Home Visiting Program Enrollment for New Parents of First Children.

Authors:  Margaret L Holland; Eileen M Condon; Gabrielle R Rinne; Madelyn M Good; Sarah Bleicher; Connie Li; Rose M Taylor; Lois S Sadler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-01-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.