Literature DB >> 23010864

Measuring dosage: a key factor when assessing the relationship between prenatal case management and birth outcomes.

Jaime C Slaughter1, L Michele Issel, Arden S Handler, Deborah Rosenberg, Debra J Kane, Leslie T Stayner.   

Abstract

To assess whether a measure of prenatal case management (PCM) dosage is more sensitive than a dichotomous PCM exposure measure when evaluating the effect of PCM on low birthweight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB). We constructed a retrospective cohort study (N = 16,657) of Iowa Medicaid-insured women who had a singleton live birth from October 2005 to December 2006; 28 % of women received PCM. A PCM dosage measure was created to capture duration of enrollment, total time with a case manager, and intervention breadth. Propensity score (PS)-adjusted odds ratios (ORs), and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were calculated to assess the risk of each outcome by PCM dosage and the dichotomous PCM exposure measure. PS-adjusted ORs of PTB were 0.88 (95 % CI 0.70-1.11), 0.58 (95 % CI 0.47-0.72), and 1.43 (95 % CI 1.23-1.67) for high, medium, and low PCM dosage, respectively. For LBW, the PS-adjusted ORs were 0.76 (95 % CI 0.57-1.00), 0.64 (95 % CI 0.50-0.82), and 1.36 (95 % CI 1.14-1.63), for high, medium, and low PCM dosage, respectively. The PCM dichotomous participation measure was not significantly associated with LBW (OR = 0.95, 95 % CI 0.82-1.09) or PTB (0.97, 95 % CI 0.87-1.10). The reference group in each analysis is No PCM. PCM was associated with a reduced risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes for Medicaid-insured women in Iowa. PCM dosage appeared to be a more sensitive measure than the dichotomous measure of PCM participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23010864      PMCID: PMC6333464          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1143-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  31 in total

1.  How well do we understand the relationship between prenatal care and birth weight?

Authors:  K D Frick; P M Lantz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Evaluating the impact of case management dosage.

Authors:  Diane L Huber; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; Thomas Vaughn; James A Hall
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 3.  Nurse home visits to maternal-child clients: a review of intervention research.

Authors:  Diane B McNaughton
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.462

4.  Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Measuring comprehensive case management interventions. Development of a tool.

Authors:  L M Issel
Journal:  Nurs Case Manag       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

8.  The Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index: its US distribution and association with low birthweight.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Preventing low birth weight in Illinois: outcomes of the family case management program.

Authors:  Rodrigo Silva; Mike Thomas; Raul Caetano; Corinne Aragaki
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-11

Review 10.  Support during pregnancy for women at increased risk of low birthweight babies.

Authors:  E D Hodnett; S Fredericks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  7 in total

1.  A Community-Based Home Visitation Program's Impact on Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Yuqing Guo; Pamela Pimentel; Jared Lessard; Julie Rousseau; Jung-Ah Lee; Yvette Bojorquez; Michele Silva; Ellen Olshansky
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.412

2.  A Statewide Medicaid Enhanced Prenatal and Postnatal Care Program and Infant Injuries.

Authors:  Cristian I Meghea; Zhiying You; Lee Anne Roman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-10

3.  Adolescent and Adult Clients in Prenatal Case Management: Differences in Problems and Interventions Used.

Authors:  L Michele Issel; Kelsey Gilmet; Izumi Chihara; Jamie Slaughter-Acey
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

4.  Estimating the effect of Prenatal Care Coordination in Wisconsin: A sibling fixed effects analysis.

Authors:  David C Mallinson; Andrea Larson; Lawrence M Berger; Eric Grodsky; Deborah B Ehrenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The impact of the Medicaid high-risk ob care management program in New York State.

Authors:  Young Joo Park; Stephen Weinberg; Lindsay W Cogan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  A Longitudinal Study of Changes in Prenatal Care Utilization Between First and Second Births and Low Birth Weight.

Authors:  Christine T Loftus; Orion T Stewart; Mark D Hensley; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Stephen E Hawes
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

7.  Development and implementation of a screen-and-refer approach to addressing maternal depression, substance use, and intimate partner violence in home visiting clients.

Authors:  Sarah Dauber; Tiffany John; Aaron Hogue; Jessica Nugent; Gina Hernandez
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2017-07-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.