| Literature DB >> 26156566 |
Abstract
In this study, we collected life table data for the sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius, grown on Ipomoea batatas and Ipomoea triloba, and analyzed them using an age-stage, two-sex life table. We also demonstrated the growth potential of C. formicarius on these two host plants by using population projection. These data will be useful to the growers to the selection or eradication of host plants in an integrated control strategy for C. formicarius for the entire area of the targeted areas. We found that C. formicarius developed faster on I. batatas than on I. triloba. The developmental times of the larval and pupal stages on I. batatas than on I. triloba were 37.01 and 8.3 days. The adult females emerged before and began to produce eggs at 42 days earlier when reared on I. batatas. The fecundity of females was 90.0 eggs on I. batatas significantly higher than the mean fecundity of 68.5 eggs on I. triloba. Although this insect has a higher intrinsic rate of increase on I. batatas, the study indicated that C. formicarius can successfully survive and reproduce on both host plants.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26156566 PMCID: PMC4496664 DOI: 10.1038/srep11871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Means and standard errors of developmental time (d), adult longevity (d), and fecundity (eggs), adult preoviposition period (APOP) (d), total preoviposition period (TPOP) (d) of Cylas formicarius (F.) reared on Ipomoea batatas and Ipomoea triloba.
| Host plant | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage | |||||
| Egg | 149 | 4.86 ± 0.25 | 150 | 5.93 ± 0.15 | 0.0000 |
| Larva | 146 | 37.08 ± 0.22 | 150 | 54.87 ± 0.54 | 0.0000 |
| Pupa | 146 | 8.32 ± 0.15 | 150 | 16.99 ± 0.29 | 0.0000 |
| Female adult | 90 | 87.87 ± 1.11 | 83 | 57.41 ± 0.95 | 0.0000 |
| Male adult | 56 | 88.77 ± 1.32 | 67 | 56.25 ± 1.47 | 0.0000 |
| APOP (day) | 90 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 83 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.5243 |
| TPOP (day) | 90 | 50.16 ± 0.39 | 83 | 77.16 ± 0.88 | 0.0000 |
| Oviposition days | 90 | 29.72 ± 0.19 | 83 | 22.80 ± 0.17 | 0.0000 |
| Fecundity (eggs) | 90 | 90.91 ± 0.98 | 83 | 68.57 ± 1.24 | 0.0000 |
The difference between two treatments were evaluated by using paired bootstrap test.
Figure 1Survival rate to different developmental stages of Cylas formicarius on sweet potato Ipomoea batatas (A) and morning glory Ipomoea triloba (B).
Figure 2Age-specific survival rate (l) versus age of Cylas formicarius on sweet potato Ipomoea batatas (A) and morning glory Ipomoea triloba (B).
Means and standard errors of the intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate (λ), net reproductive rate (R0), and mean generation time (T) of Cylas formicarius (F.) reared on Ipomoea batatas and Ipomoea triloba estimated by using bootstrap technique with 40,000 resamplings.
| Host plant | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | |||
| 0.0642 ± 0.0012 | 0.0418 ± 0.0010 | 0.0000 | |
| 1.0663 ± 0.0013 | 1.0426 ± 0.0010 | 0.0000 | |
| 54.55 ± 3.70 | 37.94 ± 2.89 | 0.0004 | |
| 62.26 ± 0.44 | 87.07 ± 0.92 | 0.0000 | |
The data of two treatments were compared by using paired bootstrap test.
Figure 3Life expectancy of Cylas formicarius on sweet potato Ipomoea batatas (A) and morning glory Ipomoea triloba (B).
Figure 4Reproductive value of Cylas formicarius on sweet potato Ipomoea batatas (A) and morning glory Ipomoea triloba (B).
Figure 5Population projection of Cylas formicarius on sweet potato Ipomoea batatas (A) and morning glory Ipomoea triloba (B). Population projection started with 150 eggs of C. formicarius.