Jose López-Torrecilla1, Anna Boladeras2, María Angeles Cabeza3, Almudena Zapatero4, Josep Jove5, Luis M Esteban6, Ivan Henriquez7, Manuel Casaña8, Carmen González-San Segundo9, Antonio Gómez-Caamaño10, Jose Luis Mengual8, Asunción Hervás11, Julia Luisa Muñoz12, Gerardo Sanz13. 1. Servicio Oncología Radioterápica- ERESA, Hospital General Universitario, Avda. Tres Cruces s/n, 46014, Valencia, Spain. jltorrecilla@eresa.com. 2. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Hospitalet, Spain. 3. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. 4. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain. 5. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Badalona, Spain. 6. Escuela Universitaria Politécnica de La Almunia, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. 7. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain. 8. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain. 9. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain. 10. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. 11. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. 12. S.Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain. 13. Departamento de Métodos Estadísticos, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nomograms were established to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radiotherapy (RT) with a low weight of the characteristic variables of RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Our aim is to provide a new stratified tool for predicting BCR at 4 and 7 years in patients treated using RT with radical intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, nonrandomized analysis was performed on 5044 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with median age 70 years, who received RT-with or without ADT-between November 1992 and May 2007. Median follow-up was 5.5 years. BCR was defined as a rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 2 ng/ml over the post-treatment PSA nadir. Univariate association between predictor variables and BCR was assessed by the log-rank test, and three linked nomograms were created for multivariate prognosis of BCR-free survival. Each nomogram corresponds to a category of the Gleason score-either 6,7, or 8-10-and all of them were created from a single proportional hazards regression model stratified also by months of ADT (0, 1-6, 7-12, 13-24, 25-36, 36-60). The performance of this model was analyzed by calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility. RESULTS: Initial PSA, clinical stage, and RT dose were significant variables (p < 0.01). The model showed a good calibration. The concordance probability was 0.779, improving those obtained with other nomograms (0.587, 0.571, 0.554) in the database. Survival curves showed best clinical utility in a comparison with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups. CONCLUSION: For each Gleason score category, the nomogram provides information on the benefit of adding ADT to a specific RT dose.
BACKGROUND: Nomograms were established to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radiotherapy (RT) with a low weight of the characteristic variables of RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Our aim is to provide a new stratified tool for predicting BCR at 4 and 7 years in patients treated using RT with radical intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, nonrandomized analysis was performed on 5044 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with median age 70 years, who received RT-with or without ADT-between November 1992 and May 2007. Median follow-up was 5.5 years. BCR was defined as a rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 2 ng/ml over the post-treatment PSA nadir. Univariate association between predictor variables and BCR was assessed by the log-rank test, and three linked nomograms were created for multivariate prognosis of BCR-free survival. Each nomogram corresponds to a category of the Gleason score-either 6,7, or 8-10-and all of them were created from a single proportional hazards regression model stratified also by months of ADT (0, 1-6, 7-12, 13-24, 25-36, 36-60). The performance of this model was analyzed by calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility. RESULTS: Initial PSA, clinical stage, and RT dose were significant variables (p < 0.01). The model showed a good calibration. The concordance probability was 0.779, improving those obtained with other nomograms (0.587, 0.571, 0.554) in the database. Survival curves showed best clinical utility in a comparison with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups. CONCLUSION: For each Gleason score category, the nomogram provides information on the benefit of adding ADT to a specific RT dose.
Authors: James Mohler; Robert R Bahnson; Barry Boston; J Erik Busby; Anthony D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Daniel George; Eric Mark Horwitz; Robert P Huben; Philip Kantoff; Mark Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Paul H Lange; Gary Macvicar; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Bruce J Roth; Dennis C Shrieve; Matthew R Smith; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Patrick C Walsh Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Ewout W Steyerberg; Michael J Pencina; Hester F Lingsma; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Ben Van Calster Journal: Eur J Clin Invest Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 4.686
Authors: Ángel Borque; Jose Rubio-Briones; Luis M Esteban; Gerardo Sanz; Jose Domínguez-Escrig; Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus; Ana Calatrava; Eduardo Solsona Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Radka Stoyanova; Niraj H Pahlajani; Brian L Egleston; Mark K Buyyounouski; David Y T Chen; Eric M Horwitz; Alan Pollack Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael J Zelefsky; Michael W Kattan; Paul Fearn; Bertha L Fearon; Jason P Stasi; Alison M Shippy; Peter T Scardino Journal: Urology Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: H J Green; K I Pakenham; B C Headley; J Yaxley; D L Nicol; P N Mactaggart; C E Swanson; R B Watson; R A Gardiner Journal: BJU Int Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Deborah Kuban; Alan Pollack; Eugene Huang; Larry Levy; Lei Dong; George Starkschall; Isaac Rosen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038