Literature DB >> 26156249

Three linked nomograms for predicting biochemical failure in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy.

Jose López-Torrecilla1, Anna Boladeras2, María Angeles Cabeza3, Almudena Zapatero4, Josep Jove5, Luis M Esteban6, Ivan Henriquez7, Manuel Casaña8, Carmen González-San Segundo9, Antonio Gómez-Caamaño10, Jose Luis Mengual8, Asunción Hervás11, Julia Luisa Muñoz12, Gerardo Sanz13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nomograms were established to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radiotherapy (RT) with a low weight of the characteristic variables of RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Our aim is to provide a new stratified tool for predicting BCR at 4 and 7 years in patients treated using RT with radical intent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, nonrandomized analysis was performed on 5044 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with median age 70 years, who received RT-with or without ADT-between November 1992 and May 2007. Median follow-up was 5.5 years. BCR was defined as a rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 2 ng/ml over the post-treatment PSA nadir. Univariate association between predictor variables and BCR was assessed by the log-rank test, and three linked nomograms were created for multivariate prognosis of BCR-free survival. Each nomogram corresponds to a category of the Gleason score-either 6,7, or 8-10-and all of them were created from a single proportional hazards regression model stratified also by months of ADT (0, 1-6, 7-12, 13-24, 25-36, 36-60). The performance of this model was analyzed by calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility.
RESULTS: Initial PSA, clinical stage, and RT dose were significant variables (p < 0.01). The model showed a good calibration. The concordance probability was 0.779, improving those obtained with other nomograms (0.587, 0.571, 0.554) in the database. Survival curves showed best clinical utility in a comparison with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups.
CONCLUSION: For each Gleason score category, the nomogram provides information on the benefit of adding ADT to a specific RT dose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant therapy; Gleason score; Prostate-specific antigen; Radiation dose; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156249     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0866-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  23 in total

1.  Combining radiation therapy and androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer-a critical review.

Authors:  A Dal Pra; F L Cury; L Souhami
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer.

Authors:  James Mohler; Robert R Bahnson; Barry Boston; J Erik Busby; Anthony D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Daniel George; Eric Mark Horwitz; Robert P Huben; Philip Kantoff; Mark Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Paul H Lange; Gary Macvicar; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Bruce J Roth; Dennis C Shrieve; Matthew R Smith; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Assessing the incremental value of diagnostic and prognostic markers: a review and illustration.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Michael J Pencina; Hester F Lingsma; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Ben Van Calster
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.686

5.  Implementing the use of nomograms by choosing threshold points in predictive models: 2012 updated Partin Tables vs a European predictive nomogram for organ-confined disease in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ángel Borque; Jose Rubio-Briones; Luis M Esteban; Gerardo Sanz; Jose Domínguez-Escrig; Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus; Ana Calatrava; Eduardo Solsona
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  The impact of dose-escalated radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation for prostate cancer using 2 linked nomograms.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Niraj H Pahlajani; Brian L Egleston; Mark K Buyyounouski; David Y T Chen; Eric M Horwitz; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Pretreatment nomogram predicting ten-year biochemical outcome of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Michael W Kattan; Paul Fearn; Bertha L Fearon; Jason P Stasi; Alison M Shippy; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Quality of life compared during pharmacological treatments and clinical monitoring for non-localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H J Green; K I Pakenham; B C Headley; J Yaxley; D L Nicol; P N Mactaggart; C E Swanson; R B Watson; R A Gardiner
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Hazards of dose escalation in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Deborah Kuban; Alan Pollack; Eugene Huang; Larry Levy; Lei Dong; George Starkschall; Isaac Rosen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: are high-risk patients good candidates?

Authors:  Ken Yoshida; Hideya Yamazaki; Tadashi Takenaka; Tadayuki Kotsuma; Mineo Yoshida; Koji Masui; Yasuo Yoshioka; Yoshifumi Narumi; Toshitsugu Oka; Eiichi Tanaka
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.