BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) as the only form of radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2003 and June 2008, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 48 high-risk patients who had undergone HDR-ISBT at the National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital. Risk group classification was according to the criteria described in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Median follow-up was 73 months (range 12-109 months). Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered to all 48 patients; 12 patients also received adjuvant ADT. Maximal androgen blockade was performed in 37 patients. Median total treatment duration was 8 months (range 3-45 months). The planned prescribed dose was 54 Gy in 9 fractions over 5 days for the first 13 patients and 49 Gy in 7 fractions over 4 days for 34 patients. Only one patient who was over 80 years old received 38 Gy in 4 fractions over 3 days. The clinical target volume (CTV) was calculated for the prostate gland and the medial side of the seminal vesicles. A 10-mm cranial margin was added to the CTV to create the planning target volume (PTV). RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival and biochemical control rates were 98 and 87 %, respectively. Grade 3 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications occurred in 2 patients (4 %) and 1 patient (2 %), respectively; grade 2 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications occurred in 5 patients (10 %) and 1 patient (2 %), respectively. CONCLUSION: Even for high-risk patients, HDR-ISBT as the only form of radiotherapy combined with ADT achieved promising biochemical control results, with acceptable late genitourinary and gastrointestinal complication rates.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) as the only form of radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancerpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2003 and June 2008, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 48 high-risk patients who had undergone HDR-ISBT at the National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital. Risk group classification was according to the criteria described in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Median follow-up was 73 months (range 12-109 months). Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered to all 48 patients; 12 patients also received adjuvant ADT. Maximal androgen blockade was performed in 37 patients. Median total treatment duration was 8 months (range 3-45 months). The planned prescribed dose was 54 Gy in 9 fractions over 5 days for the first 13 patients and 49 Gy in 7 fractions over 4 days for 34 patients. Only one patient who was over 80 years old received 38 Gy in 4 fractions over 3 days. The clinical target volume (CTV) was calculated for the prostate gland and the medial side of the seminal vesicles. A 10-mm cranial margin was added to the CTV to create the planning target volume (PTV). RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival and biochemical control rates were 98 and 87 %, respectively. Grade 3 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications occurred in 2 patients (4 %) and 1 patient (2 %), respectively; grade 2 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications occurred in 5 patients (10 %) and 1 patient (2 %), respectively. CONCLUSION: Even for high-risk patients, HDR-ISBT as the only form of radiotherapy combined with ADT achieved promising biochemical control results, with acceptable late genitourinary and gastrointestinal complication rates.
Authors: Y Yoshioka; T Nose; K Yoshida; T Inoue; H Yamazaki; E Tanaka; H Shiomi; A Imai; S Nakamura; S Shimamoto; T Inoue Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mack Roach; Michelle DeSilvio; Richard Valicenti; David Grignon; Sucha O Asbell; Colleen Lawton; Charles R Thomas; William U Shipley Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: György Kovács; Richard Pötter; Tillmann Loch; Josef Hammer; Inger-Karine Kolkman-Deurloo; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Hagen Bertermann Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: D Jeffrey Demanes; Alvaro A Martinez; Michel Ghilezan; Dennis R Hill; Lionel Schour; David Brandt; Gary Gustafson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C Leland Rogers; Stephen C Alder; R LeGrand Rogers; Scott A Hopkins; McKay L Platt; Lane C Childs; Ronald H Crouch; Roger S Hansen; John K Hayes Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Rojymon Jacob; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Benjamin Movsas; Robert G Uzzo; Alan Pollack Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Inga S Grills; Alvaro A Martinez; Mitchell Hollander; Raywin Huang; Kenneth Goldman; Peter Y Chen; Gary S Gustafson Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jose López-Torrecilla; Anna Boladeras; María Angeles Cabeza; Almudena Zapatero; Josep Jove; Luis M Esteban; Ivan Henriquez; Manuel Casaña; Carmen González-San Segundo; Antonio Gómez-Caamaño; Jose Luis Mengual; Asunción Hervás; Julia Luisa Muñoz; Gerardo Sanz Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Daniel S Engeler; Christoph Schwab; Armin F Thöni; Werner Hochreiter; Ladislav Prikler; Stefan Suter; Patrick Stucki; Johann Schiefer; Ludwig Plasswilm; Hans-Peter Schmid; Paul Martin Putora Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Jonas Schiffmann; Hans Lesmana; Pierre Tennstedt; Burkhard Beyer; Katharina Boehm; Volker Platz; Derya Tilki; Georg Salomon; Cordula Petersen; Andreas Krüll; Markus Graefen; Rudolf Schwarz Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Nam P Nguyen; Rick Davis; Satya R Bose; Suresh Dutta; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Alexander Chi; Juan Godinez; Anand Desai; William Woods; Gabor Altdorfer; Mark D'Andrea; Ulf Karlsson; Richard A Vo; Thomas Sroka Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 6.244