Literature DB >> 26156015

Comparison of 2-Dimensional, 3-Dimensional, and Surgical Measurements of the Tricuspid Annulus Size: Clinical Implications.

Julien Dreyfus1, Guillaume Durand-Viel1, Richard Raffoul1, Soleiman Alkhoder1, Ulrik Hvass1, Costin Radu1, Nawwar Al-Attar1, Walid Ghodbhane1, David Attias1, Patrick Nataf1, Alec Vahanian1, David Messika-Zeitoun2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Associated tricuspid annuloplasty is recommended during left-heart valve surgery when the tricuspid annulus (TA) is dilated but methodology for the measurement of TA size and thresholds for TA enlargement are not clearly defined. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Measurement of the TA diameter (TAD) was prospectively performed using 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE) in 282 patients in 4 different views (parasternal long axis, parasternal short axis, apical 4-chamber [A4C], and subcostal). TAD was also measured using 3D-transesophageal echocardiography in 183 patients (long axis), peroperatively in 120 patients who underwent a tricuspid valve surgery and using TTE (A4C) in 66 healthy volunteers. TAD was significantly different between the 4 2D-TTE views (3.85±0.58, 3.87±0.61, 4.02±0.69, and 3.92±0.65 cm, respectively; P<0.0001) but differences were small and the A4C was the most feasible (76%, 65%, 92%, and 73%, respectively; P<0.0001) and offered the highest reproducibility. TAD measured in A4C view was smaller than when measured by 3D-transesophageal echocardiography (3.90±0.63 versus 4.33±0.62 cm; P<0.0001) but correlation was excellent (r=0.84; P<0.0001) with a systematic 4-mm underestimation. In contrast, 2D-TTE measurements were significantly smaller and only modestly correlated to surgical measurements (4.11±0.61 versus 4.37±0.75 cm; P<0.0001; r=0.57; P<0.0001) which were poorly reproducible. In healthy volunteers, we suggested 42 mm or 23 mm/m(2) as pathological values for the TAD in A4C.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of the TAD using 2D-TTE in A4C were highly feasible and reproducible and despite being systematically smaller than 3D measurements, accurately reflected the degree of TA enlargement as assessed using 3D transesophageal echocardiography. We proposed the thresholds that may be used in future prospective studies to demonstrate whether a preventive strategy would improve the outcome.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echocardiography, three-dimensional; mitral valve; tricuspid annulus; tricuspid valve; valve surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156015     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.003241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  15 in total

1.  Geometric comparison of the mitral and tricuspid valve annulus: Insights from three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Amgad N Makaryus; Haisam Ismail; John N Makaryus; Dali Fan
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-26

2.  Functional tricuspid regurgitation: indications, techniques, and outcomes.

Authors:  Tessa M F Watt; Alexander A Brescia; Aaron M Williams; Steven F Bolling
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-09

3.  Current transcatheter devices to treat functional tricuspid regurgitation with discussion of issues relevant to clinical trial design.

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05

4.  A Comparison of Transesophageal to Transthoracic Echocardiographic Measures of Right Ventricular Function.

Authors:  Shayne Michael Roberts; John Klick; Adrian Fischl; Tonya S King; Theodore J Cios
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 5.  Tricuspid valve disease: diagnosis, prognosis and management of a rapidly evolving field.

Authors:  Lluis Asmarats; Maurizio Taramasso; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Transthoracic versus intra-operative transesophageal echocardiography in right heart assessment.

Authors:  Saberio Lo Presti; Daniela Urina; Tarec K Elajami; Ivan A Arenas; Steve Xydas; Francesco Nappi; Ana V Soto; Esteban Escolar; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Influence of Atrial Fibrillation on Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With HeartMate 3.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hayashi; Yoshifumi Naka; Joseph Sanchez; Hiroo Takayama; Paul Kurlansky; Yuming Ning; Veli K Topkara; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Paolo C Colombo; Gabriel T Sayer; Nir Uriel; Koji Takeda
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Prevalence, Predictors, and Prognostic Value of Residual Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Koki Nakanishi; Shunichi Homma; Jiho Han; Hiroo Takayama; Paolo C Colombo; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Arthur R Garan; Maryjane A Farr; Paul Kurlansky; Marco R Di Tullio; Yoshifumi Naka; Koji Takeda
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Longitudinal echocardiographic and clinical follow-up of patients undergoing mitral valve surgery without concomitant tricuspid valve repair.

Authors:  R Jansen; B R van Klarenbosch; M J Cramer; R C A Meijer; P H M Westendorp; H W J Meijburg; J J J Bucx; S A J Chamuleau; J Kluin
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 10.  Future Perspectives in Percutaneous Treatment of Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Authors:  Antonio Mangieri; Matteo Pagnesi; Damiano Regazzoli; Alessandra Laricchia; Edwin Ho; Ythan Goldberg; Mei Chau; Francesco Gallo; Andrea Fisicaro; Arif Khokhar; Antonio Colombo; Francesco Giannini; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.