Tomomi Egawa-Takata1, Yutaka Ueda2, Akiko Morimoto1, Yusuke Tanaka1, Shinya Matsuzaki1, Eiji Kobayashi1, Kiyoshi Yoshino1, Masayuki Sekine3, Takayuki Enomoto3, Tadashi Kimura1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. ZVF03563@nifty.ne.jp. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most adolescents in Japan have recently been refraining from receiving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, following media reports of adverse medical events surrounding the vaccination and suspension of the Japanese governmental recommendation. We have previously reported that HPV vaccination of young girls is heavily influenced by guidance from their physicians concerning the vaccine and by the knowledge and attitude of the girls' mothers towards cervical cancer. However, it has been unclear as to how the obstetricians and gynecologists were themselves affected by the negative media reports. METHODS: A questionnaire, including questions about their working status, attitudes toward HPV vaccination and about cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccination status of their daughters, was posted to obstetricians and gynecologists. RESULTS: None of the daughters of the responding obstetrician and gynecologists received the HPV vaccination after the announced suspension of the governmental recommendation for the vaccine. The number who received the HPV vaccine in the 6th to 9th grade in 2014 was significantly lower than those in 2012 (p = 0.012). However, 64.7 % of the responders whose daughters were eligible and in the 6th to 12th grade still intended to vaccinate their daughters in the future. Of the responders, 65 % also intended to recommend vaccination to their teenage patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that obstetricians and gynecologists, like the general population, were negatively influenced by media reports of the adverse effect of the HPV vaccine and the suspension of the governmental recommendation. However, their intention to vaccinate their daughters was much higher than that of the general population. Restart of the governmental recommendation for HPV vaccines and better education about the HPV vaccine, including its adverse effects, and about cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening, are strongly recommended, for both the general public and for doctors, for improved prevention of cervical cancer.
BACKGROUND: Most adolescents in Japan have recently been refraining from receiving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, following media reports of adverse medical events surrounding the vaccination and suspension of the Japanese governmental recommendation. We have previously reported that HPV vaccination of young girls is heavily influenced by guidance from their physicians concerning the vaccine and by the knowledge and attitude of the girls' mothers towards cervical cancer. However, it has been unclear as to how the obstetricians and gynecologists were themselves affected by the negative media reports. METHODS: A questionnaire, including questions about their working status, attitudes toward HPV vaccination and about cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccination status of their daughters, was posted to obstetricians and gynecologists. RESULTS: None of the daughters of the responding obstetrician and gynecologists received the HPV vaccination after the announced suspension of the governmental recommendation for the vaccine. The number who received the HPV vaccine in the 6th to 9th grade in 2014 was significantly lower than those in 2012 (p = 0.012). However, 64.7 % of the responders whose daughters were eligible and in the 6th to 12th grade still intended to vaccinate their daughters in the future. Of the responders, 65 % also intended to recommend vaccination to their teenage patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that obstetricians and gynecologists, like the general population, were negatively influenced by media reports of the adverse effect of the HPV vaccine and the suspension of the governmental recommendation. However, their intention to vaccinate their daughters was much higher than that of the general population. Restart of the governmental recommendation for HPV vaccines and better education about the HPV vaccine, including its adverse effects, and about cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening, are strongly recommended, for both the general public and for doctors, for improved prevention of cervical cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gynecologist; Human papillomavirus; Japan; Obstetrician; Questionnaire; Vaccine
Authors: Matti Lehtinen; Jorma Paavonen; Cosette M Wheeler; Unnop Jaisamrarn; Suzanne M Garland; Xavier Castellsagué; S Rachel Skinner; Dan Apter; Paulo Naud; Jorge Salmerón; Song-Nan Chow; Henry Kitchener; Júlio C Teixeira; James Hedrick; Genara Limson; Anne Szarewski; Barbara Romanowski; Fred Y Aoki; Tino F Schwarz; Willy A J Poppe; Newton S De Carvalho; Maria Julieta V Germar; Klaus Peters; Adrian Mindel; Philippe De Sutter; F Xavier Bosch; Marie-Pierre David; Dominique Descamps; Frank Struyf; Gary Dubin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Paul M Darden; David M Thompson; James R Roberts; Jessica J Hale; Charlene Pope; Monique Naifeh; Robert M Jacobson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Suzanne M Garland; Mauricio Hernandez-Avila; Cosette M Wheeler; Gonzalo Perez; Diane M Harper; Sepp Leodolter; Grace W K Tang; Daron G Ferris; Marc Steben; Janine Bryan; Frank J Taddeo; Radha Railkar; Mark T Esser; Heather L Sings; Micki Nelson; John Boslego; Carlos Sattler; Eliav Barr; Laura A Koutsky Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Barbara A Slade; Laura Leidel; Claudia Vellozzi; Emily Jane Woo; Wei Hua; Andrea Sutherland; Hector S Izurieta; Robert Ball; Nancy Miller; M Miles Braun; Lauri E Markowitz; John Iskander Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Paavonen; P Naud; J Salmerón; C M Wheeler; S-N Chow; D Apter; H Kitchener; X Castellsague; J C Teixeira; S R Skinner; J Hedrick; U Jaisamrarn; G Limson; S Garland; A Szarewski; B Romanowski; F Y Aoki; T F Schwarz; W A J Poppe; F X Bosch; D Jenkins; K Hardt; T Zahaf; D Descamps; F Struyf; M Lehtinen; G Dubin Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-07-06 Impact factor: 79.321