Literature DB >> 26154249

An Equivalence Trial Comparing Instructor-Regulated With Directed Self-Regulated Mastery Learning of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Skills.

Luke A Devine1, Jeroen Donkers, Ryan Brydges, Vsevolod Perelman, Rodrigo B Cavalcanti, S Barry Issenberg.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Instructor-led simulation-based mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) skills is an effective and focused approach to competency-based education. Directed self-regulated learning (DSRL) may be an effective and less resource-intensive way to teach ACLS skills.
METHODS: Forty first-year internal medicine residents were randomized to either simulation-based DSRL or simulation-based instructor-regulated learning (IRL) of ACLS skills using a mastery learning model. Residents in each intervention completed pretest, posttest, and retention test of their performance in leading an ACLS response to a simulated scenario. Performance tests were assessed using a standardized checklist. Residents in the DSRL intervention were provided assessment instruments, a debriefing guide, and scenario-specific teaching points, and they were permitted to access relevant online resources. Residents in the IRL intervention had access to the same materials; however, the teaching and debriefing were instructor led.
RESULTS: Skills of both the IRL and DSRL interventions showed significant improvement after the intervention, with an average improvement on the posttest of 21.7%. After controlling for pretest score, there was no difference between intervention arms on the posttest [F(1,37) = 0.02, P = 0.94] and retention tests [F(1,17) = 1.43, P = 0.25]. Cost savings were realized in the DSRL intervention after the fourth group (16 residents) had completed each intervention, with an ongoing savings of $80 per resident.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a simulation-based mastery learning model, we observed equivalence in learning of ACLS skills for the DSRL and IRL conditions, whereas DSRL was more cost effective.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26154249     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  5 in total

1.  The Equivalence of Video Self-review Versus Debriefing After Simulation: Can Faculty Resources Be Reallocated?

Authors:  Gregory J Tudor; Gregory S Podolej; Ann Willemsen-Dunlap; Vivian Lau; Jessica D Svendsen; Jeremy McGarvey; John A Vozenilek; Lisa T Barker
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-08-12

2.  Self-assessment of team performance using T-NOTECHS in simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation is not consistent with expert assessment.

Authors:  Minna M Wieck; Cory McLaughlin; Todd P Chang; Alyssa Rake; Caron Park; Christianne Lane; Rita V Burke; L Caulette Young; Elizabeth A Cleek; Inge Morton; Catherine J Goodhue; Randall S Burd; Henri R Ford; Jeffrey S Upperman; Aaron R Jensen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.125

Review 3.  Monitoring and regulation of learning in medical education: the need for predictive cues.

Authors:  Anique B H de Bruin; John Dunlosky; Rodrigo B Cavalcanti
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Remote training in laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing home-based self-regulated training to centralized instructor-regulated training.

Authors:  Sigurd Beier Sloth; Rune Dall Jensen; Mikkel Seyer-Hansen; Mette Krogh Christensen; Gunter De Win
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Deliberate practice and mastery learning in resuscitation education: A scoping review.

Authors:  Aaron Donoghue; Kenneth Navarro; Emily Diederich; Marc Auerbach; Adam Cheng
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-05-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.