Stephen W Patrick1,2,3,4, William O Cooper1,3,4. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Mildred Stahlman Division of Neonatology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Vanderbilt Center for Health Services Research, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When and how to publish birth defects research can be complex, especially in the context of drugs used in pregnancy. Such research frequently involves multiple stakeholders, including regulatory agencies. Researchers must balance the potential peril of an unnecessarily panicked populace versus the benefit of protecting the public's health. METHODS: We use a case presentation and contemporary literature to highlight the potential tradeoffs that researchers must consider. We highlight important considerations including the public health impact, examining the likelihood of causality, understanding common considerations when using large data sources, the role of peer review and working in partnership with regulatory agencies. RESULTS: We suggest that plans for analyses, dissemination and risk communication are done best a priori and not post hoc. CONCLUSION: Rigorous research evaluating the impact of drugs used in pregnancy, coupled with effective dissemination strategies, has the potential improve outcomes for mothers and their infants for generations.
BACKGROUND: When and how to publish birth defects research can be complex, especially in the context of drugs used in pregnancy. Such research frequently involves multiple stakeholders, including regulatory agencies. Researchers must balance the potential peril of an unnecessarily panicked populace versus the benefit of protecting the public's health. METHODS: We use a case presentation and contemporary literature to highlight the potential tradeoffs that researchers must consider. We highlight important considerations including the public health impact, examining the likelihood of causality, understanding common considerations when using large data sources, the role of peer review and working in partnership with regulatory agencies. RESULTS: We suggest that plans for analyses, dissemination and risk communication are done best a priori and not post hoc. CONCLUSION: Rigorous research evaluating the impact of drugs used in pregnancy, coupled with effective dissemination strategies, has the potential improve outcomes for mothers and their infants for generations.
Authors: Allen A Mitchell; Suzanne M Gilboa; Martha M Werler; Katherine E Kelley; Carol Louik; Sonia Hernández-Díaz Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Krista F Huybrechts; Kristin Palmsten; Helen Mogun; Mary Kowal; Jerry Avorn; Soko Setoguchi-Iwata; Sonia Hernández-Díaz Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Susan E Andrade; Marsha A Raebel; Jeffrey Brown; Kimberly Lane; James Livingston; Denise Boudreau; Sharon J Rolnick; Douglas Roblin; David H Smith; Mary E Willy; Judy A Staffa; Richard Platt Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Miguel A Diego; Tiffany Field; Maria Hernandez-Reif; Saul Schanberg; Cynthia Kuhn; Victor Hugo Gonzalez-Quintero Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 2.079