Literature DB >> 26152886

Impact of the radius of the injector system on the cell viability in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: an ex vivo experimental study.

Efdal Yoeruek1, Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt1, Johanna Hofmann1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of the radius of the injector system on the viability of the endothelial cells in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
METHODS: Descemet membranes (DMs) of 30 corneoscleral rims were used in a paired design and divided into three groups (A, B, C). The right corneas were used as control (without shooting through the injector after DM preparation) and the left cornea for simulation of the implantation step (shooting through a glass injector of different radii). The injector in Group A had a diameter of 0.5 mm, group B 0.9 mm and group C 1.4 mm. Prior to preparation, endothelial cell count was measured and endothelial cell quality assessed. Quantification of potential damage was achieved by staining with a viability bioassay (calcein acetoxymethyl and ethidium homodimer-1) and DAPI. Apoptosis was evaluated by TUNEL (terminal dUTP nick-end labelling) staining.
RESULTS: The average percentage of the endothelial cell death ratios was 4.9 ± 3.3% in group A (n = 5), 3.7 ± 3.7% in group B (n = 5) and 3.9 ± 3.6% in group C (n = 5) with no significant difference compared to the control. The average percentage of apoptotic endothelial cells was 0.05 ± 0.05%, 0.60 ± 0.53% and 0.15 ± 0.26% in groups A, B and C, respectively, with no significant difference compared to the control.
CONCLUSIONS: Prepared grafts for transplantation in DMEK procedures may be injected through a smaller sized injector system of up to 0.5 mm with no significant increase in cell loss. Clinical studies are necessary to draw a final conclusion.
© 2015 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell viability; descemet membrane; descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; injector radius

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26152886     DOI: 10.1111/aos.12787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of endothelial cell loss and complications following DMEK with the use of three different graft injectors.

Authors:  K Droutsas; A Lazaridis; G D Kymionis; K Chatzistefanou; M M Moschos; C Koutsandrea; W Sekundo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Safety analysis and results of a borosilicate glass cartridge for no-touch graft loading and injection in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Annekatrin Rickmann; Silke Wahl; Alisa Katsen-Globa; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Otopathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Enters and Survives Inside Macrophages.

Authors:  Rahul Mittal; Christopher V Lisi; Hansi Kumari; M'hamed Grati; Patricia Blackwelder; Denise Yan; Chaitanya Jain; Kalai Mathee; Paulo H Weckwerth; Xue Z Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Comparing the effect of three Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty injectors on endothelial damage of grafts.

Authors:  Elizabeth Shen; Adam Fox; Brian Johnson; Marjan Farid
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.