Literature DB >> 26152746

Estimating negative likelihood ratio confidence when test sensitivity is 100%: A bootstrapping approach.

Keith A Marill1, Yuchiao Chang2, Kim F Wong3, Ari B Friedman4.   

Abstract

Objectives Assessing high-sensitivity tests for mortal illness is crucial in emergency and critical care medicine. Estimating the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the likelihood ratio (LR) can be challenging when sample sensitivity is 100%. We aimed to develop, compare, and automate a bootstrapping method to estimate the negative LR CI when sample sensitivity is 100%. Methods The lowest population sensitivity that is most likely to yield sample sensitivity 100% is located using the binomial distribution. Random binomial samples generated using this population sensitivity are then used in the LR bootstrap. A free R program, "bootLR," automates the process. Extensive simulations were performed to determine how often the LR bootstrap and comparator method 95% CIs cover the true population negative LR value. Finally, the 95% CI was compared for theoretical sample sizes and sensitivities approaching and including 100% using: (1) a technique of individual extremes, (2) SAS software based on the technique of Gart and Nam, (3) the Score CI (as implemented in the StatXact, SAS, and R PropCI package), and (4) the bootstrapping technique. Results The bootstrapping approach demonstrates appropriate coverage of the nominal 95% CI over a spectrum of populations and sample sizes. Considering a study of sample size 200 with 100 patients with disease, and specificity 60%, the lowest population sensitivity with median sample sensitivity 100% is 99.31%. When all 100 patients with disease test positive, the negative LR 95% CIs are: individual extremes technique (0,0.073), StatXact (0,0.064), SAS Score method (0,0.057), R PropCI (0,0.062), and bootstrap (0,0.048). Similar trends were observed for other sample sizes. Conclusions When study samples demonstrate 100% sensitivity, available methods may yield inappropriately wide negative LR CIs. An alternative bootstrapping approach and accompanying free open-source R package were developed to yield realistic estimates easily. This methodology and implementation are applicable to other binomial proportions with homogeneous responses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo method; Sensitivity and specificity; biostatistics; bootstrapping; confidence intervals; data interpretation; statistical

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26152746     DOI: 10.1177/0962280215592907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  10 in total

1.  Epidemiology and diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in lung cancer patients: is there a role for age adjusted D-dimers cutoff?

Authors:  I Anagnostopoulos; S Lagou; M K Spanorriga; K Tavernaraki; G Poulakou; K N Syrigos; L Thanos
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Performance of Prehospital Use of Chest Pain Risk Stratification Tools: The RESCUE Study.

Authors:  Jason P Stopyra; Anna C Snavely; Nicklaus P Ashburn; James O'Neill; Brennan E Paradee; Brian Hehl; Jordan Vorrie; Matthew Wells; R Darrell Nelson; Nella W Hendley; Chadwick D Miller; Simon A Mahler
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Nucleic Acid Testing for Diagnosis of Perinatally Acquired Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Early Infancy.

Authors:  Charitha Gowda; Stephanie Smith; Linda Crim; Katherine Moyer; Pablo J Sánchez; Jonathan R Honegger
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 20.999

Review 4.  Criteria for Identifying Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Who Are at Low Risk of Endocarditis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  George S Heriot; Katie Cronin; Steven Y C Tong; Allen C Cheng; Danny Liew
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.835

5.  Dedicated Education Unit is a cost-effective clinical education model for undergraduate nursing programs.

Authors:  Wendel Mombaque Dos Santos; Rasika Jayasekara
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-06-22

6.  Development and Validation of a Simplified Probability Assessment Score Integrated With Age-Adjusted d-Dimer for Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndromes.

Authors:  Fulvio Morello; Paolo Bima; Emanuele Pivetta; Marco Santoro; Elisabetta Catini; Barbara Casanova; Bernd A Leidel; Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Thomas Nestelberger; Christian Mueller; Stefano Grifoni; Enrico Lupia; Peiman Nazerian
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Analysis of 11,430 recombinant protein production experiments reveals that protein yield is tunable by synonymous codon changes of translation initiation sites.

Authors:  Bikash K Bhandari; Chun Shen Lim; Daniela M Remus; Augustine Chen; Craig van Dolleweerd; Paul P Gardner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  An 8-gene machine learning model improves clinical prediction of severe dengue progression.

Authors:  Yiran E Liu; Sirle Saul; Shirit Einav; Purvesh Khatri; Aditya Manohar Rao; Makeda Lucretia Robinson; Olga Lucia Agudelo Rojas; Ana Maria Sanz; Michelle Verghese; Daniel Solis; Mamdouh Sibai; Chun Hong Huang; Malaya Kumar Sahoo; Rosa Margarita Gelvez; Nathalia Bueno; Maria Isabel Estupiñan Cardenas; Luis Angel Villar Centeno; Elsa Marina Rojas Garrido; Fernando Rosso; Michele Donato; Benjamin A Pinsky
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Validation of an Automated System for Identifying Complications of Serious Pediatric Emergencies.

Authors:  Kenneth A Michelson; Arianna H Dart; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Richard G Bachur
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2021-08

10.  Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Edouard Poncelet; Aurelie Jalaguier-Coudray; Adalgisa Guerra; Laure S Fournier; Sanja Stojanovic; Ingrid Millet; Nishat Bharwani; Valerie Juhan; Teresa M Cunha; Gabriele Masselli; Corinne Balleyguier; Caroline Malhaire; Nicolas F Perrot; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Marc Bazot; Patrice Taourel; Raphaël Porcher; Emile Darai; Caroline Reinhold; Andrea G Rockall
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.