Julie Labra1, Parvathi Menon2, Karen Byth3, Shea Morrison1, Steve Vucic2. 1. St Joseph's Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 2. Western Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 3. Westmead Hospital, Research and Education Network, Sydney, Australia NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of rate of disease progression (ΔFS) as a prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic laterals sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: A total of 203 patients with ALS were prospectively recruited over a 10-year period. At initial visit, the following variables were collected: demographic details, symptom duration, site of onset, phenotype, riluzole use and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores. The ΔFS score at initial visit was calculated by dividing the ALSFRS-R total score by symptom duration (months). The primary end point was survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to illustrate the distribution of survival from a specified point, while multiple Cox proportional hazards modelling with backward stepwise variable selection was used to identify the independent predictors of survival at initial visit. RESULTS: The ΔFS score at initial visit was a significant predictor of survival in ALS (p<0.001), and remained significant when adjusted for age and site of onset (p<0.001). 3 prognostic subgroups emerged, with a ΔFS score of <0.47 associated with a median survival of 2.4 years, which was significantly greater when compared with an initial ΔFS score of between 0.47 and 1.11 (1.6 years, p<0.05) and a score >1.11 (0.7 years, p<0.001). Importantly, multiple Cox proportional hazards modelling identified ΔFS as a highly significant independent predictor of survival in ALS (p<0.001) along with site of disease onset (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Rate of disease progression appears to be a simple and sensitive clinical prognostic biomarker in ALS that could be potentially utilised in clinical practice and future therapeutic trials. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of rate of disease progression (ΔFS) as a prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic laterals sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: A total of 203 patients with ALS were prospectively recruited over a 10-year period. At initial visit, the following variables were collected: demographic details, symptom duration, site of onset, phenotype, riluzole use and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores. The ΔFS score at initial visit was calculated by dividing the ALSFRS-R total score by symptom duration (months). The primary end point was survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to illustrate the distribution of survival from a specified point, while multiple Cox proportional hazards modelling with backward stepwise variable selection was used to identify the independent predictors of survival at initial visit. RESULTS: The ΔFS score at initial visit was a significant predictor of survival in ALS (p<0.001), and remained significant when adjusted for age and site of onset (p<0.001). 3 prognostic subgroups emerged, with a ΔFS score of <0.47 associated with a median survival of 2.4 years, which was significantly greater when compared with an initial ΔFS score of between 0.47 and 1.11 (1.6 years, p<0.05) and a score >1.11 (0.7 years, p<0.001). Importantly, multiple Cox proportional hazards modelling identified ΔFS as a highly significant independent predictor of survival in ALS (p<0.001) along with site of disease onset (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Rate of disease progression appears to be a simple and sensitive clinical prognostic biomarker in ALS that could be potentially utilised in clinical practice and future therapeutic trials. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Rebecca K Sheean; Fiona C McKay; Erika Cretney; Christopher R Bye; Nirma D Perera; Doris Tomas; Richard A Weston; Karlene J Scheller; Elvan Djouma; Parvathi Menon; Stephen D Schibeci; Najwa Marmash; Justin J Yerbury; Stephen L Nutt; David R Booth; Graeme J Stewart; Mathew C Kiernan; Steve Vucic; Bradley J Turner Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: James Howells; José Manuel Matamala; Susanna B Park; Nidhi Garg; Steve Vucic; Hugh Bostock; David Burke; Matthew C Kiernan Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Gabriel S Walt; Hannah M Burris; Christopher B Brady; Keith R Spencer; Victor E Alvarez; Bertrand R Huber; Latease Guilderson; Nazifa Abdul Rauf; Derek Collins; Tarnjit Singh; Rebecca Mathias; James G Averill; Sean E Walker; Ian Robey; Ann C McKee; Neil W Kowall; Thor D Stein Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Smriti Agarwal; Elizabeth Highton-Williamson; Jashelle Caga; José M Matamala; Thanuja Dharmadasa; James Howells; Margaret C Zoing; Kazumoto Shibuya; Nimeshan Geevasinga; Steve Vucic; John R Hodges; Rebekah M Ahmed; Matthew C Kiernan Journal: J Neurol Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Keith R Spencer; Zachariah W Foster; Nazifa Abdul Rauf; Latease Guilderson; Derek Collins; James G Averill; Sean E Walker; Ian Robey; Jonathan D Cherry; Victor E Alvarez; Bertrand R Huber; Ann C McKee; Neil W Kowall; Christopher B Brady; Thor D Stein Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 6.508