| Literature DB >> 26150985 |
T Vinayagamoorthy1, Danielle Maryanski1, Dilanthi Vinayagamoorthy1, Katie S L Hay1, Jacob Yo1, Mark Carter1, Joseph Wiegel1.
Abstract
The two principal determining steps in molecular diagnosis are the amplification and the identification steps. Accuracy of DNA amplification is primarily determined by the annealing sequence of the PCR primer to the analyte DNA. Accuracy for identification is determined either by the annealing region of a labelled probe for the real time PCR analysis, or the annealing of a sequencing primer for DNA sequencing analysis, that binds to the respective analyte (amplicon). Presently, housekeeping genes (Beta globin, GAPDH) are used in molecular diagnosis to verify that the PCR conditions are optimum, and are thus known as amplification controls [1-4]. Although these genes have been useful as amplification controls, they lack the true definition of an internal control because the primers and annealing conditions are not identical to the analyte being assayed. This may result in a false negative report [5]. The IC-Code platform technology described here provides a true internal control where the internal control and analyte share identical PCR primers annealing sequences for the amplification step and identical sequencing primer annealing sequence for the identification step. •The analyte and internal control have the same PCR and sequencing annealing sequences.•This method assures for little or no false negatives and false positives due to the method's design of using identical annealing conditions for the internal control and analyte, and by using DNA sequencing analysis for the identification step of the analyte, respectively.•This method also allows for a set lower limit of detection to be used by varying the amount of internal control used in the assay.Entities:
Keywords: Analyte; IC-Code; Multiplex PCR; Nucleic acid amplification test; Pb2a; Sanger sequencing; True negative control for PCR amplification and DNA sequencing coupled analysis
Year: 2015 PMID: 26150985 PMCID: PMC4487703 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2015.03.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MethodsX ISSN: 2215-0161
Fig. 1Schematic flowchart and expected data for the application of IC-Code™ for molecular diagnostic assays.
Fig. 2Sequencing analysis results for IC-Code™ (internal control) and Pb2a (analyte). (A) Electropherogram for IC-Code™ only – true negative. (B) Electropherogram for IC-Code™ and Pb2a mixed – true positive. (C) Post-analysis of true negative with T-peaks (red) removed, leaving only A (green), C (blue), and G (black) peaks for base calling. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Base calls for analyzed Pb2a. Upper row is complete primary sequence for Pb2a. Lower row is analyzed data with T-peaks masked.
| Pb2a sequence | T | G | C | A | G | A | A | C | T | A | A | A | A | T | G | A | A | A | C | A | A |
| Analyzed data | G | C | A | G | A | A | C | A | A | A | A | G | A | A | A | C | A | A |