Literature DB >> 26150675

Quality control review: implementing a scientifically based quality control system.

James O Westgard1, Sten A Westgard2.   

Abstract

This review focuses on statistical quality control in the context of a quality management system. It describes the use of a 'Sigma-metric' for validating the performance of a new examination procedure, developing a total quality control strategy, selecting a statistical quality control procedure and monitoring ongoing quality on the sigma scale. Acceptable method performance is a prerequisite to the design and implementation of statistical quality control procedures. Statistical quality control can only monitor performance, and when properly designed, alert analysts to the presence of additional errors that occur because of unstable performance. A new statistical quality control planning tool, called 'Westgard Sigma Rules,' provides a simple and quick way for selecting control rules and the number of control measurements needed to detect medically important errors. The concept of a quality control plan is described, along with alternative adaptations of a total quality control plan and a risk-based individualized quality control plan. Finally, the ongoing monitoring of analytic performance and test quality are discussed, including determination of measurement uncertainty from statistical quality control data collected under intermediate precision conditions and bias determined from proficiency testing/external quality assessment surveys. A new graphical tool, called the Sigma Quality Assessment Chart, is recommended for demonstrating the quality of current examination procedures on the sigma scale.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Keywords:  Quality control; Six Sigma; quality management

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26150675     DOI: 10.1177/0004563215597248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  19 in total

1.  Quality specifications of routine clinical chemistry methods based on sigma metrics in performance evaluation.

Authors:  Jun Xia; Su-Feng Chen; Fei Xu; Yong-Lie Zhou
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Evaluation of Sigma Metrics and Westgard Rule Selection and Implementation of Internal Quality Control in Clinical Chemistry Reference Laboratory, Ethiopian Public Health Institute.

Authors:  Zeleke Geto; Tigist Getahun; Tadesse Lejisa; Yosef Tolcha; Demirew Bikila; Chala Bashea; Mehari Meles; Wossene Habtu; Genet Ashebir; Bikila Negasa; Meron Sileshi; Yeabkal Daniel; Andargachew Gashu; Feyissa Challa
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2021-08-02

3.  Quantitative analysis of ATM phosphorylation in lymphocytes.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; R Kenneth Czambel; Yan Lin; Nathan A Yates; Xuemei Zeng; Jeffery Shogan; John C Schmitz
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-06-04

4.  Sigma Metric Evaluation of Drugs in a Clinical Laboratory: Importance of Choosing Appropriate Total Allowable Error and a Troubleshooting Roadmap.

Authors:  Lokesh Kumar Sharma; Rashmi Rasi Datta; Neera Sharma
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2021-05-21

5.  High efficiency cabin air filter in vehicles reduces drivers' roadway particulate matter exposures and associated lipid peroxidation.

Authors:  Nu Yu; Shi Shu; Yan Lin; Jianwen She; Ho Sai Simon Ip; Xinghua Qiu; Yifang Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sigma-Metrics of Electrolyte Tests From a Recently Launched New-Generation Proficiency Testing Program of the Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratory.

Authors:  Hee Jin Huh; Yun Mi Park; Seungok Lee; Chunhwa Ihm; Soyeon Seo; Sang Gon Lee; Joonseok Park; Hae Il Park
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 7.  Quality Assurance in Clinical Chemistry: A Touch of Statistics and A Lot of Common Sense.

Authors:  Elvar Theodorsson
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Sigma metrics for assessing the analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: a comparison of two approaches: Electronic supplementary material available online for this article.

Authors:  Xiuzhi Guo; Tianjiao Zhang; Xuehui Gao; Pengchang Li; Tingting You; Qiong Wu; Jie Wu; Fang Zhao; Liangyu Xia; Ermu Xu; Ling Qiu; Xinqi Cheng
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  Application of Sigma metrics in assessing the clinical performance of verified versus non-verified reagents for routine biochemical analytes.

Authors:  Shuang Cao; Xiaosong Qin
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

10.  Risk analysis and assessment based on Sigma metrics and intended use.

Authors:  Yong Xia; Hao Xue; Cunliang Yan; Bowen Li; ShuQiong Zhang; Mingyang Li; Ling Ji
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.