Literature DB >> 26150318

Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity.

Winston D Byblow1,2, Cathy M Stinear1,3, P Alan Barber1,3, Matthew A Petoe1,3,4, Suzanne J Ackerley1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For most patients, resolution of upper limb impairment during the first 6 months poststroke is 70% of the maximum possible. We sought to identify candidate mechanisms of this proportional recovery. We hypothesized that proportional resolution of upper limb impairment depends on ipsilesional corticomotor pathway function, is mirrored by proportional recovery of excitability in this pathway, and is unaffected by upper limb therapy dose.
METHODS: Upper limb impairment was measured in 93 patients at 2, 6, 12, and 26 weeks after first-ever ischemic stroke. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and motor threshold were recorded from extensor carpi radialis using transcranial magnetic stimulation, and fractional anisotropy (FA) in the posterior limbs of the internal capsules was determined with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
RESULTS: Initial impairment score, presence of MEPs and FA asymmetry were the only predictors of impairment resolution, indicating a key role for corticomotor tract function. By 12 weeks, upper limb impairment resolved by 70% in patients with MEPs regardless of their initial impairment, and ipsilesional rest motor threshold also resolved by 70%. Resolution of impairment was insensitive to upper limb therapy dose.
INTERPRETATION: These findings indicate that upper limb impairment resolves by 70% of the maximum possible, regardless of initial impairment, but only for patients with intact corticomotor function. Impairment resolution seems to reflect spontaneous neurobiological processes that involve the ipsilesional corticomotor pathway. A better understanding of these mechanisms could lead to interventions that increase resolution of impairment above 70%.
© 2015 American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26150318     DOI: 10.1002/ana.24472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  109 in total

Review 1.  The Specific Requirements of Neural Repair Trials for Stroke.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  β-Oscillations Reflect Recovery of the Paretic Upper Limb in Subacute Stroke.

Authors:  Chih-Wei Tang; Fu-Jung Hsiao; Po-Lei Lee; Yun-An Tsai; Ya-Fang Hsu; Wei-Ta Chen; Yung-Yang Lin; Charlotte J Stagg; I-Hui Lee
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Poststroke Impairment and Recovery Are Predicted by Task-Specific Regionalization of Injury.

Authors:  Matthew S Jeffers; Boris Touvykine; Allyson Ripley; Gillian Lahey; Anthony Carter; Numa Dancause; Dale Corbett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Differential Poststroke Motor Recovery in an Arm Versus Hand Muscle in the Absence of Motor Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Jing Xu; Meret Branscheidt; Martin Lindquist; Jasim Uddin; Levke Steiner; Benjamin Hertler; Nathan Kim; Jessica Berard; Michelle D Harran; Juan C Cortes; Tomoko Kitago; Andreas Luft; John W Krakauer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 5.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 6.  Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: where do we stand?

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic biomarker for motor recovery and rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Josep Puig; Gerard Blasco; Gottfried Schlaug; Cathy M Stinear; Pepus Daunis-I-Estadella; Carles Biarnes; Jaume Figueras; Joaquín Serena; Maria Hernández-Pérez; Angel Alberich-Bayarri; Mar Castellanos; David S Liebeskind; Andrew M Demchuk; Bijoy K Menon; Götz Thomalla; Kambiz Nael; Max Wintermark; Salvador Pedraza
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Accelerating Stroke Recovery: Body Structures and Functions, Activities, Participation, and Quality of Life Outcomes From a Large Rehabilitation Trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Lewthwaite; Carolee J Winstein; Christianne J Lane; Sarah Blanton; Burl R Wagenheim; Monica A Nelsen; Alexander W Dromerick; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 9.  Pediatric Stroke: Unique Implications of the Immature Brain on Injury and Recovery.

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Ryan J Felling
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.372

10.  Repair after brainstem ischemia involves neurogenesis and the rubrospinal system.

Authors:  Theodor Rüber; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 10.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.