Literature DB >> 26149687

A Conserved Deubiquitinating Enzyme Uses Intrinsically Disordered Regions to Scaffold Multiple Protein Interaction Sites.

Benjamin J Reed1, Melissa N Locke1, Richard G Gardner2.   

Abstract

In the canonical view of protein function, it is generally accepted that the three-dimensional structure of a protein determines its function. However, the past decade has seen a dramatic growth in the identification of proteins with extensive intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which are conformationally plastic and do not appear to adopt single three-dimensional structures. One current paradigm for IDR function is that disorder enables IDRs to adopt multiple conformations, expanding the ability of a protein to interact with a wide variety of disparate proteins. The capacity for many interactions is an important feature of proteins that occupy the hubs of protein networks, in particular protein-modifying enzymes that usually have a broad spectrum of substrates. One such protein modification is ubiquitination, where ubiquitin is attached to proteins through ubiquitin ligases (E3s) and removed through deubiquitinating enzymes. Numerous proteomic studies have found that thousands of proteins are dynamically regulated by cycles of ubiquitination and deubiquitination. Thus, how these enzymes target their wide array of substrates is of considerable importance for understanding the function of the cell's diverse ubiquitination networks. Here, we characterize a yeast deubiquitinating enzyme, Ubp10, that possesses IDRs flanking its catalytic protease domain. We show that Ubp10 possesses multiple, distinct binding modules within its IDRs that are necessary and sufficient for directing protein interactions important for Ubp10's known roles in gene silencing and ribosome biogenesis. The human homolog of Ubp10, USP36, also has IDRs flanking its catalytic domain, and these IDRs similarly contain binding modules important for protein interactions. This work highlights the significant protein interaction scaffolding abilities of IDRs in the regulation of dynamic protein ubiquitination.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dhr2; Rpa190; Sir4; USP36; Ubp10; Utp22; binding module; deubiquitinating enzyme; deubiquitylation (deubiquitination); histone H2B; intrinsic disorder; intrinsically disordered protein; linear motif; scaffold; ubiquitin; ubiquitin-dependent protease; ubiquitylation (ubiquitination)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26149687      PMCID: PMC4536463          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.650952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  48 in total

Review 1.  The ubiquitin proteolytic system: from a vague idea, through basic mechanisms, and onto human diseases and drug targeting.

Authors:  Aaron Ciechanover
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Disorder and sequence repeats in hub proteins and their implications for network evolution.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi; Jake Chen; A Keith Dunker; István Simon; Peter Tompa
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes.

Authors:  Francisca E Reyes-Turcu; Karen H Ventii; Keith D Wilkinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 23.643

4.  Nucleolar structure and function are regulated by the deubiquitylating enzyme USP36.

Authors:  Akinori Endo; Masaki Matsumoto; Toshifumi Inada; Akitsugu Yamamoto; Keiichi I Nakayama; Naomi Kitamura; Masayuki Komada
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Close encounters of the third kind: disordered domains and the interactions of proteins.

Authors:  Peter Tompa; Monika Fuxreiter; Christopher J Oldfield; Istvan Simon; A Keith Dunker; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  DOT4 links silencing and cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Kahana; D E Gottschling
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape.

Authors:  Mathew E Sowa; Eric J Bennett; Steven P Gygi; J Wade Harper
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server.

Authors:  Christian Cole; Jonathan D Barber; Geoffrey J Barton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Drosophila stem cells share a common requirement for the histone H2B ubiquitin protease scrawny.

Authors:  Michael Buszczak; Shelley Paterno; Allan C Spradling
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Differential display identifies overexpression of the USP36 gene, encoding a deubiquitinating enzyme, in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jianduan Li; Lisa M Olson; Zhengyan Zhang; Lina Li; Miri Bidder; Loan Nguyen; John Pfeifer; Janet S Rader
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  13 in total

1.  Loss of the deubiquitinase USP36 destabilizes the RNA helicase DHX33 and causes preimplantation lethality in mice.

Authors:  Julia M Fraile; Diana Campos-Iglesias; Francisco Rodríguez; Aurora Astudillo; Roser Vilarrasa-Blasi; Nuria Verdaguer-Dot; Miguel A Prado; Joao A Paulo; Steven P Gygi; José I Martín-Subero; José M P Freije; Carlos López-Otín
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  The interplay of histone H2B ubiquitination with budding and fission yeast heterochromatin.

Authors:  Alexis Zukowski; Aaron M Johnson
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  Recruitment and allosteric stimulation of a histone-deubiquitinating enzyme during heterochromatin assembly.

Authors:  Alexis Zukowski; Nouf Omar Al-Afaleq; Emily D Duncan; Tingting Yao; Aaron M Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  EDEM1's mannosidase-like domain binds ERAD client proteins in a redox-sensitive manner and possesses catalytic activity.

Authors:  Lydia Lamriben; Michela E Oster; Taku Tamura; Weihua Tian; Zhang Yang; Henrik Clausen; Daniel N Hebert
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The Sir4 H-BRCT domain interacts with phospho-proteins to sequester and repress yeast heterochromatin.

Authors:  Ishan Deshpande; Jeremy J Keusch; Kiran Challa; Vytautas Iesmantavicius; Susan M Gasser; Heinz Gut
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  The OTUD5-UBR5 complex regulates FACT-mediated transcription at damaged chromatin.

Authors:  Angelo de Vivo; Anthony Sanchez; Jose Yegres; Jeonghyeon Kim; Sylvia Emly; Younghoon Kee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The Anti-Inflammatory Protein TNIP1 Is Intrinsically Disordered with Structural Flexibility Contributed by Its AHD1-UBAN Domain.

Authors:  Rambon Shamilov; Olga Vinogradova; Brian J Aneskievich
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 8.  Therapeutic strategies for anchored kinases and phosphatases: exploiting short linear motifs and intrinsic disorder.

Authors:  Patrick J Nygren; John D Scott
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  A balance of deubiquitinating enzymes controls cell cycle entry.

Authors:  Claudine E Mapa; Heather E Arsenault; Michelle M Conti; Kristin E Poti; Jennifer A Benanti
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  FACT and Ubp10 collaborate to modulate H2B deubiquitination and nucleosome dynamics.

Authors:  Melesse Nune; Michael T Morgan; Zaily Connell; Laura McCullough; Muhammad Jbara; Hao Sun; Ashraf Brik; Tim Formosa; Cynthia Wolberger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 8.713

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.