Literature DB >> 26149618

Using Cartoons to Transfer Knowledge Concerning the Principles of Work Disability Prevention Among Stakeholders.

Marie-Elise Labrecque1, Marie-France Coutu2, Marie-José Durand1, Jean-Baptiste Fassier1,3, Patrick Loisel4.   

Abstract

Purpose This study assesses how well two cartoons transfer knowledge of principles of work disability prevention among stakeholders, according to their level of experience. We also document stakeholders' perceptions of the usefulness of the cartoons. Method We performed a descriptive study. Two groups of stakeholders were recruited: (1) experienced (working for more than 2 years in work disability), (2) non-experienced (in training). A self-administered questionnaire with open-ended questions documented stakeholders' understanding of each cartoon box and their perception of the possible usefulness of the cartoons. We transformed qualitative responses into quantitative responses for descriptive purposes. We performed independent t tests to compare the groups' level of understanding, and content analysis for the perception of usefulness. Results Overall, 149 stakeholders (50 experienced and 99 non-experienced) participated and identified 79.4 and 61.4 % of all principles presented in each of the two cartoons respectively. Experienced stakeholders identified more principles compared to non-experienced stakeholders (p = 0.007). Both cartoons were perceived to be useful for knowledge transfer. Conclusions Principles were generally well identified in the cartoons by all participants. Cartoons can be used as an effective tool among stakeholders to achieve a common understanding in order to coordinate their actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartoons; Knowledge translation; Sick leave; Stakeholders; Vocational rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26149618     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-015-9595-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  24 in total

1.  Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Development of an implementation strategy for physiotherapy guidelines on low back pain.

Authors:  Geertruida E Bekkering; Arno J Engers; Michael Wensing; Henricus J M Hendriks; Maurits W van Tulder; Rob A B Oostendorp; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2003

3.  Assessment of risk factors for development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (RSI).

Authors:  R Wells; A Moore; J Potvin; R Norman
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Graphic medicine: use of comics in medical education and patient care.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Kimberly R Myers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-03

5.  A clinical return-to-work rule for patients with back pain.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Renée Bourbonnais; Pierre Frémont; Michel Rossignol; Susan R Stock; Isabelle Larocque
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope--if we can just get all the players onside.

Authors:  J Frank; S Sinclair; S Hogg-Johnson; H Shannon; C Bombardier; D Beaton; D Cole
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-16       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Low back pain: predictors of absenteeism, residual symptoms, functional impairment, and medical costs in Oregon workers' compensation recipients.

Authors:  P G Butterfield; P S Spencer; N Redmond; A Feldstein; N Perrin
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure.

Authors:  R Michielutte; J Bahnson; M B Dignan; E M Schroeder
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Compensation for musculoskeletal disorders in Quebec: systemic discrimination against women workers?

Authors:  Katherine Lippel
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.663

Review 10.  Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; Radoslaw Wasiak; Richard T Roessler; Kathryn M McPherson; J R Anema; Mireille N M van Poppel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Returning to work: The cancer survivor's transformational journey of adjustment and coping.

Authors:  Antoni Barnard; Loraine Clur; Yvonne Joubert
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-11-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.