Robert C G Martin1,2, Charles R Scoggins1,2, Marshall Schreeder3, William S Rilling4, Christopher J Laing5, Clifton M Tatum6, Lawrence R Kelly6, Ricardo D Garcia-Monaco7, Vivek R Sharma2,8, Todd S Crocenzi9, Steven M Strasberg10. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky. 2. James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, Kentucky. 3. Clearview Cancer Institute, Huntsville, Alabama. 4. Froedtert Medical College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 5. Interventional Radiology, Sutter Health, Sacramento, California. 6. Norton Radiology Associates, Louisville, Kentucky. 7. Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 8. Division of Medical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky. 9. Providence Medical Center, Portland, Oregon. 10. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis/Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reports have demonstrated the superior activity of combining both irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) therapy. An option for gaining similar benefits with less toxicity would be the administration of irinotecan through a hepatic artery approach. The aim of this study was to assess the response and adverse event rates for irinotecan drug-eluting beads (DEBIRI) with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS:Patients with colorectal liver metastases were randomly assigned to modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) and bevacizumab or mFOLFOX6, bevacizumab, and DEBIRI (FOLFOX-DEBIRI). The primary endpoint was the response rate. The secondary endpoints were adverse events, the rate of conversion to resection, and progression-free survival. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 70 patients: 10 patients in the pilot and then 30 patients randomly assigned to the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm and 30 patients randomly assigned to the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm. The 2 groups were similar with respect to the extent of liver involvement (30% vs 30%), but a greater percentage of patients in the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or 2 (57% vs 31%) and extrahepatic disease (56% vs 32%, P = .02). The median numbers of chemotherapy cycles were similar (10 vs 9), and there were similar rates of grade 3/4 adverse events (54% for the FOLFOX-DEBIRI group vs 46% for the FOLFOX/bevacizumab group). The overall response rate was significantly greater in the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm versus the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm at 2 (78% vs 54%, P = .02), 4 (95% vs 70%, P = .03), and 6 months (76% vs 60%, P = .05). There was significantly more downsizing to resection in the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm versus the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm (35% vs 16%, P = .05), and there was improved median progression-free survival (15.3 vs 7.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous administration of mFOLFOX6 (with or without bevacizumab) and DEBIRI through the hepatic artery (FOLFOX-DEBIRI) is safe and does not cause treatment delays or increase the systemic toxicity of chemotherapy. This strategy leads to improved overall response rates, improved hepatic progression-free survival, and more durable overall progression-free survival in patients downsized to resection.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Reports have demonstrated the superior activity of combining both irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) therapy. An option for gaining similar benefits with less toxicity would be the administration of irinotecan through a hepatic artery approach. The aim of this study was to assess the response and adverse event rates for irinotecan drug-eluting beads (DEBIRI) with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS:Patients with colorectal liver metastases were randomly assigned to modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) and bevacizumab or mFOLFOX6, bevacizumab, and DEBIRI (FOLFOX-DEBIRI). The primary endpoint was the response rate. The secondary endpoints were adverse events, the rate of conversion to resection, and progression-free survival. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 70 patients: 10 patients in the pilot and then 30 patients randomly assigned to the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm and 30 patients randomly assigned to the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm. The 2 groups were similar with respect to the extent of liver involvement (30% vs 30%), but a greater percentage of patients in the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or 2 (57% vs 31%) and extrahepatic disease (56% vs 32%, P = .02). The median numbers of chemotherapy cycles were similar (10 vs 9), and there were similar rates of grade 3/4 adverse events (54% for the FOLFOX-DEBIRI group vs 46% for the FOLFOX/bevacizumab group). The overall response rate was significantly greater in the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm versus the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm at 2 (78% vs 54%, P = .02), 4 (95% vs 70%, P = .03), and 6 months (76% vs 60%, P = .05). There was significantly more downsizing to resection in the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm versus the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm (35% vs 16%, P = .05), and there was improved median progression-free survival (15.3 vs 7.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous administration of mFOLFOX6 (with or without bevacizumab) and DEBIRI through the hepatic artery (FOLFOX-DEBIRI) is safe and does not cause treatment delays or increase the systemic toxicity of chemotherapy. This strategy leads to improved overall response rates, improved hepatic progression-free survival, and more durable overall progression-free survival in patients downsized to resection.
Authors: R Vera; E González-Flores; C Rubio; J Urbano; M Valero Camps; J J Ciampi-Dopazo; J Orcajo Rincón; V Morillo Macías; M A Gomez Braco; G Suarez-Artacho Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Paul Revel-Mouroz; Philippe Otal; Marion Jaffro; Antoine Petermann; Olivier Meyrignac; Pierre Rabinel; Fatima-Zohra Mokrane Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2017-04-14
Authors: Tyler D Fields; Prejesh Philips; Charles R Scoggins; Cliff Tatum; Lawrence Kelly; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Kathleen De Greef; Christian Rolfo; Antonio Russo; Thiery Chapelle; Giuseppe Bronte; Francesco Passiglia; Andreia Coelho; Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Marc Peeters Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-08-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Anders Kindberg Boysen; Martin Jensen; Dennis Tønner Nielsen; Frank Viborg Mortensen; Brita Singers Sørensen; Anni Ravnsbæk Jensen; Karen-Lise Spindler Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Andrew C Gordon; Sarah B White; Yihe Yang; Vanessa L Gates; Daniel Procissi; Kathleen R Harris; Zhuoli Zhang; Tianchu Lyu; Xiaoke Huang; Matthew R Dreher; Reed A Omary; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski; Andrew C Larson Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 2.740