Neal Bhutiani1, Olaguoke Akinwande1, Robert C G Martin2. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Clinic, 315 E. Broadway - #311, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. 2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Clinic, 315 E. Broadway - #311, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. Robert.Martin@louisville.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Response rates to systemic chemotherapy for patients who have failed irinotecan-based chemotherapy for liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer range between 10 and 18 % with overall survival between 7 and 9 months. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial irinotecan therapy in patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed systemic irinotecan. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional, multi-national, analysis of patients who received DEBIRI in the setting of unresectable liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients had received between 1 and 4 lines of prior chemotherapy, the majority of which included systemic irinotecan. Primary endpoints were toxicity profile and tumor response rate. RESULTS: 296 patients with unresectable liver metastases who had undergone 666 DEBIRI treatments were reviewed. 192 treatments were performed in patients who had received prior systemic irinotecan. 222 treatments were performed in irinotecan-naïve patients. The median number of DEBIRI treatments was 1 (range 1-8); median treatment dose was 100 mg (range 50-200 mg), with total hepatic treatment of approximately 100 mg (range 20/30-200/300 mg). All-grade adverse events occurred in 18 % of patients receiving prior systemic irinotecan compared with 15 % of patients receiving no prior systemic irinotecan (including chemo-naïve patients). Response rates in patients with prior systemic irinotecan were 44 % at 3 months, 43 % at 6 months, and 44 % at 12 months, compared with 45, 40, and 35 % during the same time point in patients without prior systemic irinotecan. All-grade adverse events occurred in 10, 20, 10, and 37 % of patients receiving 0, 1, 2, and 3+ lines of systemic chemotherapy, respectively. Overall survival was 90 %, 93 %, 90 %, 90 % at 6 months and 76 %, 71 %, 77 %, 87 % at 12 months in patients undergoing DEBIRI therapy after receiving 0, 1, 2, and 3+ lines of systemic chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial drug-eluting irinotecan bead (DEBIRI) therapy are not affected by non-response to prior systemic irinotecan. While DEBIRI complete response rates are greatest and overall adverse events are least in chemotherapy-naïve individuals, it retains its respectable efficacy and low rate of serious adverse events even in the setting of previous administration of systemic chemotherapy.
INTRODUCTION: Response rates to systemic chemotherapy for patients who have failed irinotecan-based chemotherapy for liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer range between 10 and 18 % with overall survival between 7 and 9 months. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial irinotecan therapy in patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed systemic irinotecan. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional, multi-national, analysis of patients who received DEBIRI in the setting of unresectable liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients had received between 1 and 4 lines of prior chemotherapy, the majority of which included systemic irinotecan. Primary endpoints were toxicity profile and tumor response rate. RESULTS: 296 patients with unresectable liver metastases who had undergone 666 DEBIRI treatments were reviewed. 192 treatments were performed in patients who had received prior systemic irinotecan. 222 treatments were performed in irinotecan-naïve patients. The median number of DEBIRI treatments was 1 (range 1-8); median treatment dose was 100 mg (range 50-200 mg), with total hepatic treatment of approximately 100 mg (range 20/30-200/300 mg). All-grade adverse events occurred in 18 % of patients receiving prior systemic irinotecan compared with 15 % of patients receiving no prior systemic irinotecan (including chemo-naïve patients). Response rates in patients with prior systemic irinotecan were 44 % at 3 months, 43 % at 6 months, and 44 % at 12 months, compared with 45, 40, and 35 % during the same time point in patients without prior systemic irinotecan. All-grade adverse events occurred in 10, 20, 10, and 37 % of patients receiving 0, 1, 2, and 3+ lines of systemic chemotherapy, respectively. Overall survival was 90 %, 93 %, 90 %, 90 % at 6 months and 76 %, 71 %, 77 %, 87 % at 12 months in patients undergoing DEBIRI therapy after receiving 0, 1, 2, and 3+ lines of systemic chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial drug-eluting irinotecan bead (DEBIRI) therapy are not affected by non-response to prior systemic irinotecan. While DEBIRI complete response rates are greatest and overall adverse events are least in chemotherapy-naïve individuals, it retains its respectable efficacy and low rate of serious adverse events even in the setting of previous administration of systemic chemotherapy.
Authors: Marc Peeters; Timothy Jay Price; Andrés Cervantes; Alberto F Sobrero; Michel Ducreux; Yevhen Hotko; Thierry André; Emily Chan; Florian Lordick; Cornelis J A Punt; Andrew H Strickland; Gregory Wilson; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Laslo Roman; Eric Van Cutsem; Valentina Tzekova; Simon Collins; Kelly S Oliner; Alan Rong; Jennifer Gansert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Russell E Brown; Matthew R Bower; Tiffany L Metzger; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Michael J Hahl; Cliff Tatum; Robert C G Martin Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Dana Tomalty; Marshall Schreeder; Tiffany Metzger; Clifton Tatum; Vivek Sharma Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Helen X Chen; Margaret Mooney; Matthew Boron; Don Vena; Kimberly Mosby; Louise Grochow; Carl Jaffe; Lawrence Rubinstein; James Zwiebel; Richard S Kaplan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R C G Martin; J Howard; D Tomalty; K Robbins; R Padr; P M Bosnjakovic; Cliff Tatum Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: P Rougier; E Van Cutsem; E Bajetta; N Niederle; K Possinger; R Labianca; M Navarro; R Morant; H Bleiberg; J Wils; L Awad; P Herait; C Jacques Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-10-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: R P Jones; P Sutton; R M D Greensmith; A Santoyo-Castelazo; D F Carr; R Jenkins; C Rowe; J Hamlett; B K Park; M Terlizzo; E O'Grady; P Ghaneh; S W Fenwick; H Z Malik; G J Poston; N R Kitteringham Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Robert Cg Martin; Ken Robbins; Dana Tomalty; Ryan O'Hara; Petar Bosnjakovic; Radek Padr; Miloslav Rocek; Frantisek Slauf; Alexander Scupchenko; Cliff Tatum Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: R Vera; E González-Flores; C Rubio; J Urbano; M Valero Camps; J J Ciampi-Dopazo; J Orcajo Rincón; V Morillo Macías; M A Gomez Braco; G Suarez-Artacho Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Nicolas Voizard; Tiffany Ni; Alex Kiss; Robyn Pugash; Michael Jonathon Raphael; Natalie Coburn; Elizabeth David Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 3.677