| Literature DB >> 26149278 |
Daniel J Wilkinson1, Jessica Cegielski2, Bethan E Phillips2, Catherine Boereboom2, Jonathan N Lund2, Philip J Atherton2, Kenneth Smith2.
Abstract
Stable isotope tracer methodologies are becoming increasingly widespread in metabolic research; yet a number of factors restrict their implementation, such as, i.v infusions, multiple cannulae, tissue samples, and significant cost. We recently validated the sensitivity of the orally administered stable isotope tracer deuterium oxide (D2O) for quantifying day-to-day changes in muscle protein synthesis (MPS). This method is less invasive, restrictive, and more cost-effective than traditional amino acid (AA) tracer techniques. In the present study, we hypothesized the sensitivity of our analytical techniques (GC-Pyrolysis-IRMS) would permit D2O-derived measurements of MPS over much shorter periods (i.e., hours) usually only possible using AA-tracer techniques. We recruited nine males (24 ± 3 year, BMI: 25 ± 3 kg·m(-)²) into an internally controlled comparison of D2O versus (13)C AA-tracers. The day before the acute study subjects consumed 400 mL D2O, and on the study day, received a primed (0.3 mg·kg(-1)) continuous (0.6 mg·kg·h(-1)) i.v infusion of L-[ring-(13)C6]-phenylalanine to quantify MPS under both: (1) basal [postabsorptive] and; (2) stimulated [postprandial] that is, consumption of 20 g EAA, conditions. Measures of MPS yielded indistinguishable technique differences with respect to EAA, (13)C: 0.065 ± 0.004 to 0.089 ± 0.006%·h(-1) (P < 0.05) and D2O: 0.050 ± 0.007 to 0.088 ± 0.008%·h(-1) (P < 0.05) with qualitatively similar increases. Our findings reveal that acute measurement of MPS, usually only possible using AA-tracers, are feasible over shorter periods with orally administered D2O when used in tandem with GC-Pyrolysis-IRMS. We conclude that this D2O approach provides a less invasive, cost-effective, and flexible means by which to quantify MPS acutely over several hours.Entities:
Keywords: Deuterium oxide; metabolism; muscle protein synthesis; stable isotope tracers
Year: 2015 PMID: 26149278 PMCID: PMC4552519 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12433
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Composition of essential amino acid drink.
| Essential amino acid | Mass added (g) | Percentage mass added (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Histidine | 1.61 | 8.09 |
| Isoleucine | 2.31 | 11.60 |
| Leucine | 4.79 | 24.06 |
| Lysine | 4.09 | 20.54 |
| Methionine | 1.27 | 6.38 |
| Phenylalanine | 1.21 | 6.08 |
| Threonine | 1.51 | 7.58 |
| Tryptophan | 0.64 | 3.21 |
| Valine | 2.48 | 12.46 |
Figure 1Schematic of D2O L-[ring-13C6]-Phenylalanine dual tracer comparison study protocol.
Figure 2Plasma (A) Leucine (B) Isoleucine, and (C) Valine concentrations. *Significantly different from fasted P < 0.05.
Figure 3(A) Saliva body water enrichment in delta excess notation and (B) plasma phenylalanine enrichment in APE.
Figure 4(A) Comparison of mean postabsorptive (PA) and postprandial (PP) myofibrillar FSR as measured using D2O (black bars) and L-[ring-13C6]-phenylalanine (clear bars). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001. (B) Individual carbon FSR values, and (C) Individual D2O FSR values. (D) Absolute δ excess values for carbon and deuterium tracers.
Figure 5(A) Bland–Altman plot of comparison between the two tracer methods, (B) Correlation between FSR values produced using each tracer method, (C) Correlation between the change in FSR due to anabolic stimulus (EAA feed).