BACKGROUND: Although cerebral lesions 3 mm or larger on imaging are associated with incident stroke, lesions smaller than 3 mm are typically ignored. OBJECTIVE: To examine stroke risks associated with subclinical brain lesions (<3 mm only, ≥3 mm only, and both sizes) and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). DESIGN: Community cohort from the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study. SETTING: Two ARIC sites with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 1993 to 1995. PARTICIPANTS: 1884 adults aged 50 to 73 years with MRI, no prior stroke, and average follow-up of 14.5 years. MEASUREMENTS: Lesions on MRI (by size), WMH score (scale of 0 to 9), incident stroke, all-cause mortality, and stroke-related mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Compared with no lesions, stroke risk tripled with lesions smaller than 3 mm only (HR, 3.47 [95% CI, 1.86 to 6.49]), doubled with lesions 3 mm or larger only (HR, 1.94 [CI, 1.22 to 3.07]), was 8-fold higher with lesions of both sizes (HR, 8.59 [CI, 4.69 to 15.73]), and doubled with a WMH score of at least 3 (HR, 2.14 [CI, 1.45 to 3.16]). Risk for stroke-related death tripled with lesions smaller than 3 mm only (HR, 3.05 [CI, 1.04 to 8.94]) and was 7 times higher with lesions of both sizes (HR, 6.97 [CI, 2.03 to 23.93]). LIMITATION: Few strokes (especially hemorrhagic) and few participants with lesions smaller than 3 mm only or lesions of both sizes. CONCLUSION: Very small cerebrovascular lesions may be associated with increased risks for stroke and death; presence of lesions smaller than 3 mm and 3 mm or larger may result in a particularly striking risk increase. Larger studies are needed to confirm findings and provide more precise estimates. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
BACKGROUND: Although cerebral lesions 3 mm or larger on imaging are associated with incident stroke, lesions smaller than 3 mm are typically ignored. OBJECTIVE: To examine stroke risks associated with subclinical brain lesions (<3 mm only, ≥3 mm only, and both sizes) and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). DESIGN: Community cohort from the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study. SETTING: Two ARIC sites with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 1993 to 1995. PARTICIPANTS: 1884 adults aged 50 to 73 years with MRI, no prior stroke, and average follow-up of 14.5 years. MEASUREMENTS: Lesions on MRI (by size), WMH score (scale of 0 to 9), incident stroke, all-cause mortality, and stroke-related mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Compared with no lesions, stroke risk tripled with lesions smaller than 3 mm only (HR, 3.47 [95% CI, 1.86 to 6.49]), doubled with lesions 3 mm or larger only (HR, 1.94 [CI, 1.22 to 3.07]), was 8-fold higher with lesions of both sizes (HR, 8.59 [CI, 4.69 to 15.73]), and doubled with a WMH score of at least 3 (HR, 2.14 [CI, 1.45 to 3.16]). Risk for stroke-related death tripled with lesions smaller than 3 mm only (HR, 3.05 [CI, 1.04 to 8.94]) and was 7 times higher with lesions of both sizes (HR, 6.97 [CI, 2.03 to 23.93]). LIMITATION: Few strokes (especially hemorrhagic) and few participants with lesions smaller than 3 mm only or lesions of both sizes. CONCLUSION: Very small cerebrovascular lesions may be associated with increased risks for stroke and death; presence of lesions smaller than 3 mm and 3 mm or larger may result in a particularly striking risk increase. Larger studies are needed to confirm findings and provide more precise estimates. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Authors: Jian Hui Fu; Vincent Mok; Wynnie Lam; Adrian Wong; Winnie Chu; Yunyun Xiong; Ping Wing Ng; Tak Hon Tsoi; Vincent Yeung; Ka Sing Wong Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Tetsuya Ohira; Eyal Shahar; Lloyd E Chambless; Wayne D Rosamond; Thomas H Mosley; Aaron R Folsom Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Victor E A Gerdes; Vincent I H Kwa; Hugo ten Cate; Dees P M Brandjes; Harry R Büller; Jan Stam Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2005-08-11 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: W D Rosamond; A R Folsom; L E Chambless; C H Wang; P G McGovern; G Howard; L S Copper; E Shahar Journal: Stroke Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Karlijn F de Laat; Anil M Tuladhar; Anouk G W van Norden; David G Norris; Marcel P Zwiers; Frank-Erik de Leeuw Journal: Brain Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Keenan A Walker; B Gwen Windham; Melinda C Power; Ron C Hoogeveen; Aaron R Folsom; Christie M Ballantyne; David S Knopman; Elizabeth Selvin; Clifford R Jack; Rebecca F Gottesman Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Michelle L Meyer; Priya Palta; Hirofumi Tanaka; Jennifer A Deal; Jacqueline Wright; David S Knopman; Michael E Griswold; Thomas H Mosley; Gerardo Heiss Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Mandip S Dhamoon; Ying-Kuen Cheung; Ahmet Bagci; Noam Alperin; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind; Clinton B Wright Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mandip S Dhamoon; Ying-Kuen Cheung; Janet T DeRosa; Jose Gutierrez; Yeseon P Moon; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind; Clinton B Wright Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Silvia Koton; Andrea L C Schneider; B Gwen Windham; Thomas H Mosley; Rebecca F Gottesman; Josef Coresh Journal: Stroke Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 7.914