Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic1, Julie M Donohue, Joshua M Thorpe, Subashan Perera, Carolyn T Thorpe, Zachary A Marcum, Walid F Gellad. 1. *Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA †Department of Pharmacy, Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ Departments of ‡Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health §Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh ∥Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System Departments of ¶Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health #Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA **Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement efforts are frequently tied to patients achieving ≥80% medication adherence. However, there is little empirical evidence that this threshold optimally predicts important health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To apply machine learning to examine how adherence to oral hypoglycemic medications is associated with avoidance of hospitalizations, and to identify adherence thresholds for optimal discrimination of hospitalization risk. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 33,130 non-dual-eligible Medicaid enrollees with type 2 diabetes. We randomly selected 90% of the cohort (training sample) to develop the prediction algorithm and used the remaining (testing sample) for validation. We applied random survival forests to identify predictors for hospitalization and fit survival trees to empirically derive adherence thresholds that best discriminate hospitalization risk, using the proportion of days covered (PDC). OUTCOMES: Time to first all-cause and diabetes-related hospitalization. RESULTS: The training and testing samples had similar characteristics (mean age, 48 y; 67% female; mean PDC=0.65). We identified 8 important predictors of all-cause hospitalizations (rank in order): prior hospitalizations/emergency department visit, number of prescriptions, diabetes complications, insulin use, PDC, number of prescribers, Elixhauser index, and eligibility category. The adherence thresholds most discriminating for risk of all-cause hospitalization varied from 46% to 94% according to patient health and medication complexity. PDC was not predictive of hospitalizations in the healthiest or most complex patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence thresholds most discriminating of hospitalization risk were not uniformly 80%. Machine-learning approaches may be valuable to identify appropriate patient-specific adherence thresholds for measuring quality of care and targeting nonadherent patients for intervention.
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement efforts are frequently tied to patients achieving ≥80% medication adherence. However, there is little empirical evidence that this threshold optimally predicts important health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To apply machine learning to examine how adherence to oral hypoglycemic medications is associated with avoidance of hospitalizations, and to identify adherence thresholds for optimal discrimination of hospitalization risk. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 33,130 non-dual-eligible Medicaid enrollees with type 2 diabetes. We randomly selected 90% of the cohort (training sample) to develop the prediction algorithm and used the remaining (testing sample) for validation. We applied random survival forests to identify predictors for hospitalization and fit survival trees to empirically derive adherence thresholds that best discriminate hospitalization risk, using the proportion of days covered (PDC). OUTCOMES: Time to first all-cause and diabetes-related hospitalization. RESULTS: The training and testing samples had similar characteristics (mean age, 48 y; 67% female; mean PDC=0.65). We identified 8 important predictors of all-cause hospitalizations (rank in order): prior hospitalizations/emergency department visit, number of prescriptions, diabetes complications, insulin use, PDC, number of prescribers, Elixhauser index, and eligibility category. The adherence thresholds most discriminating for risk of all-cause hospitalization varied from 46% to 94% according to patient health and medication complexity. PDC was not predictive of hospitalizations in the healthiest or most complex patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence thresholds most discriminating of hospitalization risk were not uniformly 80%. Machine-learning approaches may be valuable to identify appropriate patient-specific adherence thresholds for measuring quality of care and targeting nonadherent patients for intervention.
Authors: Eileen Hsich; Eiran Z Gorodeski; Eugene H Blackstone; Hemant Ishwaran; Michael S Lauer Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2010-11-23
Authors: Joseph Menzin; Jonathan R Korn; Joseph Cohen; Francis Lobo; Bin Zhang; Mark Friedman; Peter J Neumann Journal: J Manag Care Pharm Date: 2010-05
Authors: Niteesh K Choudhry; Michael A Fischer; Jerry Avorn; Joshua N Liberman; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Juliana Pakes; Troyen A Brennan; William H Shrank Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-05-09
Authors: Guoan Chen; Sinae Kim; Jeremy M G Taylor; Zhuwen Wang; Oliver Lee; Nithya Ramnath; Rishindra M Reddy; Jules Lin; Andrew C Chang; Mark B Orringer; David G Beer Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: P Michael Ho; John S Rumsfeld; Frederick A Masoudi; David L McClure; Mary E Plomondon; John F Steiner; David J Magid Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-09-25
Authors: Julie C Lauffenburger; Jennifer Lewey; Saira Jan; Sagar Makanji; Christina A Ferro; Alexis A Krumme; Jessica Lee; Roya Ghazinouri; Nancy Haff; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-03-01
Authors: Zhe He; Shubo Tian; Ankita Singh; Shayok Chakraborty; Shenghao Zhang; Mia Liza A Lustria; Neil Charness; Nelson A Roque; Erin R Harrell; Walter R Boot Journal: Inf Process Manag Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 7.466