Literature DB >> 26147584

Better therapy requires better response evaluation: Paving the way for minimal residual disease testing for every myeloma patient.

Ola Landgren1, Roger G Owen2.   

Abstract

In 2015, there is a large body of evidence demonstrating that minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity after therapy is a powerful predictor of progression-free survival and overall survival in multiple myeloma. On the basis of available data, we believe MRD provides a meaningful endpoint for regulatory purposes, academic studies, and a valuable prognostic evaluation of individual patients in the clinical setting. Similar to what has been shown in acute and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, based on emerging data, the prognostic impact of MRD in multiple myeloma appears to be independent of induction therapy received. This fact raises fundamental questions regarding best possible treatment strategies (e.g., fixed number of cycles versus response adapted number of cycles) as well as optimal treatment modalities (e.g., newer effective but less intense combination therapies versus high dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation), in particular for patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma.
© 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRD; clinical trial; flow cytometry; myeloma; standardization; treatment response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26147584     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom        ISSN: 1552-4949            Impact factor:   3.058


  15 in total

1.  Carfilzomib significantly improves the progression-free survival of high-risk patients in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Rafael Fonseca; David Siegel; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Ivan Špička; Tamás Masszi; Roman Hájek; Laura Rosiñol; Vesselina Goranova-Marinova; Georgi Mihaylov; Vladimír Maisnar; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Michael Wang; Ruben Niesvizky; Albert Oriol; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Jiri Minarik; Antonio Palumbo; William Bensinger; Vishal Kukreti; Dina Ben-Yehuda; A Keith Stewart; Mihaela Obreja; Philippe Moreau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  New Developments in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Assessment of Response in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  A look backward and forward in the regulatory and treatment history of multiple myeloma: Approval of novel-novel agents, new drug development, and longer patient survival.

Authors:  Dickran Kazandjian; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  MRD-driven treatment paradigm for newly diagnosed transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  O Landgren; S Giralt
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Introduction to multiple myeloma special issue: The flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Frederic I Preffer; Constance M Yuan; Pei Lin; MaryAlice Stetler-Stevenson; Gerald E Marti
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.058

6.  Minimal Residual Disease Status as a Surrogate Endpoint for Progression-free Survival in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Studies: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Heinz Ludwig; Ola Landgren; Bruno Paiva; Chris Morris; Hui Yang; Kefei Zhou; Sunhee Ro; Maria-Victoria Mateos
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2019-10-09

Review 7.  Minimal residual disease analysis in myeloma - when, why and where.

Authors:  Uday Yanamandra; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-10-11

8.  Minimal residual disease assessment by multiparameter flow cytometry in transplant-eligible myeloma in the EMN02/HOVON 95 MM trial.

Authors:  Stefania Oliva; Davine Hofste Op Bruinink; Lucie Rihova; Mattia D'Agostino; Lucia Pantani; Andrea Capra; Bronno van der Holt; Rossella Troia; Maria Teresa Petrucci; Tania Villanova; Pavla Vsianska; Romana Jugooa; Claudia Brandt-Hagens; Milena Gilestro; Massimo Offidani; Rossella Ribolla; Monica Galli; Roman Hajek; Francesca Gay; Michele Cavo; Paola Omedé; Vincent H J van der Velden; Mario Boccadoro; Pieter Sonneveld
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 9.  The role of high-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplant in multiple myeloma: is it time for a paradigm shift?

Authors:  Dickran Kazandjian; Clifton C Mo; Ola Landgren; Paul G Richardson
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 8.615

10.  Circulating tumor cells as a biomarker for response to therapy in multiple myeloma patients treated within the GMMG-MM5 trial.

Authors:  S Huhn; N Weinhold; J Nickel; M Pritsch; T Hielscher; M Hummel; U Bertsch; B Huegle-Doerr; M Vogel; R Angermund; M Hänel; H J Salwender; K Weisel; J Dürig; M Görner; H Kirchner; N Peter; U Graeven; F Lordick; M Hoffmann; P Reimer; I W Blau; A Jauch; K Dembowsky; T Möhler; P Wuchter; H Goldschmidt
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.