Literature DB >> 26147493

Measuring disease levels in myeloma using flow cytometry in combination with other laboratory techniques: Lessons from the past 20 years at the Leeds Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service.

Andy C Rawstron1, Ruth M de Tute1, J Haughton1, Roger G Owen1.   

Abstract

People with myeloma who obtain a good response to treatment have a better survival if sensitive molecular or flow-cytometric techniques show no detectable minimal residual disease (MRD). The application of MRD techniques to clinical trials is now considered to be increasingly important because treatment approaches are sufficiently effective that using survival outcomes is slowing down the identification of the best new treatments. The articles in this issue consider the laboratory requirements for harmonization of MRD analysis by flow cytometry but there are practical considerations that are also important in implementing a myeloma MRD assay in the cytometry laboratory. In particular, it is important to consider when to request, and how best to utilize, a bone marrow aspirate sample because the procedure is invasive and the cells obtained are valuable for a number of different investigations. This brief article considers some experience obtained over two decades of implementing a service for MRD detection, initially as a scientific bolt-on to clinical trials through to a routine clinical diagnostic assay.
© 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flow cytometry; multiparameter analysis; rare event detection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26147493     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom        ISSN: 1552-4949            Impact factor:   3.058


  5 in total

1.  Introduction to multiple myeloma special issue: The flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Frederic I Preffer; Constance M Yuan; Pei Lin; MaryAlice Stetler-Stevenson; Gerald E Marti
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.058

2.  Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Superior Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil C Munshi; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Andy C Rawstron; Roger G Owen; J Anthony Child; Anjan Thakurta; Paul Sherrington; Mehmet Kemal Samur; Anna Georgieva; Kenneth C Anderson; Walter M Gregory
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Next Generation Flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Flores-Montero; L Sanoja-Flores; B Paiva; N Puig; O García-Sánchez; S Böttcher; V H J van der Velden; J-J Pérez-Morán; M-B Vidriales; R García-Sanz; C Jimenez; M González; J Martínez-López; A Corral-Mateos; G-E Grigore; R Fluxá; R Pontes; J Caetano; L Sedek; M-C Del Cañizo; J Bladé; J-J Lahuerta; C Aguilar; A Bárez; A García-Mateo; J Labrador; P Leoz; C Aguilera-Sanz; J San-Miguel; M-V Mateos; B Durie; J J M van Dongen; A Orfao
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Correlation of plasma cell assessment by phenotypic methods and molecular profiles by NGS in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias.

Authors:  Ekaterina Rebmann Chigrinova; Naomi A Porret; Thomas Pabst; Ulrike Bacher; Martin Andres; Gertrud Wiedemann; Yara Banz; Myriam Legros; Matthias Pollak; Elisabeth Oppliger Leibundgut
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 5.  Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: State of the Art and Applications in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alessandro Gozzetti; Donatella Raspadori; Francesca Bacchiarri; Anna Sicuranza; Paola Pacelli; Ilaria Ferrigno; Dania Tocci; Monica Bocchia
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-09-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.