Literature DB >> 26147226

Assessment of respiration-induced vertebral motion in prone-positioned patients during general anaesthesia.

Yajun Liu1, Cheng Zeng1, Mingxing Fan1, Lin Hu1, Chi Ma1, Wei Tian1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic techniques are beginning to be applied to spine surgery, but safety is always a concern. Respiration-induced motion during surgery could lead to inaccurate robot-assisted pedicle screw placement. Accurate positional information for vertebral movement is needed to develop new techniques to eliminate or adjust respiration-induced motion and improve the accuracy of robotic spine surgery.
METHODS: An optical tracking system was attached to patients' backs to track the motion of the C3, C7, T7, T12, L4 and S1 vertebral bodies. Monitoring was done in the operating room, with patients under general anaesthesia.
RESULTS: Measured motion (peak to peak) during breathing was greater in T7 (2.2593 mm), T12 (2.2665 mm) and L4 (1.6054 mm) than in other segments. Anterior-posterior motion was greater than either left-right or superior-inferior motion.
CONCLUSION: During general anaesthesia, significant motion occurs in vertebral bodies, caused by breathing, especially in the lower thoracic and lumbar segments.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  respiratory motion; robot-assisted surgery; spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26147226     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  5 in total

1.  3D ultrasound registration-based visual servoing for neurosurgical navigation.

Authors:  Oliver Zettinig; Benjamin Frisch; Salvatore Virga; Marco Esposito; Anna Rienmüller; Bernhard Meyer; Christoph Hennersperger; Yu-Mi Ryang; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Intraoperative Error Propagation in 3-Dimensional Spinal Navigation From Nonsegmental Registration: A Prospective Cadaveric and Clinical Study.

Authors:  Daipayan Guha; Raphael Jakubovic; Shaurya Gupta; Michael G Fehlings; Todd G Mainprize; Albert Yee; Victor X D Yang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-10-09

3.  Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Ming-Xing Fan; Xiao-Guang Han; Ya-Jun Liu; Da He; Bo Liu; Wei Tian
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement under Regional Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shangju Gao; Jingchao Wei; Wenyi Li; Long Zhang; Can Cao; Jinshuai Zhai; Bo Gao
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 5.  Guide wire displacement in robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw implantation.

Authors:  Wei Du; Dexin Zou; Jianfeng Zhang; Jianqing Liu; Wenqing Qu; Shudong Zhang
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.195

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.