Literature DB >> 26147184

A framework for inverse planning of beam-on times for 3D small animal radiotherapy using interactive multi-objective optimisation.

Marleen Balvert1, Stefan J van Hoof, Patrick V Granton, Daniela Trani, Dick den Hertog, Aswin L Hoffmann, Frank Verhaegen.   

Abstract

Advances in precision small animal radiotherapy hardware enable the delivery of increasingly complicated dose distributions on the millimeter scale. Manual creation and evaluation of treatment plans becomes difficult or even infeasible with an increasing number of degrees of freedom for dose delivery and available image data. The goal of this work is to develop an optimisation model that determines beam-on times for a given beam configuration, and to assess the feasibility and benefits of an automated treatment planning system for small animal radiotherapy. The developed model determines a Pareto optimal solution using operator-defined weights for a multiple-objective treatment planning problem. An interactive approach allows the planner to navigate towards, and to select the Pareto optimal treatment plan that yields the most preferred trade-off of the conflicting objectives. This model was evaluated using four small animal cases based on cone-beam computed tomography images. Resulting treatment plan quality was compared to the quality of manually optimised treatment plans using dose-volume histograms and metrics. Results show that the developed framework is well capable of optimising beam-on times for 3D dose distributions and offers several advantages over manual treatment plan optimisation. For all cases but the simple flank tumour case, a similar amount of time was needed for manual and automated beam-on time optimisation. In this time frame, manual optimisation generates a single treatment plan, while the inverse planning system yields a set of Pareto optimal solutions which provides quantitative insight on the sensitivity of conflicting objectives. Treatment planning automation decreases the dependence on operator experience and allows for the use of class solutions for similar treatment scenarios. This can shorten the time required for treatment planning and therefore increase animal throughput. In addition, this can improve treatment standardisation and comparability of research data within studies and among different institutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26147184     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/5681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Exploring the feasibility of a clinical proton beam with an adaptive aperture for pre-clinical research.

Authors:  Isabel P Almeida; Ana Vaniqui; Lotte Ejr Schyns; Brent van der Heyden; James Cooley; Townsend Zwart; Armin Langenegger; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dose painting by dynamic irradiation delivery on an image-guided small animal radiotherapy platform.

Authors:  Stefan J van Hoof; Joana B Verde; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Automatic multiatlas based organ at risk segmentation in mice.

Authors:  Brent van der Heyden; Mark Podesta; Daniëlle Bp Eekers; Ana Vaniqui; Isabel P Almeida; Lotte Ejr Schyns; Stefan J van Hoof; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A kernel-based dose calculation algorithm for kV photon beams with explicit handling of energy and material dependencies.

Authors:  Anna Merle Reinhart; Martin F Fast; Peter Ziegenhein; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Implications of respiratory motion for small animal image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mark A Hill; Borivoj Vojnovic
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Quantitative Bioluminescence Tomography-Guided Conformal Irradiation for Preclinical Radiation Research.

Authors:  Xiangkun Xu; Zijian Deng; Hamid Dehghani; Iulian Iordachita; Michael Lim; John W Wong; Ken Kang-Hsin Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Virtual monoenergetic micro-CT imaging in mice with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Brent van der Heyden; Stijn Roden; Rüveyda Dok; Sandra Nuyts; Edmond Sterpin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The impact of dual energy CT imaging on dose calculations for pre-clinical studies.

Authors:  Ana Vaniqui; Lotte E J R Schyns; Isabel P Almeida; Brent van der Heyden; Stefan J van Hoof; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.