Literature DB >> 26146441

Light Dosimetry at Tissue Surfaces for Small Circular Fields.

Timothy C Zhu1, Andreea Dimofte1, Stephen M Hahn1, Robert A Lustig1.   

Abstract

Small circular light fields (≤ 2 cm diameter) are sometimes used for photodynamic therapy of skin and recurrent breast cancers on the chest wall. These fields have lateral dimensions comparable to the effective mean free path of photons in the turbid medium, which causes reduced light fluence rate compared to that of a broad beam of uniform incident irradiance. We have compared Monte-Carlo simulation with in-vivo dosimetry for circular fields (R = 0.25, 0.35, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, and 8 cm) in a liquid phantom composed of intralipid and ink (µs' = 4 - 20 cm-1 and µa = 0.1 cm-1) for wavelengths between 532 and 730 nm. We used anisotropy g = 0.9 and the index of refraction n = 1.4 for all Monte-Carlo simulations. The measured light fluence rate agrees with Monte-Carlo simulation to within 10%, with the measured value lower than that of the Monte-Carlo simulation on tissue surface. The ratio of the peak fluence rates between a circular beam and a broad beam under tissue is 0.58 - 0.96 or 0.84 - 1.00 for R between 0.5 - 2 cm and µeff = 1.1 or 2.0 cm-1, respectively. The ratio of peak fluence rate and incident irradiance for the broad beam is 5.9 and 6.4 for µeff = 1.1 and 2.0 cm-1, respectively. The optical penetration depth δ varies from 0.34 - 0.48 cm for R between 0.5 and 2 cm, with the corresponding δ = 0.51 cm for a broad beam. The ratio of fluence rate and incident irradiance above tissue surface is 1.4 - 1.8 or 1.9 - 2.2 for R between 0.5 - 2 cm and µeff = 1.1 or 2.0 cm-1, respectively. At depth of 0.2 cm inside tissue, Off-axis ratio OAR, defined as the ratio of fluence rate at off-axis distance r to that on the central axis, varies between 0.91 - 0.54 or 0.93 - 0.52 for off-axis distances r between 0.6 and 1.0 cm and µeff = 1.1 or 2.1 cm-1, respectively. In conclusion, in-vivo light dosimetry agrees with Monte-Carlo simulation for small field dosimetry provided the isotropic detector is corrected for the blind spot. The light fluence rates for small circular fields are substantially lower than that of the broad beam of the same incident irradiance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo; Small circular fields; diffuse reflectance; diffusion theory; in-vivo light dosimetry; tissue optical properties

Year:  2003        PMID: 26146441      PMCID: PMC4486372          DOI: 10.1117/12.474144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  13 in total

1.  Properties of the light emerging from a diffusive medium: angular dependence and flux at the external boundary.

Authors:  F Martelli; A Sassaroli; G Zaccanti; Y Yamada
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Comparison between isotropic and nonisotropic dosimetry systems during intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  T G Vulcan; T C Zhu; C E Rodriguez; A Hsi; D L Fraker; P Baas; L H Murrer; W M Star; E Glatstein; A G Yodh; S M Hahn
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Performance of isotropic light dosimetry probes based on scattering bulbs in turbid media.

Authors:  J P A Marijnissen; W M Star
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A diffusion theory model of spatially resolved, steady-state diffuse reflectance for the noninvasive determination of tissue optical properties in vivo.

Authors:  T J Farrell; M S Patterson; B Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  The photobiology of photodynamic therapy: cellular targets and mechanisms.

Authors:  N L Oleinick; H H Evans
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Calibration of isotropic light dosimetry probes based on scattering bulbs in clear media.

Authors:  J P Marijnissen; W M Star
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Light dosimetry in vivo.

Authors:  W M Star
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A Monte Carlo model for the absorption and flux distributions of light in tissue.

Authors:  B C Wilson; G Adam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Lutetium texaphyrin (PCI-0123): a near-infrared, water-soluble photosensitizer.

Authors:  S W Young; K W Woodburn; M Wright; T D Mody; Q Fan; J L Sessler; W C Dow; R A Miller
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.421

10.  Melanin and blood concentration in a human skin model studied by multiple regression analysis: assessment by Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  M Shimada; Y Yamada; M Itoh; T Yatagai
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A review of in-vivo optical properties of human tissues and its impact on PDT.

Authors:  Julia L Sandell; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.207

2.  Monte Carlo modelling of fluorescence in semi-infinite turbid media.

Authors:  Yi Hong Ong; Jarod C Finlay; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-02-26

3.  Light Dosimetry at Tissue Surfaces for Oblique Incident Circular Fields.

Authors:  Timothy C Zhu; Jarod C Finlay; Andreea Dimofte; Stephen M Hahn
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2004

4.  Analytic function for predicting light fluence rate of circular fields on a semi-infinite turbid medium.

Authors:  Yi Hong Ong; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  An improved analytic function for predicting light fluence rate in circular fields on a semi-infinite geometry.

Authors:  Timothy C Zhu; Amy Lu; Yi-Hong Ong
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-07

6.  Explicit dosimetry for 2-(1-hexyloxyethyl)-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a-mediated photodynamic therapy: macroscopic singlet oxygen modeling.

Authors:  Rozhin Penjweini; Baochang Liu; Michele M Kim; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  A Novel Prospective Study Assessing the Combination of Photodynamic Therapy and Proton Radiation Therapy: Safety and Outcomes When Treating Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Stephanie R Rice; Yun R Li; Theresa M Busch; Michele M Kim; Sally McNulty; Andrea Dimofte; Timothy C Zhu; Keith A Cengel; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.421

8.  PDT dose dosimetry for Photofrin-mediated pleural photodynamic therapy (pPDT).

Authors:  Yi Hong Ong; Michele M Kim; Jarod C Finlay; Andreea Dimofte; Sunil Singhal; Eli Glatstein; Keith A Cengel; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A Comparison of Singlet Oxygen Explicit Dosimetry (SOED) and Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Dosimetry (SOLD) for Photofrin-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Michele M Kim; Rozhin Penjweini; Nathan R Gemmell; Israel Veilleux; Aongus McCarthy; Gerald S Buller; Robert H Hadfield; Brian C Wilson; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.