Literature DB >> 26144967

Transformation from a retinal to a cyclopean representation in human visual cortex.

Martijn Barendregt1, Ben M Harvey2, Bas Rokers3, Serge O Dumoulin4.   

Abstract

We experience our visual world as seen from a single viewpoint, even though our two eyes receive slightly different images. One role of the visual system is to combine the two retinal images into a single representation of the visual field, sometimes called the cyclopean image [1]. Conventional terminology, i.e. retinotopy, implies that the topographic organization of visual areas is maintained throughout visual cortex [2]. However, following the hypothesis that a transformation occurs from a representation of the two retinal images (retinotopy) to a representation of a single cyclopean image (cyclopotopy), we set out to identify the stage in visual processing at which this transformation occurs in the human brain. Using binocular stimuli, population receptive field mapping (pRF), and ultra-high-field (7 T) fMRI, we find that responses in striate cortex (V1) best reflect stimulus position in the two retinal images. In extrastriate cortex (from V2 to LO), on the other hand, responses better reflect stimulus position in the cyclopean image. These results pinpoint the location of the transformation from a retinal to a cyclopean representation and contribute to an understanding of the transition from sensory to perceptual stimulus space in the human brain.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26144967     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  9 in total

1.  How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker.

Authors:  Cheng S Qian; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Which way and how far? Tracking of translation and rotation information for human path integration.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; Katherine R Sherrill; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Differential patterns of 2D location versus depth decoding along the visual hierarchy.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Xiaoli Zhang; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Binocular Mechanisms of 3D Motion Processing.

Authors:  Lawrence K Cormack; Thaddeus B Czuba; Jonas Knöll; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 6.422

5.  A binocular synaptic network supports interocular response alignment in visual cortical neurons.

Authors:  Benjamin Scholl; Clara Tepohl; Melissa A Ryan; Connon I Thomas; Naomi Kamasawa; David Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 18.688

6.  Feature-location binding in 3D: Feature judgments are biased by 2D location but not position-in-depth.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Sensitivity to an Illusion of Sound Location in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Susan A McLaughlin; Sandra Da Costa; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-23

8.  There and Back Again: Hippocampus and Retrosplenial Cortex Track Homing Distance during Human Path Integration.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; Katherine R Sherrill; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Human primary visual cortex shows larger population receptive fields for binocular disparity-defined stimuli.

Authors:  Ivan Alvarez; Samuel A Hurley; Andrew J Parker; Holly Bridge
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.270

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.