BACKGROUND: It has been unclear whether repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids are beneficial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (20 January 2015), searched reference lists of retrieved studies and contacted authors for further data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of women who had already received a single course of corticosteroids seven or more days previously and considered still at risk of preterm birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials (a total of 4733 women and 5700 babies) with low to moderate risk of bias. Treatment of women who remain at risk of preterm birth seven or more days after an initial course of prenatal corticosteroids with repeat dose(s), compared with no repeat corticosteroid treatment, reduced the risk of their infants experiencing the primary outcomes respiratory distress syndrome (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 0.91, eight trials, 3206 infants, number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 17, 95% CI 11 to 32) and serious infant outcome (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.94, seven trials, 5094 infants, NNTB 30, 95% CI 19 to 79).Treatment with repeat dose(s) of corticosteroid was associated with a reduction in mean birthweight (mean difference (MD) -75.79 g, 95% CI -117.63 to -33.96, nine trials, 5626 infants). However, outcomes that adjusted birthweight for gestational age (birthweight Z scores, birthweight multiples of the median and small-for-gestational age) did not differ between treatment groups.At early childhood follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen for infants exposed to repeat prenatal corticosteroids compared with unexposed infants for the primary outcomes (total deaths; survival free of any disability or major disability; disability; or serious outcome) or in the secondary outcome growth assessments. In women, for the two primary outcomes, there was no increase in infectious morbidity of chorioamnionitis or puerperal sepsis, and the likelihood of a caesarean birth was unchanged. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The short-term benefits for babies of less respiratory distress and fewer serious health problems in the first few weeks after birth support the use of repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids for women still at risk of preterm birth seven days or more after an initial course. These benefits were associated with a small reduction in size at birth. The current available evidence reassuringly shows no significant harm in early childhood, although no benefit.Further research is needed on the long-term benefits and risks for the woman and baby. Individual patient data meta-analysis may clarify how to maximise benefit and minimise harm.
BACKGROUND: It has been unclear whether repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids are beneficial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (20 January 2015), searched reference lists of retrieved studies and contacted authors for further data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of women who had already received a single course of corticosteroids seven or more days previously and considered still at risk of preterm birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials (a total of 4733 women and 5700 babies) with low to moderate risk of bias. Treatment of women who remain at risk of preterm birth seven or more days after an initial course of prenatal corticosteroids with repeat dose(s), compared with no repeat corticosteroid treatment, reduced the risk of their infants experiencing the primary outcomes respiratory distress syndrome (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 0.91, eight trials, 3206 infants, number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 17, 95% CI 11 to 32) and serious infant outcome (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.94, seven trials, 5094 infants, NNTB 30, 95% CI 19 to 79).Treatment with repeat dose(s) of corticosteroid was associated with a reduction in mean birthweight (mean difference (MD) -75.79 g, 95% CI -117.63 to -33.96, nine trials, 5626 infants). However, outcomes that adjusted birthweight for gestational age (birthweight Z scores, birthweight multiples of the median and small-for-gestational age) did not differ between treatment groups.At early childhood follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen for infants exposed to repeat prenatal corticosteroids compared with unexposed infants for the primary outcomes (total deaths; survival free of any disability or major disability; disability; or serious outcome) or in the secondary outcome growth assessments. In women, for the two primary outcomes, there was no increase in infectious morbidity of chorioamnionitis or puerperal sepsis, and the likelihood of a caesarean birth was unchanged. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The short-term benefits for babies of less respiratory distress and fewer serious health problems in the first few weeks after birth support the use of repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids for women still at risk of preterm birth seven days or more after an initial course. These benefits were associated with a small reduction in size at birth. The current available evidence reassuringly shows no significant harm in early childhood, although no benefit.Further research is needed on the long-term benefits and risks for the woman and baby. Individual patient data meta-analysis may clarify how to maximise benefit and minimise harm.
Authors: Jason N Hashima; Yinglei Lai; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Donald J Dudley; Alan Peaceman; Catherine Y Spong; Jay D Iams; Kenneth J Leveno; Margaret Harper; Steve N Caritis; Michael Varner; Menachem Miodovnik; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Mary J O'Sullivan; Susan M Ramin; Marshall Carpenter; Dwight J Rouse; Baha Sibai Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Michael W Church; Ronald J Wapner; Lisa M Mele; Francee Johnson; Donald J Dudley; Catherine Y Spong; Alan M Peaceman; Atef H Moawad; Mary J O'Sullivan; Menachem Miodovnik Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2010-05-27 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Elizabeth V Asztalos; Kellie E Murphy; Mary E Hannah; Andrew R Willan; Stephen G Matthews; Arne Ohlsson; Edmond N Kelly; Saroj Saigal; Susan Ross; Marie-France Delisle; Kofi Amankwah; Patricia Guselle; Amiram Gafni; Shoo K Lee; B Anthony Armson; Renee Sananes; Laura Tomat Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Elizabeth A Thom; Francee Johnson; Donald J Dudley; Catherine Y Spong; Alan M Peaceman; Kenneth J Leveno; Margaret Harper; Steve N Caritis; Menachem Miodovnik; Brian Mercer; John M Thorp; Atef Moawad; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Susan Ramin; Marshall W Carpenter; Dwight J Rouse; Baha Sibai; Steven G Gabbe Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-07-17 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: O M Peltoniemi; M A Kari; A Lano; A Yliherva; R Puosi; L Lehtonen; O Tammela; M Hallman Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Lisa Mele; Francee Johnson; Donald J Dudley; Catherine Y Spong; Alan M Peaceman; Kenneth J Leveno; Fergal Malone; Steve N Caritis; Brian Mercer; Margaret Harper; Dwight J Rouse; John M Thorp; Susan Ramin; Marshall W Carpenter; Steven G Gabbe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martijn J J Finken; Bibian van der Voorn; Jonneke J Hollanders; Charlotte A Ruys; Marita de Waard; Johannes B van Goudoever; Joost Rotteveel Journal: Ann Nutr Metab Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 3.374
Authors: Montse Palacio; Elisenda Bonet-Carne; Teresa Cobo; Alvaro Perez-Moreno; Joan Sabrià; Jute Richter; Marian Kacerovsky; Bo Jacobsson; Raúl A García-Posada; Fernando Bugatto; Ramon Santisteve; Àngels Vives; Mauro Parra-Cordero; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; José Luis Bartha; Pilar Carretero-Lucena; Kai Lit Tan; Rogelio Cruz-Martínez; Minke Burke; Suseela Vavilala; Igor Iruretagoyena; Juan Luis Delgado; Mauro Schenone; Josep Vilanova; Francesc Botet; George S H Yeo; Jon Hyett; Jan Deprest; Roberto Romero; Eduard Gratacos Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Augusto F Schmidt; Matthew W Kemp; Paranthaman S Kannan; Boris W Kramer; John P Newnham; Suhas G Kallapur; Alan H Jobe Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 3.756