Alison A Little1, Karen Kamholz1, Brian K Corwin1, Alejandra Barrero-Castillero1, C Jason Wang2. 1. Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention & Division of General Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. 2. Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention & Division of General Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. Electronic address: cjwang1@stanford.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore existing barriers and challenges to Early Intervention (EI) referral, enrollment, and service provision for very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g) infants. METHODS: We conducted 10 focus groups with parents of VLBW children (n = 44) and 32 interviews with key informants from EI (n = 7), neonatal intensive care units (n = 17), and outpatient clinics (n = 8) at 6 sites in 2 states. We used grounded theory to identify themes about gaps in services. RESULTS: Both parents and providers found EI helpful. However, they also identified gaps in the current EI system at the levels of eligibility, referral, family receptivity, and service provision and coordination with medical care. Inadequate funding and variable procedures for evaluation may affect children's eligibility. Referrals can be missed as a result of simple oversight or communication failure among hospitals, EI, and families; referral outcomes often are not formally tracked. Families may not be receptive to services as a result of wariness of home visits, social stressors, denial about potential developmental delays, or lack of understanding of the benefits of EI. Once a child is deemed eligible, services may be delayed or terminated early, and EI providers may have little specialized training. Communication and coordination with the child's medical care team is often limited. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic barriers, including funding and staffing issues, state and federal regulations, and communication with families and medical providers, have led to gaps in the EI system. The chronic care model may serve as a framework for integrating community-based interventions like EI with medical care for VLBW children and other vulnerable populations.
OBJECTIVE: To explore existing barriers and challenges to Early Intervention (EI) referral, enrollment, and service provision for very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g) infants. METHODS: We conducted 10 focus groups with parents of VLBW children (n = 44) and 32 interviews with key informants from EI (n = 7), neonatal intensive care units (n = 17), and outpatient clinics (n = 8) at 6 sites in 2 states. We used grounded theory to identify themes about gaps in services. RESULTS: Both parents and providers found EI helpful. However, they also identified gaps in the current EI system at the levels of eligibility, referral, family receptivity, and service provision and coordination with medical care. Inadequate funding and variable procedures for evaluation may affect children's eligibility. Referrals can be missed as a result of simple oversight or communication failure among hospitals, EI, and families; referral outcomes often are not formally tracked. Families may not be receptive to services as a result of wariness of home visits, social stressors, denial about potential developmental delays, or lack of understanding of the benefits of EI. Once a child is deemed eligible, services may be delayed or terminated early, and EI providers may have little specialized training. Communication and coordination with the child's medical care team is often limited. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic barriers, including funding and staffing issues, state and federal regulations, and communication with families and medical providers, have led to gaps in the EI system. The chronic care model may serve as a framework for integrating community-based interventions like EI with medical care for VLBW children and other vulnerable populations.
Authors: Stacey C Dusing; Jennifer C Burnsed; Shaaron E Brown; Amy D Harper; Karen D Hendricks-Munoz; Richard D Stevenson; Leroy R Thacker; Rebecca M Molinini Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2020-08-12
Authors: Elizabeth Peacock-Chambers; JoAnna K Leyenaar; Sheila Foss; Emily Feinberg; Donna Wilson; Peter D Friedmann; Paul Visintainer; Rachana Singh Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Rebecca C Fauth; Chie Kotake; Susan E Manning; Jessica L Goldberg; M Ann Easterbrooks; Beth Buxton; Karin Downs Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2022-10-22
Authors: Matthew L Romo; Katharine H McVeigh; Phoebe Jordan; Jeanette A Stingone; Pui Ying Chan; George L Askew Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 2.341