Literature DB >> 26142000

"People Say It's a Little Uncomfortable": Prenatal Genetic Counselors' Use of Constructed Dialogue to Reference Procedural Pain.

Cynthia Gordon1, Michele B Prince, Judith L Benkendorf, Heidi E Hamilton.   

Abstract

Prenatal genetic counseling involves an exchange of information between counselors and clients, including verbal descriptions of the potential pain of invasive prenatal diagnosis procedures such as amniocentesis. This paper describes the use of one linguistic feature in one context. It considers how two counselors describe procedural pain in 17 prenatal genetic counseling sessions, audiotaped as part of a larger data-driven study using sociolinguistic methodologies to characterize the discourse of genetic counseling. Analysis reveals that "constructed dialogue," or reporting something another person said, is a strategy used frequently by the counselors for describing procedural pain. Examination of the content and form of the constructed dialogue uncovered three recurring patterns that relate to its functions in the sessions: (1) inclusion of colloquial vocabulary; (2) references to common experiences through similes; and (3) explicit downplaying of pain. This analysis suggests that the naturally occurring phenomenon of quoting the words of others can be used in genetic counseling to impart information while simultaneously reassuring the client and creating counselor-client rapport. The complex relationship between the use of constructed dialogue and the enactment of genetic counseling principles through talk is also discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 26142000     DOI: 10.1023/A:1016326431443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  7 in total

1.  Does indirect speech promote nondirective genetic counseling? Results of a sociolinguistic investigation.

Authors:  J L Benkendorf; M B Prince; M A Rose; A De Fina; H E Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

2.  National Society of Genetic Counselors code of ethics.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  [Psychological aspects of pain experience in amniocentesis].

Authors:  M Dorfer; M Häusler; F Kainer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Genetic counseling principles in action: a casebook.

Authors:  J H Marks; A Heimler; E Reich; N S Wexler; S E Ince
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1989

5.  Does local anesthesia at mid-trimester amniocentesis decrease pain experience? A randomized trial in 220 patients.

Authors:  D Van Schoubroeck; J Verhaeghe
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Amniocentesis and rhaphiphobia: a preliminary survey.

Authors:  J A Peters
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1984

7.  Pain with amniocentesis and transabdominal CVS.

Authors:  L de Crespigny; H P Robinson; A Ngu
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.100

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Doctor's expertise and managing discrepant information from other sources in genetic counseling: a conversation analytic perspective.

Authors:  Esa Lehtinen; Helena Kääriäinen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  "SLANG"--Sensitive Language and the New Genetics--an exploratory study.

Authors:  J Hodgson; E Hughes; C Lambert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.