Comparison of T1ρ and T2* Relaxation Mapping in Patients with Different Grades of Disc Degeneration at 3T MR.

BACKGROUND: T1ρ and T2* relaxation times are capable of providing information about early biochemical changes in intervertebral disk degeneration (IVDD). The purpose of this study was to assess and compare T1ρ and T2* mapping in IVDD with reference to Pfirrmann grade.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lumbar sagittal T2-weighted, T1ρ and T2* relaxation MRI were performed at 3.0T in 42 subjects covering discs L1-L2 to L5-S1. All the discs were morphologically assessed according to the Pfirrmann grade. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn over the T1ρ and T2*mappings, including nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF). Wilcoxon signed rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman rank correlation were performed.
RESULTS: The difference in T1ρ and T2* values between NP and AF were highly significant (P<0.001). The trends of decreasing T1ρ and T2* values of both NP and AF with increasing Pfirrmann grades was significant (P<0.01), particularly between Pfirrmann grade II and III (P<0.001), whereas T2* mapping was additionally able to detect changes in the AF between Pfirrmann grade I and II (P<0.05). Pfirrmann grades were inversely significantly correlated with both T1ρ and T2* values in the NP (r=-0.69, P<0.001; r=-0.56, P<0.001) and AF (r=-0.45, P<0.001; r=-0.26, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The process of IVDD can be detected by T1ρ and T2* mapping, particularly at early stage, and both methodologies displayed roughly comparable performance.

Background

The prevalence of low back pain (medscimonit-21-1934) ranges from 6.0% to 15.7% across the world; it accounts for 49.6% of the global disability burden and causes an enormous economic impact [1-3]. It was estimated that 41.8% of LBP can be attributed to intervertebral disk degeneration (IVDD) [4]. Several radiographic findings, such as internal disk dehydration, end-plate sclerosis, and loss of disk height, have been identified on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with IVDD. Pfirrmann et al. described a grading system to assess the morphologic changes of IVDD based on standard T2-weighted MRI for research and clinical purposes [5]. Although Pfirrmann grading system is useful, it is subjective and insufficient to detect early-onset IVDD [6]; thus, quantification of the degeneration process is needed to promote disc health evaluation [7].

Over the past decade, new quantitative MRI techniques such as T2- [8-10], T1ρ-[6,11,12], T2*-relaxation time [10,13,14], diffusion-weighted imaging [15], spectroscopy [16], and delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI [17] have been explored in hopes of revealing early biochemical changes in IVDD, elucidating the degeneration progress, and possibly helping clinicians initiate timely biologic therapies with injected growth factors, genetic material, and stem cells [18,19]. In T1ρ sequence, a “spin lock” pulse is applied to the magnetization transversely and T1ρ relaxation time is considered to be sensitive to protons on macromolecules such as glycosaminoglycan (GAG) [20], providing a potential to detect the loss of proteoglycan in IVDD [10]. In vitro studies have reported a correlation between T1ρ and GAG content in the nucleus pulposus (NP) [21,22]. Several investigators have found that T1ρ is correlated with Pfirrmann degenerative grade [6,8,12,21] and clinical symptoms assessed by health questionnaires [16,23]. T2* relaxation times provide information regarding the spatial macromolecule architecture in conjunction with water molecule mobility [7], which has been reported to be a reliable tool for quantitative assessment of various cartilaginous tissues [24-26]. Recent studies have established the relationship between T2* value and Pfirrmann scoring system, as well as macroscopic and histological grading in IVDD, where a decrease in T2* relaxation time was significantly correlated with a higher degree of disc degeneration [10,13]. Animal and human cadaveric studies showed a good correlation between T2* relaxation time and GAG content throughout the discs, as well as between T2* relaxation time and mechanical health [7,13,14]. However, little is known about the relative performance of T1ρ and T2* relaxation times in their assessment of disc degeneration. The purpose of the current in vivo 3.0-T MRI study was to assess and compare T1ρ and T2* relaxation time measurements in IVDD with reference to the morphological Pfirrmann grading systems.

Material and Methods

This prospective study was approved by our institute’s research ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to the study.

Subjects

From October 2013 to September 2014, 50 consecutive subjects with single or recurrent episodes of low back pain presented initially to the outpatient spine clinic and then were referred for a lumbar MRI. Inclusion criteria were patients with single or recurrent episodes of low back pain, and radiologic screening and conventional MRI confirmation of no other spine diseases except disc degeneration. Exclusion criteria were a body mass index greater than 25, spinal malignancy, spine fractures, spinal infection, lumbar scoliosis, sacroiliac arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic bone disease, previous spine surgery or interventional treatment, and contraindications for MR imaging.

MR imaging protocol

MRI was performed in the morning for all subjects to reduce the potential influence of diurnal variation in intervertebral disks. All MRI examinations were performed by a 3.0T scanner (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) and a dedicated 15-channel SENSE spine coil. First, conventional sagittal T2-weighted images were acquired by using a turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE=2500 ms/90 ms, flip angle=90°, field of view=220 mm, NSA=2, and scan time=1 min 40 s. Next, a series of sagittal T1ρ and T2*quantification sequences were performed. The T1ρ-weighted images were obtained with a 3D balanced fast field echo (b-FFE) sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE=4.8 ms/2.4 ms, flip angle=50°, NSA=1. Five subsequent T1ρ-weighted scans were performed with spin lock durations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ms, spin-lock frequency of 500Hz, and with scan time of 1 min 9 s for each scan. The T2* relaxation time measurements were acquired by a fast field echo (FFE) sequence with the following parameters: TR/TEs =310ms/5.1; 10.0; 14.9; 19.8; 24.7ms, flip angle=25°, NSA=4, and acquisition time=2min46s. To guarantee the same in-plane and out-of-plane resolution for better comparability between the T1ρ and T2* sequences, the following parameters were kept consistent: field of view=220 mm, matrix=432×432, slice thickness=5 mm, slices=9, voxel size=0.57×0.57×5.00 mm3.

Image post-processing and analysis

MR images were transferred to a workstation (Extended MR Workspace, version 2.6.3.2, Philips Healthcare). Two radiologists (with 5 and 10 years of experience in musculoskeletal radiology) independently assessed the five lumbar discs in each subject on the mid-sagittal T2-weighted images according to the Pfirrmann grading system [5]: grade I, homogeneous shape, bright hyperintense white signal intensity, normal disc height, and clear distinction of annulus fibrosus (AF) and NP; grade II, nonhomogeneous shape with or without horizontal gray bands, hyperintense white signal, normal disc height, clear distinction of AF and NP; grade III, nonhomogeneous shape, intermediate gray signal intensity, normal or slightly decreased height, and unclear distinction of AF and NP; grade IV, nonhomogeneous shape, hypointense dark gray signal intensity, normal to moderate decrease in height, and lost distinction of AF and NP; and grade V, same as grade IV but collapsed disc space. In cases of discrepancy, a consensus reading was obtained.

The T1ρ-weighted images were fitted on a pixel by pixel basis to the exponentially decaying T1ρ function using IDL 6.3 (ITT Visual Information Solutions, Boulder, CO) to generate a T1ρ relaxation map, and the T2*-weighed image analyses were conducted by using Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) [19]. Regions of interest (ROIs) were set manually on the T1ρ and T2* mappings with reference to the T2 images. The ROIs were drawn on the NP, anterior AF (AAF) and posterior AF (PAF). Values of AAF and PAF were averaged as the value for AF. Care was taken to exclude an apparent tear of annulus in the ROIs. The ROI sizes for NP were 10~55 mm2, while the ROI sizes for AF (anterior and posterior) were 10~45 mm2. All the measurements were performed twice by a single observer with an interval of four weeks.

Statistical analysis

The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) was used to assess the reproducibility in two measurements of T1ρ and T2* relaxation times, and ICC values that were ≥0.75 were considered excellent agreement [27]. The differences of T1ρ, T2* relaxation times between NP and AF were tested using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, as well as between AAF and PAF. Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc tests were applied to compare the difference in T1ρ and T2 values of various disc degeneration grades of NP and AF. Associations between T1ρ, T2* relaxation times and Pfirrmann grade were tested using Spearman rank correlation. Correlations were considered strong for r>0.7, moderate for 0.5< r≤0.7, and weak for r≤0.5 [21]. All statistical analysis was performed by PASW Statistics software (v17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General data

Of the 50 patients recruited during the study period, 8 patients were excluded for the following reasons: body mass index greater than 25 (n=3); sacroiliac arthritis (n=2), and motion artifacts (n=3). A total of 42 subjects (30 men, 12 women; rang, 21~80 years; mean age, 44.2 years) with 210 intervertebral lumbar disks from L1–2 to L5–S1 were included in this study.

The distribution of the T1ρ and T2* values of the 210 intervertebral disks with respect to the Pfirrmann grading is provided in Table 1 and Figure 1A, 1B. Representative T1ρ and T2* maps of subjects with different grades of degeneration are shown in Figure 2. In the reliability of measurements, ICCs with 95% CIs for each technique at different ROIs are shown in Table 2; the reproducibility between the two measurements was excellent (ICC=0.909~0.969). T1ρ relaxation time ranged from 73.8 to 235.1ms for NP, and from 55.7 to 173.8 ms for AF, while T2* relaxation times ranged from 9.6 to 185.8 ms for NP, and from 12.0 to 52.7 ms for AF. The difference in T1ρ and T2* values between NP and AF were highly significant (both P<0.001), and the difference in T1ρ and T2* values between AAF and PAF were also highly significant (both P<0.01).

Table 1

T1ρ and T2* relaxation times on intervertebral disks with Pfirrmann grades.

Pfirrmann grade	n (%)#		T1ρ relaxation time (ms)				T2* relaxation time (ms)
			NP	AAF	PAF	AF	NP	AAF	PAF	AF
I	41 (19.5)	Median	172.3	107.6	119.7	114.3	83.8	27.6	33.3	31.6
		Mean	177.3	113.9	120.9	117.4	85.8	28.7	35.9	32.3
		SD	36.0	25.9	27.0	21.3	41.7	10.4	13.7	9.4
II	68 (32.4)	Median	170.0	114.4	120.1	119.6	59.8	25.3	27.4	27.3
		Mean	172.2	115.2	125.8	120.5	63.3	26.7	29.4	28.1
		SD	31.9	22.2	23.8	18.2	27.4	8.5	10.9	8.1
III	53 (25.3)	Median	121.9	99.3	102.5	100.2	40.8	26.6	26.1	26.4
		Mean	128.8	102.3	105.1	103.7	42.7	27.3	26.2	27.2
		SD	30.1	22.1	23.1	20.0	14.5	7.3	7.5	7.3
IV	41 (19.5)	Median	99.6	91.6	98.9	92.9	33.5	25.2	25.1	24.8
		Mean	105.7	94.6	101.2	97.9	33.9	24.6	25.8	25.3
		SD	21.5	16.6	17.8	15.2	12.1	7.1	7.3	6.2
V	7 (3.3)	Median	100.8	73.1	79.3	82.2	24.3	21.6	25.9	24.4
		Mean	99.1	77.6	85.4	81.5	26.1	20.4	24.2	22.3
		SD	12.2	17.1	18.7	14.4	11.2	5.1	5.4	4.4

NP – nucleus pulposus; AAF – anterior annulus fibrosus; PAF – posterior annulus fibrosus; AF – annulus fibrosus;

The percentages of patients assigned to each of the Pfirrmann grades on the basis of the T2-weighted image.

Figure 1

The distribution of the T1ρ and T2* values of nucleus pulposus (NP) (A) and annulus fibrosus (AF) (B) with respect to the Pfirrmann grades.

Figure 2

T2-weighted images and corresponding T1ρ and T2* maps in human intervertebral disk degeneration related to Pfirrmann grades.

Table 2

The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for intraobserver analysis of T1ρ and T2* mapping.

ROIs	T1ρ mapping		T2* mapping
	ICC	95% CI	ICC	95% CI
NP	0.955	0.941–0.966	0.969	0.959–0.976
AAF	0.932	0.886–0.950	0.937	0.893–0.957
PAF	0.913	0.878–0.936	0.909	0.865–0.932

ROI – regions of interest; NP – nucleus pulposus; AAF – anterior annulus fibrosus; PAF – posterior annulus fibrosus.

T1ρ and T2* values versus Pfirrmann grade

Boxplots of T1ρ and T2* values in NP and AF are shown in Figure 3, respectively, which showed trends of decreasing T1ρ and T2* values with increasing Pfirrmann grade. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference in T1ρ and T2* relaxation times of NP and AF among the Pfirrmann grade groups (P<0.01). For both T1ρ (Figure 3A) and T2* relaxation times (Figure 3B) in the NPs, a significant difference was found between Pfirrmann grade II and Pfirrmann grades greater than II (P<0.001), especially between Pfirrmann grade II and III, and the difference was not statistically significant between Pfirrmann grade I and II (P>0.05), nor between Pfirrmann grade IV and V (P>0.05). For AFs, the T1ρ (Figure 3C) values also showed Pfirrmann grade II was significantly different from Pfirrmann grades higher than II (P<0.001), particularly notable between Pfirrmann grades II and III; the T2* values (Figure 3D) demonstrated significant difference between Pfirrmann grade I and all the other grades (P<0.05).

Figure 3

Box plots show trends of decreasing T1ρ and T2* values of nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) with increasing Pfirrmann grades, and great T1ρ and T2* value decrease between Pfirrmann grades II and III. (A) T1ρ relaxation time of NP versus disc degeneration grading; (B) T2* relaxation time of NP versus disc degeneration grading; (C) T1ρ relaxation time of AF versus disc degeneration grading; (D) T2* relaxation time of AF versus disc degeneration grading. * P<0.05; *** P<0.001; n.s. not significant.

Correlations

Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated that Pfirrmann grades were inversely significantly correlated with both T1ρ and T2* values in the NP (r=−0.69, P<0.001 (Figure 4A); r=−0.56, P<0.001 (Figure 4B)) and AF(r=−0.45, P<0.001 (Figure 4C); r=−0.26, P<0.001 (Figure 4D)).

Figure 4

Scatter plots of T1ρ and T2* values in nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) according to the Pfirrmann grades. (A) Correlation between the T1ρ relaxation time of NP and degenerative grades. (B) Correlation between the T2* relaxation time of NP and degenerative grades. (C) Correlation between the T1ρ relaxation time of AF and degenerative grades. (D) Correlation between the T2* relaxation time of AF and degenerative grades.

Discussion

In this study, significant negative correlations were observed between the T1ρ, T2* relaxation times and the Pfirrmann grades. Moreover, both methodologies displayed roughly comparable performance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comparison of T1ρ and T2* relaxation times at 3 T MR in patients experiencing low back pain with different grades of disc degeneration.

The human intervertebral disc is composed of the central NP, the peripheral AF, and the endplates connecting to the vertebrae. Normally, the NP is gelatinous, well-hydrated, and mainly consists of proteoglycans enclosed by the type II collagen network, which produces a high internal hydrostatic pressure that allows the disk to support compressive load in the spine. The AF is characterized by concentric lamellae primarily of bundles of type I and III collagen, which serves as the limiting capsule of the NP [28,29]. In a healthy young adult, proteoglycan accounts for about 50% of the NP and 10–20% of the AF dry weight, while collagen accounts for approximately 15–20% of the NP and 65–70% of the AF dry weight [30]. At the earliest stages of IVDD, the proteoglycan degrades and its content decreases; thus, it is of great importance to probe this change in subjects with IVDD noninvasively. However, conventional MRIs are incapable of estimating the proteoglycan concentration in the disc [31]. New MR techniques such as T1ρ and T2* mapping provide information of biochemical composition in disc and thus allow detection of early changes in IVDD.

T1ρ relaxation time was obtained by using spin-lock radiofrequency field, which is related to slow motional interactions between macromolecules of extracellular matrix and bulk water [32]. Biochemical analysis on cadaveric human discs revealed that the T1ρ relaxation time was strongly correlated with proteoglycan content and was moderately correlated with water content [21,22]. Our results showed a decreasing trend in T1ρ values of both NP and AF with the increase of Pfirrmann grade, and the association between T1ρ values of NP and AF and Pfirrmann grade was significant (r=−0.69, P<0.001; r=−0.45, P<0.001), which is in agreement with previous reports that T1ρ values of AF decline significantly over disc degeneration [9] and that T1ρ values of NP are moderately correlated with Pfirrmann grade I–V disks of patients with low back pain [6].

T2* relaxation embraces the intrinsic “true” T2 relaxation and additional relaxation because of magnetic inhomogeneities, and is sensitive to the spatial macromolecule architecture and its interaction with water molecule mobility [7]. Recent studies have demonstrated the low-to-moderate correlation between T2* value and Pfirrmann grade, as well as T2* value and GAG content in IVDD [10,13]. In the present study, T2* relaxation times on NP were significantly higher than AF, and both T2* values were negatively correlated with Pfirrmann grades (r=−0.56, P<0.001; r=−0.26, P<0.001). Welsch et al. reported an increase in T2* values from the AAF to the NP and the subsequent decline from the NP to the PAF, and a decrease in T2* values on NP and PAF was significantly correlated with a higher Pfirrmann grade (r=−0.220~–0.334, p<0.01) in patients experiencing low back pain [10], which was comparable to our results.

With regard to the discernment of the single Pfirrmann grade, T1ρ and T2* mapping displayed roughly comparable performance. In particular, both T1ρ and T2* mapping seemed to be able to differentiate between Pfirrmann grade II and III, as well as between Pfirrmann grade III and IV. A relatively larger decline in T1ρ and T2* values between Pfirrmann grades II and III was observed, which probably was due to rapid degeneration of lumbar intervertebral discs confirmed in an animal model by Zhou et al. [6]. Moreover, T2* values of AF demonstrated a significant difference between Pfirrmann grade I and II, indicting T2* relaxation time might not only be sensitive to GAG content, but also to collagen integrity [10].

Probing the early changes in the degeneration process of intervertebral discs would be beneficial for timely developing and applying new therapeutics [18,19]. The Pfirrmann classification cannot provide quantitative and objective evaluation of early IVDD. This deficit may be filled by T1ρ and T2* relaxation time measurements. Particularly in the longitudinal follow-up of patients with IVDD, T1ρ and T2* values might provide a reliable quantification of longitudinal biochemical changes of degeneration [10]. T1ρ and T2* mapping in this work showed roughly comparable performance in assessing the biochemical content of the IVDD. However, T1ρ-weighted imaging is not yet easily applicable on standard MRI scanners, while T2* mapping could be routinely available on a clinical MR scanner [11]. Additionally, the acquisition time on T2* mapping was almost half of that on the T1ρ mapping (2 min 46 s vs. 5 min 45 s). Hence, T2* mapping is more promising than T1ρ mapping in diagnosing IVDD in routine clinical practice.

There are several limitations in this study. On the one hand, the present results were not verified by histological and biochemical findings, partly because of inability in obtaining specimens from human subjects. On the other hand, the relation between the T1ρ or T2* mapping and physical symptoms was not investigated, particularly the degree and duration of LBP, as various causes account for discogenic LBP (such as innervations and tear of the annulus) and the mechanism by which IVDD leads to LBP remains unclear [23]. Besides, comparison of the sex difference in T1ρ values at different levels showed a significant lower value in the female discs at L3–L4 and L4–L5 discs of the NP, and at L3–L4 disc of the AF [12], but the assessments of T1ρ and T2* relation times according to the anatomic level of each disc and sex were not performed in this study because the size of women was small and the emphasis of current study was on the relative performance of T1ρ and T2* mapping. To draw more detailed and definitive conclusions during the process of disc degeneration, further studies including a large number of patients with multiple follow-up MRI and in vitro investigations are needed.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results show that the T1ρ and T2* values significantly and negatively correlate with the Pfirrmann grades of disc degeneration, and both methodologies displayed roughly comparable performance. T1ρ and T2* relaxation time measurements may promote the detection of IVDD at a relatively early stage.