Literature DB >> 26141077

The effectiveness of noninvasive interventions for musculoskeletal thoracic spine and chest wall pain: a systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) collaboration.

Danielle Southerst1, Andrée-Anne Marchand2, Pierre Côté3, Heather M Shearer4, Jessica J Wong5, Sharanya Varatharajan6, Kristi Randhawa6, Deborah Sutton7, Hainan Yu8, Douglas P Gross9, Craig Jacobs10, Rachel Goldgrub11, Maja Stupar12, Silvano Mior13, Linda J Carroll14, Anne Taylor-Vaisey15.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to critically appraise and synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of noninvasive interventions, excluding pharmacological treatments, for musculoskeletal thoracic pain.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating the effectiveness of noninvasive interventions were eligible. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials accessed through Ovid Technologies, Inc, and CINAHL Plus with Full Text accessed through EBSCOhost from 1990 to 2015. Our search strategies combined controlled vocabulary relevant to each database (eg, MeSH for MEDLINE) and text words relevant to our research question and the inclusion criteria. Random pairs of independent reviewers screened studies for relevance and critically appraised relevant studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Studies with a low risk of bias were synthesized following best evidence synthesis principles.
RESULTS: We screened 6988 articles and critically appraised 2 studies. Both studies had a low risk of bias and were included in our synthesis. One RCT compared thoracic spinal manipulation, needle acupuncture, and placebo electrotherapy for recent thoracic spine pain. There were statistically significant but clinically nonimportant short-term reductions in pain favoring manipulation. There were no differences between acupuncture and placebo electrotherapy. Another RCT compared a multimodal program of care and a session of education for recent musculoskeletal chest wall pain. The multimodal care resulted in statistically significant but clinically nonimportant short-term reductions in pain over education. However, participants receiving multimodal care were more likely to report important improvements in chest pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Quality evidence on the management of musculoskeletal thoracic pain is sparse. The current evidence suggests that compared to placebo, spinal manipulation is associated with a small and clinically nonimportant reduction in pain intensity and that acupuncture leads to similar outcomes as placebo. Furthermore, a multimodal program of care (ie, manual therapy, soft tissue therapy, exercises, heat/ice, and advice) and a single education session lead to similar pain reduction for recent-onset musculoskeletal chest wall pain. However, patients who receive multimodal care are more likely to report pain improvements.
Copyright © 2015 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acupuncture; Musculoskeletal Manipulations; Musculoskeletal Pain; Patient Education as Topic; Physical Therapy Modalities; Review Literature as Topic; Thoracic Vertebrae; Thoracic Wall

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26141077     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  7 in total

1.  Nonoperative management of degenerative cervical radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua Plener; Carlo Ammendolia; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2022-04

Review 2.  Spine Care as a Framework for the Chiropractic Identity.

Authors:  Michael Schneider; Donald Murphy; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  J Chiropr Humanit       Date:  2016-11-04

Review 3.  The risk associated with spinal manipulation: an overview of reviews.

Authors:  Sabrina Mai Nielsen; Simon Tarp; Robin Christensen; Henning Bliddal; Louise Klokker; Marius Henriksen
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-24

Review 4.  Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions.

Authors:  Ava Lorenc; Gene Feder; Hugh MacPherson; Paul Little; Stewart W Mercer; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Factors Associated With Clinical Responses to Spinal Manipulation in Patients With Non-specific Thoracic Back Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mégane Pasquier; James J Young; Arnaud Lardon; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  Spinal pain patients seeking care in primary care and referred to physiotherapy: A cross-sectional study on patients characteristics, referral information and physiotherapy care offered by general practitioners and physiotherapists in France.

Authors:  Anthony Demont; Leila Benaïssa; Valentine Recoque; François Desmeules; Aurélie Bourmaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Spinal manipulative therapy, Graston technique® and placebo for non-specific thoracic spine pain: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amy L Crothers; Simon D French; Jeff J Hebert; Bruce F Walker
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-05-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.