Kristine Hermansen Grunewaldt1,2, Jon Skranes1,3, Ann-Mari Brubakk1,2, Gro C C Lähaugen1,3. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. 2. Department of Pediatrics, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Sørlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway.
Abstract
AIM: Working memory deficits are frequently found in children born preterm and have been linked to learning disabilities, and cognitive and behavioural problems. Our aim was to evaluate if a computerized working memory training program has long-term positive effects on memory, learning, and behaviour in very-low-birthweight (VLBW) children at age 5 to 6 years. METHOD: This prospective, intervention study included 20 VLBW preschool children in the intervention group and 17 age-matched, non-training VLBW children in the comparison group. The intervention group trained with the Cogmed JM working memory training program daily for 5 weeks (25 training sessions). Extensive neuropsychological assessment and parental questionnaires were performed 4 weeks after intervention and at follow-up 7 months later. For most of the statistical analyses, general linear models were applied. RESULTS: At follow-up, higher scores and increased or equal performance gain were found in the intervention group than the comparison group on memory for faces (p=0.012), narrative memory (p=0.002), and spatial span (p=0.003). No group differences in performance gain were found for attention and behaviour. INTERPRETATION:Computerized working memory training seems to have positive and persisting effects on working memory, and visual and verbal learning, at 7-month follow-up in VLBW preschool children. We speculate that such training is beneficial by improving the ability to learn from the teaching at school and for further cognitive development.
RCT Entities:
AIM: Working memory deficits are frequently found in children born preterm and have been linked to learning disabilities, and cognitive and behavioural problems. Our aim was to evaluate if a computerized working memory training program has long-term positive effects on memory, learning, and behaviour in very-low-birthweight (VLBW) children at age 5 to 6 years. METHOD: This prospective, intervention study included 20 VLBW preschool children in the intervention group and 17 age-matched, non-training VLBW children in the comparison group. The intervention group trained with the Cogmed JM working memory training program daily for 5 weeks (25 training sessions). Extensive neuropsychological assessment and parental questionnaires were performed 4 weeks after intervention and at follow-up 7 months later. For most of the statistical analyses, general linear models were applied. RESULTS: At follow-up, higher scores and increased or equal performance gain were found in the intervention group than the comparison group on memory for faces (p=0.012), narrative memory (p=0.002), and spatial span (p=0.003). No group differences in performance gain were found for attention and behaviour. INTERPRETATION: Computerized working memory training seems to have positive and persisting effects on working memory, and visual and verbal learning, at 7-month follow-up in VLBW preschool children. We speculate that such training is beneficial by improving the ability to learn from the teaching at school and for further cognitive development.
Authors: Maria Chiara Di Lieto; Chiara Pecini; Paola Brovedani; Giuseppina Sgandurra; Marta Dell'Omo; Anna Maria Chilosi; Andrea Guzzetta; Silvia Perazza; Elisa Sicola; Giovanni Cioni Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: In Young Sung; Jae Yong Jeon; Ki Jeong Yun; Jin Sook Yuk; Eun Me Byun; Han-Wook Yoo; Tae-Sung Ko; Hyo-Won Kim; Dae-Hyun Jang Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Claire E Kelly; Deanne K Thompson; Jian Chen; Elisha K Josev; Leona Pascoe; Megan M Spencer-Smith; Chris Adamson; Chiara Nosarti; Susan Gathercole; Gehan Roberts; Katherine J Lee; Lex W Doyle; Marc L Seal; Peter J Anderson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 5.038