| Literature DB >> 26140376 |
Erminda Tsouko1, Constantina Kourmentza2, Dimitrios Ladakis3, Nikolaos Kopsahelis4, Ioanna Mandala5, Seraphim Papanikolaou6, Fotis Paloukis7, Vitor Alves8, Apostolis Koutinas9.
Abstract
The utilization of fermentation media derived from waste and by-product streams from biodiesel and confectionery industries could lead to highly efficient production of bacterial cellulose. Batch fermentations with the bacterial strain Komagataeibacter sucrofermentans DSM (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen) 15973 were initially carried out in synthetic media using commercial sugars and crude glycerol. The highest bacterial cellulose concentration was achieved when crude glycerol (3.2 g/L) and commercial sucrose (4.9 g/L) were used. The combination of crude glycerol and sunflower meal hydrolysates as the sole fermentation media resulted in bacterial cellulose production of 13.3 g/L. Similar results (13 g/L) were obtained when flour-rich hydrolysates produced from confectionery industry waste streams were used. The properties of bacterial celluloses developed when different fermentation media were used showed water holding capacities of 102-138 g · water/g · dry bacterial cellulose, viscosities of 4.7-9.3 dL/g, degree of polymerization of 1889.1-2672.8, stress at break of 72.3-139.5 MPa and Young's modulus of 0.97-1.64 GPa. This study demonstrated that by-product streams from the biodiesel industry and waste streams from confectionery industries could be used as the sole sources of nutrients for the production of bacterial cellulose with similar properties as those produced with commercial sources of nutrients.Entities:
Keywords: Komagataeibacter sucrofermentans; bacterial cellulose; biopolymer; waste streams
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26140376 PMCID: PMC4519874 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160714832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Bacterial cellulose production achieved when various commercial sugars and crude glycerol were used in shake flask fermentations.
Figure 2Glycerol (a) and FAN (b) consumption and BC (c) production using crude glycerol as carbon source and yeast extract with peptone as nitrogen sources at different initial FAN concentrations. The fermentation duration was 15 days. (▲), 360 mg/L FAN; (●), 500 mg/L FAN; (■), 700 mg/L FAN.
Figure 3Crude glycerol consumption and BC production using SFM hydrolysates and crude glycerol as fermentation media. (■), Glycerol; (□), BC.
Figure 4Total sugar consumption and BC production when FRW hydrolysates were used as fermentation media. (■), Total sugars; (□), BC.
BC production using various natural resources based on literature-cited publications.
| Strain | Fermentation Mode | Carbon Source | BC (g/L) | Productivity (g/L/d) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static batch fermentations | Konjac powder | 2.1 | 0.26 | [ | |
| Static batch fermentations | Fruit juices | 5.9 | 0.42 | [ | |
| Agitated batch cultures (135 rpm) | Maple syrup | 1.5 | 0.07 | [ | |
| Static batch fermentations | Thin stillage from rice wine distillery | 10.4 | 1.48 | [ | |
| Static batch fermentations | Wheat straw hydrolysates | 8.3 | 1.18 | [ | |
| Static batch fermentations | Spruce hydrolysates | 8.2 | 0.59 | [ | |
| Static batch fermentations | Glycerol from biodiesel production process | 10 | 0.71 | [ | |
| Grape bagasse from wine production | 8 | 0.57 | |||
| Static batch fermentations | Wastewater of candied jujube processing industry | 2.2 | 0.37 | [ | |
| Static batch fermentations | Acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation wastewater | 1.3 | 0.19 | [ | |
| Static cultures in 30 L fermentor | Saccharified food wastes | 18 | 3.6 | [ | |
| Agitated culture in 10 L jar fermentor | 16.8 | 3.36 | |||
| Static batch fermentations | Cotton cloth hydrolysates | 10.8 | 0.77–1.54 | [ | |
| Static batch fermentations | Waste beer yeast hydrolysates | 7 | 0.5 | [ | |
| 50 L spherical type bubble column bioreactor | Saccharified food wastes | 5.6 | 1.87 | [ | |
| Static batch fermentations | Pineapple waste and sugar cane juice | 4 | 0.3 | [ | |
| Agitated batch fermentations | 0.8 | 0.11 | |||
| Static batch fermentations | Grape skins aqueous extract | 0.6 | 0.15 | [ | |
| Industrial hardwood spent sulfite liquor | 0.3 | 0.07 |
Properties of bacterial cellulose samples.
| Properties | BC1 | BC2 | BC3 | BC4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stress at break [σ] (MPa) | 139.5 ± 12.6 | 79.8 ± 7.6 | 94.5 ± 8.2 | 72.3 ± 6 |
| Elongation at break [ε] (%) | 8.5 ± 0.2 | 7.1 ± 0.0 | 9.2 ± 0.4 | 7.05 ± 0.02 |
| Young’s modulus [Ε] (GPa) | 1.64 ± 0.2 | 1.13 ± 0.11 | 1.02 ± 0.09 | 0.97 ± 0.05 |
| Crystallinity index [CrI] (%) | 88 | 74 | 81 | 89 |
| Mean crystallite size [CrS] (nm) | 5.9 | 6.4 | 6.1 | 5.7 |
| Intrinsic viscosity [η] (dL/g) | 9.3 | 7.5 | 4.7 | 6.2 |
| Molecular weight [ | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.35 |
| Degree of polymerization [DP] | 2672.8 | 2391.2 | 1889.1 | 2176.1 |
| Water holding capacity [WHC] (g·water/g·dry BC) | 138 ± 9 | 124 ± 5 | 131 ± 4 | 102 ± 6 |
Figure 5SEM images of BC samples that were produced using different fermentation media. BC1, crude glycerol combined with glucose-free HS medium; BC2, crude glycerol combined with SFM hydrolysate medium; BC3, HS medium; and BC4, FRW hydrolysate medium (all micrographs correspond to 20k magnification).
Figure 6XRD diffraction patterns of bacterial cellulose samples.