Literature DB >> 20358409

Potential of biocellulose nanofibers production from agricultural renewable resources: preliminary study.

Yaser Dahman1, Kithsiri E Jayasuriya, Magdalina Kalis.   

Abstract

In the present preliminary study, we report results for the biocellulose nanofibres production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Production was examined by utilizing different feedstocks of single sugars and sugar mixtures with compositions similar to the acid hydrolyzates of different agriculture residues. Profiles for cell proliferation, sugar consumption, and the subsequent pH changes were thoroughly analyzed. Highest biocellulose production of 5.65 g/L was achieved in fructose medium with total sugar consumption of 95.57%. Moreover, the highest production using sugar mixtures was 5.2 g/L, which was achieved in feedstock with composition identical to the acid hydrolyzate of wheat straws. This represented the highest biocellulose yield of 17.72 g/g sugars compared with 14.77 g/g fructose. The lowest production of 1.1 and 1.75 g/L were obtained in xylose and glucose media, respectively, while sucrose and arabinose media achieved relatively higher production of 4.7 and 4.1 g/L, respectively. Deviation in pH of the fermentation broths from the optimum value of 4-5 generally had marked effect on biocellulose production with single sugars in feedstock. However, the final pH values recorded in the different sugar mixtures were approximately 3.3-3.4, which had lower effect on production hindrance. Analyzing profiles for sugars' concentrations and cell growth showed that large amount of the metabolized sugars were mainly utilized for bacterial cell growth and maintenance, rather than biocellulose production. This was clearly observed with single sugars of low production, while sugar consumption was rather utilized for biocellulose production with sugar mixtures. Results reported in this study demonstrate that agriculture residues might be used as potential feedstocks for the biocellulose nanofibres production. Not only this represents a renewable source of feedstock, but also might lead to major improvements in production if proper supplements and control were utilized in the fermentation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20358409     DOI: 10.1007/s12010-010-8946-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol        ISSN: 0273-2289            Impact factor:   2.926


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of methods for detoxification of spruce hydrolysate for bacterial cellulose production.

Authors:  Xiang Guo; Adnan Cavka; Leif J Jönsson; Feng Hong
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 5.328

2.  Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 in a low-cost medium using optimal combined design.

Authors:  Yasaman Raiszadeh-Jahromi; Mahmoud Rezazadeh-Bari; Hadi Almasi; Saber Amiri
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Stoichiometric Analysis and Production of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter liquefaciens using Borassus flabellifer L. Jaggery.

Authors:  Sangavi Senthilnathan; Sameeha Syed Abdul Rahman; Saroja Pasupathi; Ponnusami Venkatachalam; Sugumaran Karuppiah
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge.

Authors:  Adnan Cavka; Xiang Guo; Shui-Jia Tang; Sandra Winestrand; Leif J Jönsson; Feng Hong
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Bacterial Cellulose Production from Industrial Waste and by-Product Streams.

Authors:  Erminda Tsouko; Constantina Kourmentza; Dimitrios Ladakis; Nikolaos Kopsahelis; Ioanna Mandala; Seraphim Papanikolaou; Fotis Paloukis; Vitor Alves; Apostolis Koutinas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Comparison of productivity and quality of bacterial nanocellulose synthesized using culture media based on seven sugars from biomass.

Authors:  Genqiang Chen; Guochao Wu; Lin Chen; Wei Wang; Feng F Hong; Leif J Jönsson
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.813

7.  Cheese Whey Processing: Integrated Biorefinery Concepts and Emerging Food Applications.

Authors:  Iliada K Lappa; Aikaterini Papadaki; Vasiliki Kachrimanidou; Antonia Terpou; Dionysios Koulougliotis; Effimia Eriotou; Nikolaos Kopsahelis
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-08-15

8.  Antimicrobial Properties of Bacterial Cellulose Films Enriched with Bioactive Herbal Extracts Obtained by Microwave-Assisted Extraction.

Authors:  Ioana M Bodea; Giorgiana M Cătunescu; Carmen R Pop; Nicodim I Fiț; Adriana P David; Mircea C Dudescu; Andreea Stănilă; Ancuța M Rotar; Florin I Beteg
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  Optimized culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter senegalensis MA1.

Authors:  K Aswini; N O Gopal; Sivakumar Uthandi
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.563

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.