Literature DB >> 26140296

Quantifying the influence of measured and unmeasured individual differences on demography.

Floriane Plard1,2,3, Jean-Michel Gaillard1,2, Tim Coulson4, Daniel Delorme5, Claude Warnant5, Jacques Michallet5, Shripad Tuljapurkar3, Siddharth Krishnakumar3, Christophe Bonenfant1,2.   

Abstract

1. Demographic rates can vary not only with measured individual characters like age, sex and mass but also with unmeasured individual variables like behaviour, genes and health. 2. Predictions from population models that include measured individual characteristics often differ from models that exclude them. Similarly, unmeasured individual differences have the potential to impact predictions from population models. However, unmeasured individual differences are rarely included in population models. 3. We construct stage- and age-structured models (where stage is mass) of a roe deer population, which are parameterized from statistical functions that either include, or ignore, unmeasured individual differences. 4. We found that mass and age structures substantially impacted model parameters describing population dynamics, as did temporal environmental variation, while unmeasured individual differences impacted parameters describing population dynamics to a much smaller extent once individual heterogeneity related to mass and age has been included in the model. We discuss how our assumptions (unmeasured individual differences only in mean trait values) could have influenced our findings and under what circumstances unmeasured individual differences could have had a larger impact on population dynamics. 5. There are two reasons explaining the relative small influence of unmeasured individual differences on population dynamics in roe deer. First, individual body mass and age both capture a large amount of individual differences in roe deer. Second, in large populations of long-lived animals, the average quality of individuals (independent of age and mass) within the population is unlikely to show substantial variation over time, unless rapid evolution is occurring. So even though a population consisting of high-quality individuals would have much higher population growth rate than a population consisting of low-quality individuals, the probability of observing a population consisting only of high-quality individuals is small.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age structure; body mass; growth rate; individual random effect; integral projection model; roe deer; size structure

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26140296      PMCID: PMC5642278          DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  35 in total

1.  Evolution in the real world: stochastic variation and the determinants of fitness in Carlina vulgaris.

Authors:  Karen E Rose; Mark Rees; Peter J Grubb
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Individual heterogeneity in vital parameters and demographic stochasticity.

Authors:  Yngvild Vindenes; Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Individual covariation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Cam; William A Link; Evan G Cooch; Jean-Yves Monnat; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Consequences of recruitment decisions and heterogeneity on age-specific breeding success in a long-lived seabird.

Authors:  Lise M Aubry; David N Koons; Jean-Yves Monnat; Emmanuelle Cam
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  How does climate change influence demographic processes of widespread species? Lessons from the comparative analysis of contrasted populations of roe deer.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Gaillard; A J Mark Hewison; François Klein; Floriane Plard; Mathieu Douhard; Raziel Davison; Christophe Bonenfant
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  A general formula for the sensitivity of population growth rate to changes in life history parameters.

Authors:  H Caswell
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality.

Authors:  J W Vaupel; K G Manton; E Stallard
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1979-08

8.  Quantitative trait loci for maternal performance for offspring survival in mice.

Authors:  Andréa C Peripato; Reinaldo A De Brito; Ty T Vaughn; L Susan Pletscher; Sergio R Matioli; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Beyond R0: demographic models for variability of lifetime reproductive output.

Authors:  Hal Caswell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mismatch between birth date and vegetation phenology slows the demography of roe deer.

Authors:  Floriane Plard; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tim Coulson; A J Mark Hewison; Daniel Delorme; Claude Warnant; Christophe Bonenfant
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  Food availability affects adult survival trajectories depending on early developmental conditions.

Authors:  Michael Briga; Egbert Koetsier; Jelle J Boonekamp; Blanca Jimeno; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Des différences, pourquoi? Transmission, maintenance and effects of phenotypic variance.

Authors:  Floriane Plard; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tim Coulson; Shripad Tuljapurkar
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Fathers matter: male body mass affects life-history traits in a size-dimorphic seabird.

Authors:  Tina Cornioley; Stéphanie Jenouvrier; Luca Börger; Henri Weimerskirch; Arpat Ozgul
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Associations between self-esteem and smoking and excessive alcohol consumption in the UK: A cross-sectional study using the BBC UK Lab database.

Authors:  Dorothy Szinay; Ildiko Tombor; Claire Garnett; Neil Boyt; Robert West
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2019-10-19

5.  Interacting effects of unobserved heterogeneity and individual stochasticity in the life history of the southern fulmar.

Authors:  Stéphanie Jenouvrier; Lise M Aubry; Christophe Barbraud; Henri Weimerskirch; Hal Caswell
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.091

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.