Literature DB >> 26140166

Chromosomal and molecular evidence for presence of Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) poseidon (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) in Caucasus region.

Vladimir A Lukhtanov1, Valentin V Tikhonov2.   

Abstract

We show how combination of chromosomal and molecular markers can be applied for proper species identification in Agrodiaetus Hübner, 1822 blue butterflies. Using this approach we provide first evidence for presence of Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) poseidon (Herrich-Schäffer, [1851]) in Georgia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agrodiaetus; COI; Lycaenidae; Polyommatus; chromosome number; karyotype

Year:  2015        PMID: 26140166      PMCID: PMC4488971          DOI: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i2.5020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Cytogenet        ISSN: 1993-0771            Impact factor:   1.800


Introduction

The blue butterfly subgenus PageBreak Hübner, 1822 belongs to the genus Latreille, 1804 (Talavera et al. 2013). In the last years, this group become a model system for study of speciation and chromosome evolution (Lukhtanov et al. 2015, Vershinina et al. 2015). Despite this, its taxonomy is still poorly elaborated and identification of individual species is difficult due to their morphological similarity. Species within the subgenus are mostly uniform and exhibit few differences in characters traditionally used in classification, such as wing pattern and/or aspects of the male and female genitalia (Lukhtanov et al. 2006, Vila et al. 2010). The genus was estimated to have originated very recently (Kandul et al. 2004) and, thus, many species may have not had sufficient time to acquire extensive genetic differences. In particular, COI barcode gap is low or even absent between numerous closely related species of (Wiemers and Fiedler 2007). In opposite to majority of other butterflies and moths (Lukhtanov 2014), many species have evolved distinctive karyotypes. They show one of the highest interspecific karyotypic diversities known in the animal kingdom with haploid chromosome numbers ranging from n = 10 to n = 134 (Lukhtanov et al. 2005). Therefore, karyotypic features provide important identification characters for many described species that are virtually indistinguishable by their morphology. However, it should be noted that in few cases the chromosome number may be identical in different species (see Results and Discussion). Here we show how combination of chromosomal and molecular markers can be applied for proper species identification in . Using this approach we provide first evidence for presence of (Herrich-Schäffer, [1851]) in Georgia.

Material and methods

The samples used for molecular and chromosomal analysis were collected in Georgia (Akhaltsikhe, 41.60N, 43.06E, 1000 m alt., 18 July 2014, V. Lukhtanov et V. Tikhonov leg., samples 2014VL56, 2014VL57, 2014VL58, 2014VL62, 2014VL63, 2014VL64, 2014VL65, 2014VL68, 2014VL69, 2014VL70). The methods of DNA sequencing, chromosomal analysis and phylogenetic inference were described previously (Lukhtanov and Dantchenko 2002a, Lukhtanov et al. 2008, 2014, Vershinina and Lukhtanov 2010, Przybyłowicz et al. 2014). Additional samples of belonging to species complex (Kandul et al. 2007) were used for comparison.

Results and discussion

The species PageBreak (= Staudinger, 1892, synonymized with by Schurian et. 1992) is known to be an endemic of the Middle East sporadically distributed from Kütahya in West Turkey to Artvin in North-East Turkey (Hesselbarth et al. 1995). Phenotypically similar, but chromosomally distinct species (Lukhtanov & Dantchenko, 2002) was described from East Turkey (provinces Erzurum and Ağri) (Lukhtanov and Dantchenko 2002b). The last taxon is allopatric in distribution with and differs from by chromosome number and karyotype structure (Lukhtanov and Dantchenko 2002b). has relatively low haploid chromosome number (from n=19 on the south and east of the distributional range to n=21 in the north), all the chromosomes form a gradient size row with no especially large or small chromosomes (de Lesse 1963, Kandul and Lukhtanov 1997). Chromosome numbers n=22 and n=23 were also found in the northern population as intraindividual occasional deviations from the basic n=21 (de Lesse 1963). has higher chromosome numbers (from n=24 to n=27, with n=26 as a distinct mode). Its karyotype is asymmetrical and includes chromosomes of two distinct classes: class of large chromosomes and class of small chromosomes (Lukhtanov and Dantchenko 2002b). Currently is treated as a distinct species (Lukhtanov and Dantchenko 2002b, Wiemers 2003, Wiemers and Fiedler 2007) or a subspecies of (Tshikolovets 2011). The taxon (Larsen, 1974) discovered in Lebanon and Syria is often considered as a subspecies of (e.g. Tshikolovets 2011), however, it differs in chromosome number (n=17, Larsen 1975) and may represent a different species (Eckweiler and Häuser 1997). The taxon (Sheljuzhko, 1928) was also considered as subspecies of (Hesselbarth et al. 1995), however, with respect to mitochondrial genes COI and COII it is very distant from and was shown to be a subspecies of (Herrich-Schäffer, [1844]) (Lukhtanov et al. 2005, Kandul et al. 2007). Males of PageBreak have plesiomorphic (Kandul et al. 2004, Lukhtanov et al. 2005) blue colouration of the upper side of the wings with no specific morphological characters. Therefore their morphological discrimination from phenotypically similar (Staudinger, 1871), and (Staudinger, 1899) is difficult. With respect to COI barcodes, is indistinguishable from (Herrich-Schäffer, [1851]) and (Wiemers & Fiedler, 2007). As it was stated above, the chromosome number varies within (de Lesse 1963, Kandul and Lukhtanov 1997, Lukhtanov and Dantchenko 2002b) and thus overlap with chromosome numbers found in (Forster, 1956), (Staudinger, 1899), (de Lessse, 1963), (de Lesse, 1959), (Zerny, 1932), (Forster, 1956), (Staudinger, 1878), ten Hagen et Eckweiler, 2001 and (Lukhtanov & Dantchenko, 2002) (Kandul et al. 2007, Lukhtanov et al. 2014). A population of blue butterflies which were morphologically similar to PageBreak (Fig. 1) was discovered near Akhaltsikhe in Georgia in 2013 by V.Tikhonov and I. Kostyuk. In 2014 the locality was visited again in order to collect material available for molecular and chromosomal study. Molecular analysis of this material revealed that COI barcodes were completely identical or nearly identical (barcode gap from 0 to 0.6%) in population from Akhaltsikhe and other populations of and (Fig. 2).
Figure 1.

from Akhaltsikhe, Georgia. a male, upperside b male, underside.

Figure 2.

Bayesian tree of the species close to inferred from COI sequences. Posterior probability values >50% are shown.

from Akhaltsikhe, Georgia. a male, upperside b male, underside. Bayesian tree of the species close to inferred from COI sequences. Posterior probability values >50% are shown. The haploid chromosome number n=19 was found in MI and MII cells of three studied individuals (2014VL57, 2014VL58, 2014VL62) (Fig. 3). All chromosome elements formed a gradient size row. The karyotype contained no exceptionally large or small chromosomes. In this respect, the population from Akhaltstikhe is indistinguishable from populations of from Amasya (de Lesse 1963) and Artvin (Kandul and Lukhtanov 1997), but differs from (n=26) (Lukhtanov and Dantchenko 2002b).
Figure 3.

Male karyotype of from Georgia. a sample 2014VL57, metaphase I, n = 19 b sample 2014VL62, metaphase II, n = 19. Bar = 10 μm.

Male karyotype of from Georgia. a sample 2014VL57, metaphase I, n = 19 b sample 2014VL62, metaphase II, n = 19. Bar = 10 μm. Thus, although in the studied case neither the DNA barcodes nor chromosomal numbers are species-specific characters, their combination clearly indicates that the population from Akhaltsikhe should be identified as . This is the first evidence of for Georgia and for Caucasus region at whole.
  9 in total

1.  Principles of the highly ordered arrangement of metaphase I bivalents in spermatocytes of Agrodiaetus (Insecta, Lepidoptera).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Phylogeny of Agrodiaetus Hübner 1822 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences of COI and COII and nuclear sequences of EF1-alpha: karyotype diversification and species radiation.

Authors:  Nikolai P Kandul; Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Alexander V Dantchenko; James W S Coleman; Cagan H Sekercioglu; David Haig; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Reinforcement of pre-zygotic isolation and karyotype evolution in Agrodiaetus butterflies.

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Nikolai P Kandul; Joshua B Plotkin; Alexander V Dantchenko; David Haig; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Karyotypic diversity and speciation in Agrodiaetus butterflies.

Authors:  Nikolai P Kandul; Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Homoploid hybrid speciation and genome evolution via chromosome sorting.

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Nazar A Shapoval; Boris A Anokhin; Alsu F Saifitdinova; Valentina G Kuznetsova
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Ribosomal DNA clusters and telomeric (TTAGG)n repeats in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) with low and high chromosome numbers.

Authors:  Alisa O Vershinina; Boris A Anokhin; Vladimir A Lukhtanov
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 1.800

7.  Taxonomic position of several enigmatic Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) species (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) from Central and Eastern Iran: insights from molecular and chromosomal data.

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Nazar A Shapoval; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.800

8.  Chromosome number evolution in skippers (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 1.800

9.  Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? - a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae).

Authors:  Martin Wiemers; Konrad Fiedler
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.172

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Intragenomic variations of multicopy ITS2 marker in Agrodiaetus blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae).

Authors:  Nazar A Shapoval; Vladimir A Lukhtanov
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 1.800

2.  Karyosystematics and molecular taxonomy of the anomalous blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) from the Balkan Peninsula.

Authors:  Maria S Vishnevskaya; Alsu F Saifitdinova; Vladimir A Lukhtanov
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 1.800

3.  Evolutionary mechanisms of runaway chromosome number change in Agrodiaetus butterflies.

Authors:  Alisa O Vershinina; Vladimir A Lukhtanov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A new butterfly species from south Russia revealed through chromosomal and molecular analysis of the Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) damonides complex (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 1.800

5.  Taxonomic interpretation of chromosomal and mitochondrial DNA variability in the species complex close to Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) dama (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae).

Authors:  Nazar A Shapoval; Vladimir A Lukhtanov
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.546

6.  Karyotype reinvestigation does not confirm the presence of two cryptic species and interspecific hybridization in the Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) damocles complex in the Crimea (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Konstantin A Efetov; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 1.800

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.