Literature DB >> 26139047

Stability and safety of MA50 intraocular lens placed in the sulcus.

P S Kemp1, T A Oetting1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the safety and stability of sulcus placement of the MA50 intraocular lens (IOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with MA50 IOLs placed in the sulcus at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA, from 1997 to 2012 were identified. Inclusion criteria included patients with over 4 weeks of follow-up data. AEL was compared with incidence of IOL decentration using at two-tailed Student's t-test.
RESULTS: Fifty eyes of 49 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Four weeks post-operatively, the average best-corrected visual acuity was 20/30. IOL decentration occurred in 14% of patients; patients with decentered IOLs had a significantly longer average AEL (25.37 mm) than patients whose IOL remained centered (23.94 mm, P=0.017). Other complications included uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome (12%), iritis (8%), and glaucoma (6%). There were no cases of pigment dispersion syndrome or need for lens exchange. Twelve eyes (24%) had intra-operative optic capture by the anterior capsule, none of which had post-operative decentration.
CONCLUSION: The MA50 IOL is a reasonable, stable option for placement in the sulcus, with a low-risk profile; however, in eyes with longer AEL and presumably larger anterior segment, surgeons should consider placing an IOL with longer haptic distance than the MA50 to maintain centration. Optic capture of the MA50 IOL by the anterior capsule should be considered for longer eyes, as it is protective against decentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26139047      PMCID: PMC4815664          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  12 in total

Review 1.  Explantation of intraocular lenses.

Authors:  N Mamalis
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Pigmentary dispersion syndrome with a secondary piggyback 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic lens. Case report with clinicopathological correlation.

Authors:  Wellington H Chang; Liliana Werner; Luther L Fry; Jonathan T Johnson; Kandon Kamae; Nick Mamalis
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Consultation section: cataract surgical problem.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Clinical results with a supplementary toric intraocular lens for the correction of astigmatism in pseudophakic patients.

Authors:  Tiago B Ferreira; João Pinheiro
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Pigment dispersion with elevated intraocular pressure after AcrySof intraocular lens implantation in the ciliary sulcus.

Authors:  R Wintle; M Austin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Elevated intraocular pressure in secondary piggyback intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Takeshi Iwase; Nobushige Tanaka
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Use of AcrySof acrylic foldable intraocular lens for secondary implantation in children.

Authors:  Tracy Crnic; David R Weakley; David Stager; Joost Felius
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Secondary intraocular lens implantation for pediatric aphakia.

Authors:  Rupal H Trivedi; M Edward Wilson; John Facciani
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  Secondary pigmentary glaucoma associated with piggyback intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Shirley H L Chang; Gerald Lim
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Complications of sulcus placement of single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses: recommendations for backup IOL implantation following posterior capsule rupture.

Authors:  David F Chang; Samuel Masket; Kevin M Miller; Rosa Braga-Mele; Brian C Little; Nick Mamalis; Thomas A Oetting; Mark Packer
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  6 in total

1.  Response to Dr Sandhu and Dr Clarke.

Authors:  P S Kemp; T A Oetting
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Stability and safety of MA50 intraocular lens placed in the sulcus.

Authors:  A Sandhu; J Clarke
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Posterior optic buttonholing of intraocular lens implantation through posterior capsulorrhexis margin: A technique of intraocular lens implantation in cases of anterior capsulorrhexis extension in pediatric cataract surgery.

Authors:  Amit Mohan; Pradhnya Sen; Richa Jain; Chintan Shah; Elesh Jain; Alok Sen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia.

Authors:  Tadas Naujokaitis; Ling Zhao; Debora Scharf; Ramin Khoramnia; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-10

5.  Comparison of the Techniques of Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation after Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Katarzyna Krysik; Dariusz Dobrowolski; Ewa Wroblewska-Czajka; Anita Lyssek-Boron; Edward Wylegala
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Surgical Synechiolysis of Iridocapsular Adhesion and Sulcus Placement of a Rigid Intraocular Lens on an Oversized Residual Capsular Rim.

Authors:  Jiao Lyu; Qi Zhang; Haiying Jin; Tingyi Liang; Jili Chen; Peiquan Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.